The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in New York State. The role of surgeon volume.

OBJECTIVE To examine the longitudinal relationship between surgeon volume and in-hospital mortality for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in New York State and to explain changes in mortality that occurred over time. DESIGN Observation of clinically risk-adjusted operative mortality over time. SETTING All 30 New York State hospitals in which CABG surgery was performed for 1989 through 1992. PATIENTS All 57,187 patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery in New York State in 1989 through 1992 in the 30 hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Actual, expected, and risk-adjusted mortality. RESULTS Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality decreased for all categories of surgeons. Low-volume surgeons (< or = 50 operations per year) experienced a 60% reduction in risk-adjusted mortality in the 4-year period, whereas the highest-volume surgeons (> 150 operations per year) experienced a 34% reduction. The percentage of patients undergoing CABG surgery by low-volume surgeons decreased from 7.6% in 1989 to 5.7% in 1992, a 25% decrease. CONCLUSIONS The overall decline in risk-adjusted mortality could not be explained by shifts in patients away from low-volume surgeons to high-volume surgeons. The proportionately larger decrease in risk-adjusted mortality for low-volume surgeons could not be explained by changes in patient case mix or by improvements in the performance of surgeons with persistently low volumes. Part of the decrease was a result of the exodus of low-volume surgeons with high risk-adjusted mortality (in all years studied), the markedly better performance of surgeons who were new to the system (especially in 1991 and 1992), and the performance of surgeons who were not consistently low-volume surgeons (especially in 1992).

[1]  F. Hellinger,et al.  Heart disease and hospital deaths: an empirical study. , 1987, Health services research.

[2]  A. Vonhippel.  Coronary artery bypass surgery. , 1977 .

[3]  H S Luft,et al.  Selecting Categories of Patients for Regionalization: Implications of the Relationship Between Volume and Outcome , 1986, Medical care.

[4]  E L Hannan,et al.  Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. , 1994, JAMA.

[5]  H S Luft,et al.  Effects of Surgeon Volume and Hospital Volume on Quality of Care in Hospitals , 1987, Medical care.

[6]  H. Luft.  The Relation Between Surgical Volume and Mortality: An Exploration of Causal Factors and Alternative Models , 1980, Medical care.

[7]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[8]  F. Sloan,et al.  In-hospital mortality of surgical patients: is there an empiric basis for standard setting? , 1986, Surgery.

[9]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[10]  Edward L. Hannan,et al.  Investigation of the Relationship Between Volume and Mortality for Surgical Procedures Performed in New York State Hospitals , 1989 .

[11]  H. Luft,et al.  The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns? , 1987, Health services research.

[12]  Harold S. Luft,et al.  Association of volume with outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery —scheduled vs nonscheduled operations , 1987, JAMA.

[13]  E L Hannan,et al.  Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: The Relationship Between Inhospital Mortality Rate and Surgical Volume After Controlling For Clinical Risk Factors , 1991, Medical care.