Catenary-Free Tramway Systems: Functional and Cost–Benefit Analysis for a Metropolitan Area

New tramway technologies such as “ground-level power supply systems” fit with the purpose of preserving historical heritage and urban environments of city centers. Such public transportation systems do not require a traditional air supply system (+ 750 V) and are therefore referred to as “catenary-free systems” (i.e., APS system, tramwave system, Primove system). Their implementation is becoming increasingly widespread, especially for cities with prestigious historical heritage, where high levels of environmental sustainability, capacity, reliability and safety standards are required. The study compares some of the most well-known and novel catenary-free systems for the creation of a 68-km tramway system, to be implemented in a metropolitan city. For each of the 7 new tramways, AIMSUN microsimulations were run to identify the most appropriate tramway track geometry and road section to minimize the interference with the vehicle activity. Moreover, for each system a financial and economic performance analysis has been carried out for an investment of about 869 million euros, while taking into account different scenarios of transportation demand. In addition, a cost–benefit analysis of the tramway lines investment project has been presented, including the calculation of the financial net present value, the economic net present value, rate of return of the investment and cost–benefit ratio. The analysis demonstrates that the APS ground-level power supply system is a proven alternative with greater economic and financial performance.

[1]  Chia-Lin Chen Tram development and urban transport integration in Chinese cities: A case study of Suzhou , 2018, Economics of Transportation.

[2]  R. Prud’homme,et al.  Substituting a tramway to a bus line in Paris: Costs and benefits , 2011 .

[3]  Xing Zhao,et al.  Modeling a modern tram system integrated with a road traffic simulation , 2018, Simul..

[4]  Ferdinando Corriere,et al.  A NEW METHODOLOGY TO ESTIMATE DEFORMATION OF LONGITUDINAL SAFETY BARRIERS , 2013 .

[5]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Modelling Transport: Ortúzar/Modelling Transport , 2011 .

[6]  Gabriele D'Orso,et al.  A GIS-Based Methodology to Estimate the Potential Demand of an Integrated Transport System , 2017, ICCSA.

[7]  M. Turró,et al.  Measuring the value for money of transport infrastructure procurement; an intergenerational approach , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[8]  A. Valero,et al.  Environmental Impacts of Promoting New Public Transport Systems in Urban Mobility: A Case Study , 2017 .

[9]  E. Prassas,et al.  Engineering Economics and Finance for Transportation Infrastructure , 2013 .

[10]  Rodrigo Fernandez,et al.  Modelling public transport stops by microscopic simulation , 2008 .

[11]  John Black,et al.  LRT and street tram policies and implementation in turkish cities , 2016 .

[12]  Guido Gentile,et al.  Section 7.5 - Dynamic traffic assignment with non separable link cost functions and queue spillovers , 2009 .

[13]  Frank Becker,et al.  Catenary free operation of light rail vehicles — Topology and operational concept , 2016, 2016 18th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE'16 ECCE Europe).

[14]  Lily Elefteriadou An Introduction to Traffic Flow Theory , 2013 .

[15]  Vukan R Vuchic,et al.  Urban transit systems and technology , 2007 .

[16]  Konstantinos Tzanakakis,et al.  The Railway Track and Its Long Term Behaviour: A Handbook for a Railway Track of High Quality , 2013 .

[17]  Diègo Legros,et al.  From bus to tramway: Is there an economic impact of substituting a rapid mass transit system? An empirical investigation accounting for anticipation effect , 2018 .

[18]  Dimitris Sermpis,et al.  Tram priority at signal-controlled junctions , 2012 .

[19]  Marco Guerrieri,et al.  Tramways in Urban Areas: An Overview on Safety at Road Intersections , 2018, Urban Rail Transit.