Automated clarity assessment of retinal images using regionally based structural and statistical measures.

An automated image analysis system for application in mass medical screening must assess the clarity of the images before analysing their content. This is the case in grading for diabetic retinopathy screening where the failure to assess clarity could result in retinal images of people with retinopathy being erroneously classed as normal. This paper compares methods of clarity assessment based on the degradation of visible structures and based on the deviation of image properties outside expected norms caused by clarity loss. Vessel visibility measures and statistical measures were determined at locations in the image which have high saliency and these were used to obtain an image clarity assessment using supervised classification. The usefulness of the measures as indicators of image clarity was assessed. Tests were performed on 987 disc-centred and macula-centred retinal photographs (347 with inadequate clarity) obtained from the English National Screening Programme. Images with inadequate clarity were detected with 92.6% sensitivity at 90% specificity. In a set of 2000 macula-centred images (200 with inadequate clarity) from the Scottish Screening Programme, inadequate clarity was detected with 96.7% sensitivity at 90% specificity. This study has shown that structural and statistical measures are equally useful for retinal image clarity assessment.

[1]  Jean-Philippe Thiran,et al.  Automatic quality assessment in structural brain magnetic resonance imaging , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[3]  J. Conchello,et al.  Parametric blind deconvolution: a robust method for the simultaneous estimation of image and blur. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  P F Sharp,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of implementing automated grading within the national screening programme for diabetic retinopathy in Scotland , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[5]  J. Olson,et al.  Automated assessment of diabetic retinal image quality based on clarity and field definition. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  E. Simon Barriga,et al.  Vision-based, real-time retinal image quality assessment , 2009, 2009 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems.

[7]  Charles V. Stewart,et al.  Retinal Vessel Centerline Extraction Using Multiscale Matched Filters, Confidence and Edge Measures , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Ran Zeimer,et al.  An Image Based Auto-Focusing Algorithm forDigital Fundus Photography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Joachim Hornegger,et al.  Automated quality assessment of retinal fundus photos , 2010, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[10]  H. Jampel,et al.  A computer algorithm to quantitatively assess quality of digital optic disc images. , 2010, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye.

[11]  Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan,et al.  Edge image quality assessment: a new formulation for degraded edge imaging , 1998, Image Vis. Comput..

[12]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  Image structure clustering for image quality verification of color retina images in diabetic retinopathy screening , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  Stephen J. Aldington,et al.  The influence of age, duration of diabetes, cataract, and pupil size on image quality in digital photographic retinal screening , 2006 .

[14]  J G Fujimoto,et al.  A new quality assessment parameter for optical coherence tomography , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[15]  P. Scanlon,et al.  Article Commentary: The English national screening programme for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy , 2008, Journal of medical screening.

[16]  K. Khunti,et al.  Effectiveness of screening and monitoring tests for diabetic retinopathy – a systematic review , 2000, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[17]  Peter Wanger,et al.  Automated quality evaluation of digital fundus photographs , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica.

[18]  R V North,et al.  Acutance, an objective measure of retinal nerve fibre image clarity , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  Steven W. Zucker,et al.  Local Scale Control for Edge Detection and Blur Estimation , 1996, ECCV.

[20]  Roberto Marcondes Cesar Junior,et al.  Retinal vessel segmentation using the 2-D Gabor wavelet and supervised classification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  K. W. Tobin,et al.  Elliptical local vessel density: A fast and robust quality metric for retinal images , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[22]  Automated assessment of retinal image quality , 2004 .

[23]  J. Olson,et al.  The efficacy of automated “disease/no disease” grading for diabetic retinopathy in a systematic screening programme , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[24]  Yiming Wang,et al.  Automatic retinal image quality assessment and enhancement , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[25]  M Zeder,et al.  Automated quality assessment of autonomously acquired microscopic images of fluorescently stained bacteria , 2009, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[26]  J. Olson,et al.  Automated grading for diabetic retinopathy: a large-scale audit using arbitration by clinical experts , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.