Effect of Oral Administration with Lactobacillus plantarum CAM6 on the Hematological Profile, Relative Weight of Digestive Organs, and Cecal Traits in Growing Pigs

Simple Summary Despite scientific evidence and a ban by the European Union, antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) are still commonly used in intensive pig production systems in many countries to decrease gastrointestinal problems and improve feed efficiency and growth. Concerns over the adverse effects of antibiotics on human health have led to a search for natural alternatives. Previous studies evaluated the effects of Lactobacillus plantarum (L. plantarum) CAM6, isolated from the Colombian Creole pig Zungo and registered in Genbank, on weaned piglets and sows during gestation–lactation. However, the effect of this probiotic strain on growing pigs is unknown. The results showed that oral administration of L. plantarum CAM 6 modified the weight of the digestive organs, the histomorphometry of the concentric layers, and the depth and width of the cecal crypts; decreased cecal lesions; and stimulated the growth of lactic acid bacteria (specifically autochthonous strains) without affecting the blood count compared to the control. These findings suggest that Lactobacillus plantarum CAM6 could be considered as an effective alternative to subtherapeutic antibiotics in growing pigs. Abstract This study aimed to investigate the effects of oral administration with L. plantarum CAM6 on the hematological profile, relative weight of digestive organs, and cecal traits in growing pigs. A total of 36 castrated male pigs [(Landrace × Pietrain) × Duroc] aged 49 to 139 days old were randomly assigned to 3 experimental groups with 12 animals per treatment. The treatments included a control diet without additives (CTRL), a positive control with subtherapeutic antibiotics (TRT1), and CTRL supplemented with 5 mL Lactobacillus plantarum CAM6 preparation providing 109 CFU/pig/day (TRT2). The TRT2 group showed a higher (p ≤ 0.05) small intestine length and the cecum relative weight compared to the CTRL group. Moreover, L. plantarum CAM6 supplementation promoted (p ≤ 0.05) increased thickness of the muscular and mucosal layers, as well as enhanced depth and width of the cecal crypts. The TRT2 group also showed well-defined crypts without lesions, while the CTRL and TRT1 groups exhibited congestion, lymphocytic infiltration in the crypt, and intestinal-associated lymphoid tissue atrophy, respectively. Additionally, TRT2 stimulated (p ≤ 0.05) the growth of the autochthonous cecal microbiota compared to other experimental groups. Overall, the results indicate that oral administration of L. plantarum CAM6 improved intestinal health and enhanced the growth of autochthonous cecal lactic acid bacteria and had no impact on the complete blood count in growing pigs.

[1]  C. Dozois,et al.  The Diversity of Escherichia coli Pathotypes and Vaccination Strategies against This Versatile Bacterial Pathogen , 2023, Microorganisms.

[2]  Pinghua Li,et al.  Increased Proportion of Fiber-Degrading Microbes and Enhanced Cecum Development Jointly Promote Host To Digest Appropriate High-Fiber Diets , 2022, mSystems.

[3]  E. Hill-Yardin,et al.  Issues for patchy tissues: defining roles for gut-associated lymphoid tissue in neurodevelopment and disease , 2022, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[4]  D. Kang,et al.  Gut microbiome-produced metabolites in pigs: a review on their biological functions and the influence of probiotics , 2022, Journal of animal science and technology.

[5]  Isabella C. F. S. Condotta,et al.  Impact of housing environment and management on pre-/post-weaning piglet productivity , 2022, Journal of animal science.

[6]  Juncai Hou,et al.  Lactobacillus plantarum 23-1 improves intestinal inflammation and barrier function through the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway in obese mice. , 2022, Food & function.

[7]  A. Czech,et al.  Dietary fermented rapeseed or/and soybean meal additives on performance and intestinal health of piglets , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Dongyou Yu,et al.  Probiotic Paenibacillus polymyxa 10 and Lactobacillus plantarum 16 enhance growth performance of broilers by improving the intestinal health , 2021, Animal nutrition.

[9]  G. Téllez-Isaías,et al.  Effect of Oral Administration with Lactobacillus plantarum CAM6 Strain on Sows during Gestation-Lactation and the Derived Impact on Their Progeny Performance , 2021, Mediators of inflammation.

[10]  B. Velázquez‐Martí,et al.  In Vitro Characterization of Indigenous Probiotic Strains Isolated from Colombian Creole Pigs , 2020, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[11]  G. Téllez-Isaías,et al.  Evaluation of Oral Administration of Lactobacillus plantarum CAM6 Strain as an Alternative to Antibiotics in Weaned Pigs , 2020, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[12]  S. Ramsay Machine , 2020, Further Reading.

[13]  Sung Yong Chang,et al.  Beneficial roles of probiotics on the modulation of gut microbiota and immune response in pigs , 2019, PloS one.

[14]  C. Ra,et al.  Lactobacillus-based fermentation product and lactose level in the feed for weanling pigs: Effects on intestinal morphology, microbiota, gas emission, and targeted intestinal coliforms , 2019, Livestock Science.

[15]  F. Gandolfi,et al.  Evolution of pig intestinal stem cells from birth to weaning. , 2019, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[16]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Future global pig production systems according to the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  S. Martín-Orúe,et al.  Practical aspects of the use of probiotics in pig production: A review , 2019, Livestock Science.

[18]  De‐chang Chen,et al.  Facing a new challenge: the adverse effects of antibiotics on gut microbiota and host immunity , 2019, Chinese medical journal.

[19]  Kunling Teng,et al.  Lactobacillus plantarum PFM 105 Promotes Intestinal Development Through Modulation of Gut Microbiota in Weaning Piglets , 2019, Front. Microbiol..

