Improving accuracy for finite element modeling of endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysm

Background Computer modeling of endovascular coiling intervention for intracranial aneurysm could enable a priori patient-specific treatment evaluation. To that end, we previously developed a finite element method (FEM) coiling technique, which incorporated simplified assumptions. To improve accuracy in capturing real-life coiling, we aimed to enhance the modeling strategies and experimentally test whether improvements lead to more accurate coiling simulations. Methods We previously modeled coils using a pre-shape based on mathematical curves and mechanical properties based on those of platinum wires. In the improved version, to better represent the physical properties of coils, we model coil pre-shapes based on how they are manufactured, and their mechanical properties based on their spring-like geometric structures. To enhance the deployment mechanics, we include coil advancement to the aneurysm in FEM simulations. To test if these new strategies produce more accurate coil deployments, we fabricated silicone phantoms of 2 patient-specific aneurysms in duplicate, deployed coils in each, and quantified coil distributions from intra-aneurysmal cross-sections using coil density (CD) and lacunarity (L). These deployments were simulated 9 times each using the original and improved techniques, and CD and L were calculated for cross-sections matching those in the experiments. To compare the 2 simulation techniques, Euclidean distances (dMin, dMax, and dAvg) between experimental and simulation points in standardized CD-L space were evaluated. Univariate tests were performed to determine if these distances were significantly different between the 2 simulations. Results Coil deployments using the improved technique agreed better with experiments than the original technique. All dMin, dMax, and dAvg values were smaller for the improved technique, and the average values across all simulations for the improved technique were significantly smaller than those from the original technique (dMin: p = 0.014, dMax: p = 0.013, dAvg: p = 0.045). Conclusion Incorporating coil-specific physical properties and mechanics improves accuracy of FEM simulations of endovascular intracranial aneurysm coiling.

[1]  Jianping Xiang,et al.  Finite element modeling of endovascular coiling and flow diversion enables hemodynamic prediction of complex treatment strategies for intracranial aneurysm. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Shigeo Wada,et al.  Computational model of coil placement in cerebral aneurysm with using realistic coil properties , 2015 .

[3]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  Efficient simulation of blood flow past complex endovascular devices using an adaptive embedding technique , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Adnan H Siddiqui,et al.  Methodology for Computational Fluid Dynamic Validation for Medical Use: Application to Intracranial Aneurysm. , 2017, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  Makoto Yamamoto,et al.  Hemodynamics and coil distribution with changing coil stiffness and length in intracranial aneurysms , 2017, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[6]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Lacunarity indices as measures of landscape texture , 1993, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  Jaimie M. Henderson,et al.  Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention , 2006 .

[8]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Virtual Coiling of Intracranial Aneurysms Based on Dynamic Path Planning , 2011, MICCAI.

[9]  David A. Steinman,et al.  An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[10]  Yang Wang,et al.  Numerical simulation of patient-specific endovascular stenting and coiling for intracranial aneurysm surgical planning , 2018, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[11]  Jérémie Dequidt,et al.  Interactive Simulation of Embolization Coils: Modeling and Experimental Validation , 2008, MICCAI.

[12]  J. Jensen On the shear coefficient in Timoshenko's beam theory , 1983 .

[13]  A. Bogdanov,et al.  Aneurysm permeability following coil embolization : packing density and coil distribution , 2016 .

[14]  D. Kallmes,et al.  Coils in a Nutshell: A Review of Coil Physical Properties , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[15]  C. Cognard,et al.  [Reconstruction technic in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms. Long-term angiographic and clinical results. Apropos of 56 cases]. , 1997, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[16]  Hui Meng,et al.  Validation of CFD simulations of cerebral aneurysms with implication of geometric variations. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  Ari D. Kappel,et al.  In vitro measurement of the permeability of endovascular coils deployed in cerebral aneurysms , 2018, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[18]  H. P. Lee,et al.  Comparison of implicit and explicit finite element methods for dynamic problems , 2000 .

[19]  A. Aliseda,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics of cerebral aneurysm coiling using high-resolution and high-energy synchrotron X-ray microtomography: comparison with the homogeneous porous medium approach , 2016, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[20]  Y. Ventikos,et al.  Haemodynamic simulation of aneurysm coiling in an anatomically accurate computational fluid dynamics model: technical note , 2008, Neuroradiology.

[21]  David H Frakes,et al.  Finite element modeling of embolic coil deployment: multifactor characterization of treatment effects on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  H. Woo,et al.  In Vitro Quantification of the Size Distribution of Intrasaccular Voids Left After Endovascular Coiling of Cerebral Aneurysms , 2013, Cardiovascular engineering and technology.

[23]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Analysis and quantification of endovascular coil distribution inside saccular aneurysms using histological images , 2012, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[24]  P. Sandercock,et al.  International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion , 2005, The Lancet.

[25]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  A Virtual Coiling Technique for Image-Based Aneurysm Models by Dynamic Path Planning , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  Novel geometric approach for virtual coiling , 2018, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[27]  P. Purdy,et al.  Endovascular coils: properties, technical complications and salvage techniques , 2012, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[28]  Makoto Ohta,et al.  Poly-vinyl alcohol hydrogel vascular models for in vitro aneurysm simulations: the key to low friction surfaces. , 2004, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[29]  C. Slump,et al.  Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils. , 2004, Radiology.

[30]  Shandra Bipat,et al.  Coiling of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review on Initial Occlusion and Reopening and Retreatment Rates , 2009, Stroke.