AFEL: Towards Measuring Online Activities Contributions to Self-directed Learning

More and more learning activities take place online in a selfdirected manner. Therefore, just as the idea of self-tracking activities for fitness purposes has gained momentum in the past few years, tools and methods for awareness and self-reflection on one’s own online learning behavior appear as an emerging need for both formal and informal learners. Addressing this need is one of the key objectives of the AFEL (Analytics for Everyday Learning) project. In this paper, we discuss the different aspects of what needs to be put in place in order to enable awareness and self-reflection in online learning. We start by describing a scenario that guides the work done. We then investigate the theoretical, technical and support aspects that are required to enable this scenario, as well as the current state of the research in each aspect within the AFEL project. We conclude with a discussion of the ongoing plans from the project to develop learner-facing tools that enable awareness and selfreflection for online, self-directed learners. We also elucidate the need to establish further research programs on facets of self-tracking for learning that are necessarily going to emerge in the near future, especially regarding privacy and ethics.

[1]  Simone Kopeinik,et al.  Supporting collaborative learning with tag recommendations: a real-world study in an inquiry-based classroom project , 2017, LAK.

[2]  Mathieu d'Aquin,et al.  On Requirements for Federated Data Integration as a Compilation Process , 2015, USEWOD-PROFILES@ESWC.

[3]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Models of Innovative Knowledge Communities and Three Metaphors of Learning , 2004 .

[4]  Daniela Giordano,et al.  Interlinking educational resources and the web of data: A survey of challenges and approaches , 2013, Program.

[5]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[6]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  Learning and Collective Knowledge Construction With Social Media: A Process-Oriented Perspective , 2015, Educational psychologist.

[7]  Dominik Kowald,et al.  Attention Please! A Hybrid Resource Recommender Mimicking Attention-Interpretation Dynamics , 2015, WWW.

[8]  Victoria J. Marsick,et al.  Lessons from Informal and Incidental Learning , 1997 .

[9]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  What Is Knowledge? Who Creates It? Who Possesses It? The Need for Novel Answers to Old Questions , 2016 .

[10]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Social Learning Analytics , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[11]  Martin A. Simon.  Reconstructing Mathematics Pedagogy from a Constructivist Perspective. , 1995 .

[12]  Maarten de Laat,et al.  Social Learning Analytics: Navigating the Changing Settings of Higher Education. , 2014 .

[13]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[14]  Denis Helic,et al.  Semantic Stability in Wikipedia , 2016, COMPLEX NETWORKS.

[15]  D. McNamara,et al.  Assessing Text Readability Using Cognitively Based Indices , 2008 .

[16]  Mark J. W. Lee,et al.  Personalised and Self Regulated Learning in the Web 2.0 Era: International Exemplars of Innovative Pedagogy Using Social Software. , 2010 .

[17]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges , 2012 .

[18]  Denis Helic,et al.  The influence of social status and network structure on consensus building in collaboration networks , 2016, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[19]  H. E. Stubbé,et al.  Self-directed adult learning in a ubiquitous learning environment : A meta-review , 2008 .

[20]  A. Sfard.  On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One , 1998 .

[21]  Gina Neff,et al.  Self-Tracking , 2016 .

[22]  Mihai Surdeanu,et al.  The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit , 2014, ACL.

[23]  Christoph Trattner,et al.  VizRec , 2016 .

[24]  Steffen P. Walz,et al.  Foucault's Fitbit: Governance and Gamification , 2014 .