This essay argues that it is difficult to justify intellectually a separate subject of international operations management. Nevertheless, courses with titles like that abound and other professional activities are centered on international operations, at least in the United States. Of course, there are real differences in management activities in different parts of the world that must be contended with. A comparison of European and U.S. managers' exposure to international business suggests that there is a higher startup cost for U.S. managers to do so. Drawing an analogy between the management of operations and the solving of a huge mathematical programming problem implies that there are few new variables introduced by going international, but that the weights on existing variables can change substantially. Therefore, even though difficult to justify intellectually, continuing to treat international operations management separately may provide us some short-term advantages. By helping us focus our attention on the important variables that change, it may provide us the insights to help reduce the startup cost for U.S. managers entering international operations.
[1]
D. C. Whybark,et al.
Comparing manufacturing output and practices in China, Hungary, the USSR and USA
,
1996
.
[2]
D. Clay Whybark,et al.
GMRG survey research in operations management
,
1997
.
[3]
Tonya Boone,et al.
An analysis of research on international operations networks
,
1996
.
[4]
R. Klassen,et al.
Barriers to the management of international operations
,
1994
.
[5]
Meir J. Rosenblatt,et al.
INTRODUCING INTERNATIONAL ISSUES INTO OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT CURRICULA
,
2009
.
[6]
D. Clay Whybark,et al.
Marketing's influence on manufacturing practices
,
1994
.