Capturing contextual morality: applying game theory on smartphones

In order to build more fair Artificial Intelligence applications, a thorough understanding of human morality is required. Given the variable nature of human moral values, AI algorithms will have to adjust their behaviour based on the moral values of its users in order to align with end user expectations. Quantifying human moral values is, however, a challenging task which cannot easily be completed using e.g. surveys. In order to address this problem, we propose the use of game theory in longitudinal mobile sensing deployments. Game theory has long been used in disciplines such as Economics to quantify human preferences by asking participants to choose between a set of hypothetical options and outcomes. The behaviour observed in these games, combined with the use of mobile sensors, enables researchers to obtain unique insights into the effect of context on participant convictions.

[1]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Modelling smartphone usage: a markov state transition model , 2016, UbiComp.

[2]  Kai Kunze,et al.  Continuous Alertness Assessments: Using EOG Glasses to Unobtrusively Monitor Fatigue Levels In-The-Wild , 2019, CHI.

[3]  Jelle de Boer,et al.  Social Preferences and Context Sensitivity , 2017, Games.

[4]  Hannes Rusch,et al.  Experimental ethics : towards an empirical moral philosophy , 2014 .

[5]  James Zou,et al.  AI can be sexist and racist — it’s time to make it fair , 2018, Nature.

[6]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Effect of experience sampling schedules on response rate and recall accuracy of objective self-reports , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Lu Wang,et al.  Being Bad in a Video Game Can Make Us Morally Sensitive , 2014, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[8]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The Experience Sampling Method , 2014 .

[9]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Context-Informed Scheduling and Analysis: Improving Accuracy of Mobile Self-Reports , 2019, CHI.

[10]  J. Henrich,et al.  The Moral Machine experiment , 2018, Nature.

[11]  Ryan Calo,et al.  There is a blind spot in AI research , 2016, Nature.

[12]  R. Kessler,et al.  Measuring daily events and experiences: decisions for the researcher. , 1991, Journal of personality.

[13]  M. Dufwenberg Game theory. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[14]  D. Johnson,et al.  Changing Race Boundary Perception by Reading Narrative Fiction , 2014 .

[15]  Jessica E. Black,et al.  Development, reliability, and validity of the Moral Identity Questionnaire , 2016 .

[16]  Denzil Ferreira,et al.  AWARE: Mobile Context Instrumentation Framework , 2015, Front. ICT.

[17]  S. Hannah,et al.  Different Hats, Different Obligations: Plural Occupational Identities and Situated Moral Judgments , 2012 .

[18]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Gamification of Mobile Experience Sampling Improves Data Quality and Quantity , 2017, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[19]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Monetary Assessment of Battery Life on Smartphones , 2016, CHI.

[20]  Niels van Berkel,et al.  The Experience Sampling Method on Mobile Devices , 2017, ACM Comput. Surv..

[21]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Fueling AI with public displays?: a feasibility study of collecting biometrically tagged consensual data on a university campus , 2019, PerDis.

[22]  G. Miller,et al.  Science Perspectives on Psychological the Smartphone Psychology Manifesto on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science the Smartphone Psychology Manifesto Previous Research Using Mobile Electronic Devices What Smartphones Can Do Now and Will Be Able to Do in the near Future , 2022 .

[23]  R. McAfee,et al.  Auctions and Bidding , 1986 .