[20]  É. Yergeau,et al.  Salmonella shedding status of the sow affects the microbiota of their piglets at weaning , 2018, Journal of applied microbiology.

[21]  H. D. den Bakker,et al.  Molecular detection and quantification of viable probiotic strains in animal feedstuffs using the commercial direct fed microbial Lactobacillus animalis NP51 as a model. , 2018, Journal of microbiological methods.

[22]  Aike Li,et al.  Effects of microencapsulated Lactobacillus plantarum and fructooligosaccharide on growth performance, blood immune parameters, and intestinal morphology in weaned piglets , 2018 .

[23]  G. Rossi,et al.  Effect of a dietary probiotic blend on performance, blood characteristics, meat quality and faecal microbial shedding in growing-finishing pigs , 2017 .

[24]  A. Okoh,et al.  Effects of probiotics on growth performance, blood parameters, and antibody stimulation in piglets , 2017 .

[25]  Jiajia Zhu,et al.  Effects of soybean meal fermented by L. plantarum, B. subtilis and S. cerevisieae on growth, immune function and intestinal morphology in weaned piglets , 2017, Microbial Cell Factories.

[26]  Liping Zhao,et al.  The Maturing Development of Gut Microbiota in Commercial Piglets during the Weaning Transition , 2017, Front. Microbiol..

[27]  P. Gerber,et al.  Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate , 2017 .

[28]  M. Nyachoti,et al.  Using probiotics to improve swine gut health and nutrient utilization☆ , 2017, Animal nutrition.

[29]  K. Williams,et al.  Early weaning stress induces chronic functional diarrhea, intestinal barrier defects, and increased mast cell activity in a porcine model of early life adversity , 2017, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[30]  G. Spano,et al.  Lactobacillus plantarum and Its Probiotic and Food Potentialities , 2017, Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins.

[31]  T. O’Sullivan,et al.  Hematology and biochemistry reference intervals for Ontario commercial nursing pigs close to the time of weaning. , 2017, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[32]  D. Torrallardona,et al.  Spray dried plasma as an alternative to antibiotics in piglet feeds, mode of action and biosafety , 2016, Porcine health management.

[33]  S. Qiao,et al.  Effects of dietary Lactobacillus plantarum B1 on growth performance, intestinal microbiota, and short chain fatty acid profiles in broiler chickens. , 2016, Poultry science.

[34]  J. O’Doherty,et al.  The Effect of Divergence in Feed Efficiency on the Intestinal Microbiota and the Intestinal Immune Response in Both Unchallenged and Lipopolysaccharide Challenged Ileal and Colonic Explants , 2016, PloS one.

[35]  O. Levy,et al.  Oral antibiotics increase blood neutrophil maturation and reduce bacteremia and necrotizing enterocolitis in the immediate postnatal period of preterm pigs , 2016, Innate immunity.

[36]  J. Björkroth,et al.  Effect of a multispecies lactobacillus formulation as a feeding supplement on the performance and immune function of piglets , 2015 .

[37]  Xiangfang Zeng,et al.  Study and use of the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri in pigs: a review , 2015, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology.

[38]  C. Pál,et al.  Perturbation of Iron Homeostasis Promotes the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance , 2014, Molecular biology and evolution.

[39]  C. Field,et al.  The immune modifying effects of amino acids on gut-associated lymphoid tissue , 2013, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology.

[40]  I. Kim,et al.  Effect of probiotics supplementation in diets with different nutrient densities on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, faecal microbial population and faecal noxious gas content in growing pigs , 2013 .

[41]  Xin Wang,et al.  Effects of lactobacillus plantarum ZJ316 on pig growth and pork quality , 2012, BMC Veterinary Research.

[42]  E. Matur,et al.  The Impact of Probiotics on the Gastrointestinal Physiology , 2012 .

[43]  B. Yu,et al.  Effects of dietary supplementation of Chinese medicinal herbs on polymorphonuclear neutrophil immune activity and small intestinal morphology in weanling pigs. , 2012, Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition.

[44]  Tran Quoc Viet,et al.  Growth performance, digestibility, gut environment and health status in weaned piglets fed a diet supplemented with a complex of lactic acid bacteria alone or in combination with Bacillus subtilis and Saccharomyces boulardii , 2012 .

[45]  B. B. Jensen,et al.  The incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis is increased following probiotic administration to preterm pigs. , 2011, The Journal of nutrition.

[46]  K. Ushida,et al.  Oral administration of Lactobacillus plantarum Lq80 and Megasphaera elsdenii iNP-001 induces efficient recovery from mucosal atrophy in the small and the large intestines of weaning piglets. , 2009, Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho.

[47]  K. Ushida,et al.  Oral administration of Lactobacillus plantarum strain Lq80 to weaning piglets stimulates the growth of indigenous lactobacilli to modify the lactobacillal population. , 2007, The Journal of general and applied microbiology.

[48]  T. Niewold The nonantibiotic anti-inflammatory effect of antimicrobial growth promoters, the real mode of action? A hypothesis. , 2007, Poultry science.

[49]  P. Barrow,et al.  Rapid Protection of Gnotobiotic Pigs against Experimental Salmonellosis following Induction of Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes by Avirulent Salmonella enterica , 2003, Infection and Immunity.

[50]  Council , 1954, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[51]  W. Bryden,et al.  Platforms to accelerate biomanufacturing of enzyme and probiotic animal feed supplements: discovery considerations and manufacturing implications , 2022, Animal Production Science.

[52]  K. Ushida,et al.  Influence of weaning age on the villous height and disaccharidase activities in the porcine small intestine. , 2016, Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho.

[53]  Javier A. Moreno-Verdín IBM (International Business Machine) , 2014 .