Building Decision Support Systems based on Fuzzy Inference

Uncertainty and ambiguity are inherent properties of our understanding of the world and our ability to communicate this understanding to others, in both a quantitative and qualitative way. This fact makes uncertainty and ambiguity inherent in decision making processes and thus decision support tools need to provide capabilities for their effective handling. This paper presents an overview of a number of decision support systems, integrating quantitative and qualitative criteria, primarily by means of fuzzy inference as a tool for handling linguistic ambiguity and uncertainty. The decision support systems discussed cover a wide range of spatial scales, from local to regional, a number of different contexts, from urban to rural and address a variety of objectives, from urban sustainability to regional environmental protection. They have all been developed in the Urban Water Research Group of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Imperial College London, over a period of 10 years. Despite their differences, the models discussed possess common underlying methodological concepts and have been developed to some extent with similar “building blocks”. Issues of complementarities and added value which result from both the conceptual and methodological approaches adopted are explored and an indication of possible future directions is presented. It is concluded that a flexible, component-based, rapid-prototyping method for developing decision support systems capable of explicit handling of ambiguity and uncertainty through fuzzy inference are fundamental to the development of tools, which can be adopted in practice and can truly support inclusive decision making.

[1]  Christos Makropoulos,et al.  PLANNING SITE‐SPECIFIC WATER‐DEMAND MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES , 2004 .

[2]  David Butler,et al.  Spatial decisions under uncertainty: fuzzy inference in urban water management , 2004 .

[3]  Christos Makropoulos,et al.  Fuzzy Logic Spatial Decision Support System for Urban Water Management , 2003 .

[4]  Douglas C. Engelbart,et al.  Augmenting human intellect: a conceptual framework , 1962 .

[5]  R. Ashley,et al.  Sustainable Water Services: a Procedural Guide , 2004 .

[6]  T. Ross Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications , 1994 .

[7]  David Butler,et al.  Spatial ordered weighted averaging: incorporating spatially variable attitude towards risk in spatial multi-criteria decision-making , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[8]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 1999 .

[9]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[10]  Michael B. Abbott,et al.  The gender issue in hydroinformatics, or Orpheus in the Underworld , 2000 .

[11]  Roland K. Price Hydroinformatics and urban drainage: an agenda for the beginning of the 21st century , 2000 .

[12]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[13]  W. TanW.,et al.  Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic Systems , 2007 .

[14]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision-making , 1988 .

[15]  Christos Makropoulos,et al.  A multi-objective evolutionary programming approach to the ‘object location’ spatial analysis and optimisation problem within the urban water management domain , 2005 .