The contents of this second special issue on applications of optimization heuristics to estimation and modelling problems reflect the broadening scope of successful applications of optimization heuristics in statistical analysis. The journal Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (CSDA) has acquired a positive reputation in publishing articles relying on results of optimization heuristics. This issue as the first one in 2004 (Winker and Gilli, 2004) aims to encourage further submissions in this field of research. It provides relevant examples for which optimization heuristics are found to work efficiently. The fast increasing number of implementations, the introduction of new heuristics and the generation of a large number of hybrid methods results in a nontrivial selection problem. Given that most papers rely on a single method or compare just a small number of algorithms for a few problem instances, it is not obvious as to which method to choose for a specific application and problem instance. The classification of optimization heuristics provided in Winker and Gilli (2004) can help to identify crucial features of an algorithm. Nevertheless, its real performance on any given problem instance will remain subject to a careful implementation analysis. A recent overview on the methods and their potential can be found in Winker and Maringer (2007). Typically, optimization heuristics are stochastic algorithms. Consequently, the results obtained for a specific problem instance might change with each repetition. Often, this stochastic feature is considered as being an unwelcome property, although statisticians are used to analyze stochastic events. In fact, the outcome of the implementation of an optimization heuristic can be analyzed using standard statistical methods as well as specific methods from Markov chain analysis. An examples for a statistical framework is presented by Fitzenberger and Winker (2007) in this special issue, while approaches based on Markov chain analysis can by found, e.g., in Jacobson and Yücesan (2004) and Jacobson et al. (2006). Confidence in the methods will increase by an improved presentation of the implementations and a rigorous analysis of the results obtained. There is no commonly agreed standard for presenting results obtained from the application of optimization heuristics. For this special issue the following nonexhaustive guidelines have been considered: • A complete description of the implementation of the heuristic including all parameter settings. • The description of any preliminary testing of parameter settings (number of different settings analyzed, impact of parameter settings on outcome), if possible using a structured approach. • A clear indication of how many runs of the algorithms have been used for each of the results presented. Furthermore, information on the distribution of the results (in terms of values of the objective function and/or other variables of interest) should be provided. • Information whether and to which extent an increase in computational time (number of iterations etc.) improves the results should be provided. Preferably, some graph or estimate of the rate of improvement should be presented. • The comparison with other methods will require either the evaluation of multiple problem instances or a Monte Carlo simulation. In both cases, a detailed information on the set up should be provided.
[1]
Sheldon Howard Jacobson,et al.
Visiting near-optimal solutions using local search algorithms
,
2006
.
[2]
George Kapetanios,et al.
Variable selection in regression models using nonstandard optimisation of information criteria
,
2007,
Comput. Stat. Data Anal..
[3]
Enver Yücesan,et al.
Global Optimization Performance Measures for Generalized Hill Climbing Algorithms
,
2004,
J. Glob. Optim..
[4]
Peter Winker,et al.
The Threshold Accepting Optimisation Algorithm in Economics and Statistics
,
2007
.
[5]
M. M. Ali.
Synthesis of the beta-distribution as an aid to stochastic global optimization
,
2007,
Comput. Stat. Data Anal..
[6]
Elia Biganzoli,et al.
Selection of artificial neural network models for survival analysis with Genetic Algorithms
,
2007,
Comput. Stat. Data Anal..
[7]
Ricardo H. C. Takahashi,et al.
A genetic algorithm for irregularly shaped spatial scan statistics
,
2007,
Comput. Stat. Data Anal..
[8]
Sandra Paterlini,et al.
Using differential evolution to improve the accuracy of bank rating systems
,
2007,
Comput. Stat. Data Anal..
[9]
Peter Winker,et al.
Applications of optimization heuristics to estimation and modelling problems
,
2004,
Comput. Stat. Data Anal..
[10]
Peter Winker,et al.
Improving the computation of censored quantile regressions
,
2007,
Comput. Stat. Data Anal..
[11]
Peter Winker,et al.
Identification of multivariate AR-models by threshold accepting
,
1995
.
[12]
Timur Keskintürk,et al.
A genetic algorithm approach to determine stratum boundaries and sample sizes of each stratum in stratified sampling
,
2007,
Comput. Stat. Data Anal..
[13]
Marc Hofmann,et al.
Efficient algorithms for computing the best subset regression models for large-scale problems
,
2007,
Comput. Stat. Data Anal..
[14]
Zheng Yang,et al.
GSA-based maximum likelihood estimation for threshold vector error correction model
,
2007,
Comput. Stat. Data Anal..
[15]
Anna Staszewska,et al.
Representing uncertainty about response paths: The use of heuristic optimisation methods
,
2007,
Comput. Stat. Data Anal..