Relative responses of new malting barley cultivars to increasing nitrogen rates in western Canada

O'Donovan, J. T., Anbessa, Y., Grant, C. A., Macleod, A. L., Edney, M. J., Izydorczyk, M. S., Turkington, T. K., Juskiw, P. E., Lafond, G. P., May, W. E., Harker, K. N., Johnson, E. N., Beres, B. L., McAllister, T. A., Smith, E. G. and Chapman, W. 2015. Relative responses of new malting barley cultivars to increasing nitrogen rates in western Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 95: 831-839. Only about 25% of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is selected for malting annually in western Canada due to quality issues. While nitrogen (N) fertilization can increase yield, it can also impair quality by increasing protein to unacceptable levels. The objective of this study was to determine the responses of relatively new malting barley cultivars (Bentley, Major, CDC Meredith, and Merit 57) to increasing N rates compared to the response of AC Metcalfe, the most commonly grown malting cultivar. Experiments were conducted at seven locations in western Canada in 2010, 2011 and 2012. Nitrogen was banded at seeding at 0, 30, 60, 90, or 120 kg ha-1. All the new varieties produced higher yield (5 to 11%) than AC Metcalfe. Barley kernel yield and protein concentration increased with N rate. However, Merit 57, CDC Meredith and Bentley produced significantly lower protein concentration in response to N than AC Metcalfe and Major. The newer cultivars displayed higher N utilization efficiency than AC Metcalfe, possibly due to partitioning proportionally more N into leaf chlorophyll development. The higher leaf chlorophyll content may have enabled increased photosynthesis and a more efficient utilization of N for grain formation. Bentley produced the least tillers and had the highest kernel plumpness, while Merit 57 had the lowest kernel plumpness. CDC Meredith lodged most followed by Merit 57, while Major and Bentley lodged least, especially at the higher N rates. Merit 57 and CDC Meredith took longer to mature than the other cultivars but yielded well at relatively short growing season locations.

[1]  P. Carr,et al.  Malt Barley Cultivar Ranking under Long-Term Tillage Systems in a Semiarid Region , 2014 .

[2]  T. Turkington,et al.  Major barley , 2013, Canadian Journal of Plant Science.

[3]  R. B. Irvine,et al.  Effect of crop residue, nitrogen rate and fungicide application on malting barley productivity, quality, and foliar disease severity , 2012, Canadian Journal of Plant Science.

[4]  Smithe,et al.  Effect of seeding date and seeding rate on malting barley production in western Canada , 2012 .

[5]  T. Turkington,et al.  Seeding Rate, Nitrogen Rate, and Cultivar Effects on Malting Barley Production , 2011 .

[6]  Rong-Cai Yang,et al.  Towards understanding and use of mixed-model analysis of agricultural experiments , 2010 .

[7]  P. Juskiw,et al.  Registration of 'Bentley' Barley , 2009 .

[8]  Megumi Yoshida,et al.  Effect of lodging on the level of mycotoxins in wheat, barley, and rice infected with the Fusarium graminearum species complex , 2008, Journal of General Plant Pathology.

[9]  D. Moody,et al.  Improvements in malting barley grain yield by manipulation of genes influencing grain protein content , 2007, Euphytica.

[10]  E. Bremer,et al.  Fertilization, seeding date, and seeding rate for malting barley yield and quality in southern Alberta , 2005 .

[11]  Yueshu Li,et al.  New Canadian malting-barley varieties and their malting and brewing characteristics , 2004 .

[12]  D. Harder,et al.  AC Metcalfe barley , 2003 .

[13]  M. Froment BARLEY QUALITY AND GRAIN SIZE HOMOGENEITY FOR MALTING: VOLUME I: AGRONOMIC EFFECTS ON VARIETIES VOLUME II: ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL , 2003 .

[14]  J. Peltonen,et al.  Using a Chlorophyll Meter to Optimize Nitrogen Fertilizer Application for Intensively-Managed Small-Grain Cereals , 1995 .

[15]  C. Grant,et al.  Effect of fertilizer management, genotype, and environmental factors on some malting quality characteristics in barley , 1994 .

[16]  P. Schwarz,et al.  Nitrogen and Planting Date Effects on Low‐Protein Spring Barley , 1993 .

[17]  C. Grant,et al.  Yield response of semidwarf and conventional height barley cultivars to nitrogen fertilizer under varying moisture conditions , 1991 .

[18]  J. Helm,et al.  Lodging Effects on a Semidwarf and Two Standard Barley Cultivars , 1991 .

[19]  J. Lauer,et al.  Planting date and nitrogen rate effects on spring malting barley. , 1990 .

[20]  J.,et al.  A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals , 2022 .