Privatization in the health care system of Croatia: effects on general practice accessibility.

This paper analyzes some effects of the privatization process in primary health care in Croatia, and in particular evaluates actions taken by providers to improve their accessibility for patients. The sample was stratified by regional density of practices and the status of practices in relation to privatization. Three groups of general practices were included in the study and were assessed twice (in 1997/1998 and 1999/2000): (1) 106 privatized before the beginning of the study; (2) 96 privatized during the study period and (3) 65 that were not yet privatized. The research was performed by structured interview with general practitioners as informants. The indicators analyzed were: possibilities of obtaining first and follow-up visit appointments, honouring scheduled appointments, scheduling visits by telephone, visiting the practitioner after hours and obtaining telephone advice after working hours. Number of registered patients in the practice and perception of patients' waiting times were also assessed. Privatized practices performed better in improving the accessibility of their services for patients: they increasingly offered the possibility for first and follow-up appointments at precise times, scheduled visits by telephone and provided telephone advice outside working hours. They showed greater intention to honour made appointments in order to lower their patients' waiting times. The study indicates that, in the initial stage of privatization, practitioners tend to extend accessibility by structural improvements that are not time consuming. It seems that providers adjust the level of offered accessibility benefits according to the intensity of market competitiveness. Further research is needed to precisely delineate the range of structural adjustments that could be expected by privatization and to verify the effect of observed changes on the quality of care and health outcomes.

[1]  P. Toon NHS Direct audited. Telephone consultations in general practice should be tested. , 2002, British medical journal.

[2]  Steve George,et al.  NHS Direct audited , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  C. Ham The Third Way in Health Care Reform: Does the Emperor have Any Clothes? , 1999, Journal of health services research & policy.

[4]  B Ljubić,et al.  Reform of health insurance in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. , 1999, Croatian medical journal.

[5]  I. Svab,et al.  Slovenian experience on health care reform. , 1999, Croatian medical journal.

[6]  S. Turek Reform of health insurance in Croatia. , 1999, Croatian medical journal.

[7]  Julian Le Grand,et al.  Competition, cooperation, or control? Tales from the British National Health Service , 1999 .

[8]  Ž. Glavić,et al.  [Initial results of privatization of primary health services in the area of Pozega]. , 1999, Liječnički vjesnik.

[9]  D. Flynn Telephone triage as a strategy to ensure 24-hour access to medical care after the closure of supporting medical activity. , 1998, Military medicine.

[10]  I. Kostović,et al.  War victims in need of physical rehabilitation in Croatia , 1997, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[11]  T. Rathwell,et al.  Health care reforms in Bulgaria: an initial appraisal. , 1996, Social science & medicine.

[12]  A. Earl‐Slater Health-care reforms in the Czech Republic. , 1996, Journal of management in medicine.

[13]  Sullivan La Health system reform. , 1994, Iowa medicine : journal of the Iowa Medical Society.

[14]  T. Massaro,et al.  Health system reform in the Czech Republic. Policy lessons from the initial experience of the general health insurance company. , 1994, JAMA.

[15]  M. Roemer Recent health system development in Poland and Hungary , 1994, Journal of community health.

[16]  R. Battistella Health services reforms: political and managerial aims--an international perspective. , 1993, The International journal of health planning and management.

[17]  T. Ensor Health system reform in former socialist countries of Europe. , 1993, The International journal of health planning and management.

[18]  A. Hebrang [The direction of Croatian health care in the post-war period]. , 1991, Liječnički vjesnik.

[19]  A. Chandavarkar The Public and Private Sectors , 1959, Economic development and cultural change.

[20]  J. Mignon [Reform of health insurance]. , 1959, Concours medical.

[21]  M. Costello,et al.  Privatization, social structures and delivery of health care in the Slovak Republic. , 1998, Journal of Health Administration Education.

[22]  Lawlor Ef The demand for policy analysis in health reform: the view from the Romanian partnership. , 1998 .

[23]  J. Quick,et al.  Partnerships for health in the 21st century. , 1998, World health statistics quarterly. Rapport trimestriel de statistiques sanitaires mondiales.

[24]  R. Goldman Developing private health care in Macedonia. , 1996, Health marketing quarterly.

[25]  I. Sheĭman The development of market approaches in Russia. , 1994, The International journal of health planning and management.

[26]  E. Borgonovi,et al.  Management challenges and markets. , 1994, The International journal of health planning and management.

[27]  W. Newbrander,et al.  The public and private sectors in health: economic issues. , 1992, The International journal of health planning and management.

[28]  P. Lépés Changes in the Hungarian health system. , 1990, World hospitals.