geographical synchrony in microtine population cycles: a theoretical evaluation of the role of nomadic avian predators

A simple mathematical model is developed and analyzed to evaluate the hypothesis that regional synchrony in microtine population cycles is caused by nomadic avian predators. We show that predation by nomadic predators, capable of rapidly tracking the local prey densities, may indeed have a synchronizing effect. However, in contrast to the original hypothesis, our model requires no additional mechanism than predation (e.g. behavioural response of prey to predation) to produce synchronous prey cycles. In addition to the synchronizing effect, heavy predation pressure by nomadic predators is expected to shorten the period and dampen the amplitude of the prey cycles. Non-migrating predators having impact on their prey year round have a stronger synchronizing effect than migrating predators absent during the winter. We predict that geographic regions with few non-migrating predators are less likely to have synchronized microtine populations than regions with many such predators and that highly synchronized microtine populations have cycles with smaller amplitudes and shorter periods than microtine populations in geographic regions where local populations are not synchronized.

[1]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[2]  E. Korpimäki,et al.  Field Evidence for Nomadism in Tengmalm's Owl Aegolius funereus , 1987 .

[3]  C. S. Holling Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.

[4]  E. Korpimäki Rapid Tracking of Microtine Populations by Their Avian Predators: Possible Evidence for Stabilizing Predation , 1985 .

[5]  E. Korpimäki,et al.  Survival and natal dispersal of fledglings of Tengmalm's owl in relation to fluctuating food conditions and hatching date , 1988 .

[6]  J. Wiens Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[7]  I. Hanski Populations of small mammals cycle—Unless they don't , 1987 .

[8]  G. Sonerud Nest hole shift in Tengmalm's owl Aegolius funereus as defence against nest predation involving long-term memory in the predator , 1985 .

[9]  Fred L. Bunnell,et al.  An Arctic ecosystem: The Coastal Tundra at Barrow, Alaska , 1980 .

[10]  R. Ims On the Adaptive Value of Reproductive Synchrony as a Predator-Swamping Strategy , 1990, American Naturalist.

[11]  Erkki Korpimäki,et al.  Predation of Tengmalm's Owls: Numerical Responses, Functional Responses and Dampening Impact on Population Fluctuations of Microtines , 1989 .

[12]  C. Krebs,et al.  Population Cycles in Small Mammals , 1974 .

[13]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Reproductive Effort and Optimal Reproductive Rates in Small Rodents , 1980 .

[14]  A. McGuire,et al.  Comparison of amplitudes and frequencies (spectral analyses) of density variations in long-term data sets of Clethrionomys species , 1985 .

[15]  Robert M. May,et al.  Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics , 1976, Nature.

[16]  H. Henttonen,et al.  Rodent dynamics as community processes. , 1988, Trends in ecology & evolution.