Global and Local Optimization of Flapping Kinematics

In this work, optimization methodologies of the kinematics of flapping wings in forward and hover flights are considered. Particularly, local and global optimization algorithms are combined with the unsteady vortex lattice method (UVLM) to determine the most efficient kinematics. In the first problem, the kinematic optimization of a three-dimensional flapping wing in forward flight with active shape morphing is aimed at maximizing the propulsive efficiency under lift and thrust constraints. Results show that due to the quasi-concavity of the objective function associated with the flapping kinematics employed in forward flight, local gradient-based optimizers perform very well in terms of accuracy and computational cost. In the second problem, the objective is to identify the optimized kinematics of a twodimensional hovering wing that minimize the aerodynamic power under lift constraint. The results show that using a hybrid optimization algorithm (combination of local and global schemes) accelerates the convergence to optimal points and avoids being trapped at local minimum points. While the efficiency of using a local optimizer, a global optimizer, or a hybrid of the two depends on the nature of the problem and associated design space, it is determined that hybrid optimization is best suited for determining local minima.

[1]  J. Katz,et al.  Low-Speed Aerodynamics , 1991 .

[2]  Masha Sosonkina,et al.  Performance Modeling and Analysis of a Massively Parallel Direct—Part 2 , 2009, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[3]  S. N. Fry,et al.  The aerodynamics of hovering flight in Drosophila , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[4]  Thomas Hemker,et al.  DIRECT using local search on surrogates , 2011 .

[5]  Bret Stanford,et al.  Analytical Sensitivity Analysis of an Unsteady Vortex Lattice Method for Flapping Wing Optimization , 2009 .

[6]  Wright-Patterson Afb,et al.  Variable-Fidelity Kinematic Optimization of a Two- Dimensional Hovering Wing , 2011 .

[7]  A. R. Ennos The kinematics and aerodynamics of the free flight of some diptera , 1989 .

[8]  Balakumar Balachandran,et al.  A comparison of computational models for fluid-structure interaction studies of flexible flapping wing systems , 2011 .

[9]  Sophia Lefantzi,et al.  DAKOTA : a multilevel parallel object-oriented framework for design optimization, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis. , 2011 .

[10]  K. Svanberg The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization , 1987 .

[11]  Saïd Salhi,et al.  A hybrid algorithm for identifying global and local minima when optimizing functions with many minima , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Mehdi Ghommem,et al.  Modeling and Analysis for Optimization of Unsteady Aeroelastic Systems , 2011 .

[13]  Jan Mayer,et al.  A numerical evaluation of preprocessing and ILU-type preconditioners for the solution of unsymmetric sparse linear systems using iterative methods , 2009, TOMS.

[14]  Weixing Yuan,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Simulations of Flapping Wings , 2010 .

[15]  Hao Liu,et al.  Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity , 2010 .

[16]  Gordon J. Berman,et al.  Energy-minimizing kinematics in hovering insect flight , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Mehdi Ghommem,et al.  Deterministic Global Optimization of Flapping Wing Motion for Micro Air Vehicles , 2010 .

[18]  Hao Liu,et al.  Integrated modeling of insect flight: From morphology, kinematics to aerodynamics , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[19]  Masha Sosonkina,et al.  Remark on Algorithm 897 , 2015 .

[20]  Krister Svanberg,et al.  A Class of Globally Convergent Optimization Methods Based on Conservative Convex Separable Approximations , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[21]  Wei Shyy,et al.  Flapping and flexible wings for biological and micro air vehicles , 1999 .