Ultrafiltration (UF) Pilot Plant for Municipal Wastewater Reuse in Agriculture: Impact of the Operation Mode on Process Performance

Abstract: Following increasing interest in the use of UltraFiltration (UF) membrane processes as an alternative advanced disinfection technique, the performance of a UF pilot plant was investigated under two opposite operating conditions (“stressed operating condition” versus “conventional operating condition”). The results indicate that for both conditions, the reclaimed effluent complied with the Italian regulations for unrestricted wastewater reuse ( i.e. , Total Suspended Solids (TSS) < 10 mg/L; Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) < 100 mg/L and Escherichia coli < 10 CFU/100 mL). On the other hand, when compared with the Title 22 of the California Wastewater Reclamation Criteria, only the effluent produced under the “conventional operating condition” met the stipulated water quality standards ( i.e. , TSS and turbidity undetectable and total coliforms < 2.2 CFU/100 mL). It should be noted that, in spite of the nominal cut-off size, total coliforms breakthrough was indeed occasionally observed. A localized membrane pore micro-enlargement mechanism was hypothesized to explain the total coliforms propagation in the ultrafiltered effluent, as monitoring of the membrane permeability and transmembrane pressure highlighted that gel/cake formation had only a minor contribution to the overall membrane fouling mechanism with respect to pore plugging and pore narrowing mechanisms.

[1]  Bruce O. Mansell,et al.  Free Chlorine Disinfection of Membrane Bioreactor Permeate: Disinfection Efficacies, Disinfection Byproducts, And Selected Microcontaminants , 2009 .

[2]  M. Notarnicola,et al.  Effect of Suspended Particles on Disinfection of a Physicochemical Municipal Wastewater with Peracetic Acid , 2008 .

[3]  Shichang Wang,et al.  Study of integrated membrane systems for the treatment of wastewater from cooling towers , 2006 .

[4]  Bethany A Madge,et al.  Ultraviolet Disinfection of Fecal Coliform in Municipal Wastewater: Effects of Particle Size , 2006, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[5]  J. Lozier,et al.  Implementing a Multi-Barrier Approach using Ultrafiltration and UV Disinfection , 2005 .

[6]  D. Bagley,et al.  Evaluation of a Membrane Process for Water Reuse , 2005 .

[7]  M. Gómeza,et al.  Urban wastewater disinfection by filtration technologies , 2005 .

[8]  Bruce O. Mansell,et al.  COMPARISON OF TWO MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS AND AN ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT WITH DUAL-MEDIA FILTRATION: NUTRIENT AND PRIORITY POLLUTENTS REMOVALS , 2004 .

[9]  G Tchobanoglous,et al.  Ultrafiltration of wastewater: effects of particles, mode of operation, and backwash effectiveness. , 2001, Water research.

[10]  Hongde Zhou,et al.  Advanced technologies in water and wastewater treatment , 2001 .

[11]  Kimberly A. Woodhouse,et al.  Model for flux prediction in high-shear microfiltration systems , 2000 .

[12]  M R Wiesner,et al.  Peer reviewed: the promise of membrane technology. , 1999, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  The promise of membrane technology , 1999 .

[14]  Awwa,et al.  Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater , 1999 .

[15]  Munir Cheryan,et al.  Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook , 1998 .

[16]  Pierre Côté,et al.  Immersed membranes activated sludge process applied to the treatment of municipal wastewater , 1998 .

[17]  Greg Turner,et al.  Nanofiltration: from prototype to full scale , 1997 .

[18]  C. Cabassud,et al.  How slug flow can improve ultrafiltration flux in organic hollow fibres , 1997 .

[19]  J. Laîné,et al.  Mechanism of Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and MS2 virus removal by MF and UF , 1995 .

[20]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .