Nature-based shoreline protection by tidal marsh plants depends on trade-offs between avoidance and attenuation of hydrodynamic forces

[1]  F. Rupprecht,et al.  Seasonal and spatial within-marsh differences of biophysical plant properties: implications for wave attenuation capacity of salt marshes , 2019, Aquatic Sciences.

[2]  S. Temmerman,et al.  High-resolution bed level changes in relation to tidal and wave forcing on a narrow fringing macrotidal flat: Bridging intra-tidal, daily and seasonal sediment dynamics , 2019, Marine Geology.

[3]  R. Feagin,et al.  The role of beach and sand dune vegetation in mediating wave run up erosion , 2019, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science.

[4]  Stijn Temmerman,et al.  How effective are tidal marshes as nature‐based shoreline protection throughout seasons? , 2019, Limnology and Oceanography.

[5]  B. Schröder,et al.  Contrasting elevational responses of regularly flooded marsh plants in navigable estuaries , 2019, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology.

[6]  W. Uijttewaal,et al.  Deriving vegetation drag coefficients in combined wave-current flows by calibration and direct measurement methods , 2018, Advances in Water Resources.

[7]  W. J. Neal,et al.  How to make Integrated Coastal Erosion Management a reality , 2018 .

[8]  S. Temmerman,et al.  Coping with waves: Plasticity in tidal marsh plants as self‐adapting coastal ecosystem engineers , 2018 .

[9]  S. Jonkman,et al.  Stem breakage of salt marsh vegetation under wave forcing : A field and model study , 2018 .

[10]  M.P.C. de Jong,et al.  A sustainability assessment of ports and port-city plans: Comparing ambitions with achievements , 2017 .

[11]  Allan T. Williams,et al.  Use of ecosystems in coastal erosion management , 2017 .

[12]  T. Spencer,et al.  Vegetation-wave interactions in salt marshes under storm surge conditions , 2017 .

[13]  T. Spencer,et al.  Plant stiffness and biomass as drivers for drag forces under extreme wave loading: A flume study on mimics , 2016 .

[14]  S. Jonkman,et al.  Nature-based flood protection: The efficiency of vegetated foreshores for reducing wave loads on coastal dikes , 2016 .

[15]  Kelly A. Burks-Copes,et al.  The Effectiveness, Costs and Coastal Protection Benefits of Natural and Nature-Based Defences , 2016, PloS one.

[16]  S. Temmerman,et al.  Effects of contrasting wave conditions on scour and drag on pioneer tidal marsh plants , 2016 .

[17]  B. Schröder,et al.  Vegetation as self‐adaptive coastal protection: Reduction of current velocity and morphologic plasticity of a brackish marsh pioneer , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[18]  P. Martone,et al.  Evidence of an evolutionary‐developmental trade‐off between drag avoidance and tolerance strategies in wave‐swept intertidal kelps (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) , 2016, Journal of phycology.

[19]  S. Temmerman,et al.  Resistance and reconfiguration of natural flexible submerged vegetation in hydrodynamic river modelling , 2016, Environmental Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  P. Henry,et al.  Drag forces on aquatic plants in nonlinear random waves plus current , 2015 .

[21]  Iris Möller,et al.  A review of plant‐flow interactions on salt marshes: the importance of vegetation structure and plant mechanical characteristics , 2015 .

[22]  S. Temmerman,et al.  Ecosystem Engineering by Plants on Wave-Exposed Intertidal Flats Is Governed by Relationships between Effect and Response Traits , 2015, PloS one.

[23]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Profiling risk and sustainability in coastal deltas of the world , 2015, Science.

[24]  Stijn Temmerman,et al.  Building land with a rising sea , 2015, Science.

[25]  T. Van Oyen,et al.  Observations of tidal and storm surge attenuation in a large tidal marsh , 2015 .

[26]  T. Spencer,et al.  Biophysical properties of salt marsh canopies — Quantifying plant stem flexibility and above ground biomass , 2015 .

[27]  P. Martone,et al.  Biomechanical consequences of branching in flexible wave-swept macroalgae. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[28]  S. Temmerman,et al.  Effects of Wind Waves versus Ship Waves on Tidal Marsh Plants: A Flume Study on Different Life Stages of Scirpus maritimus , 2015, PloS one.

[29]  M. Paul,et al.  Let it flow: how does an underlying current affect wave propagation over a natural seagrass meadow? , 2015 .

[30]  J. Schoelynck,et al.  Thigmomorphogenetic responses of an aquatic macrophyte to hydrodynamic stress , 2015, Front. Plant Sci..

[31]  Jonathan M. Gilligan,et al.  Flood risk of natural and embanked landscapes on the Ganges–Brahmaputra tidal delta plain , 2015 .

[32]  Matthias Kudella,et al.  Wave attenuation over coastal salt marshes under storm surge conditions , 2014 .

[33]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Identifying knowledge gaps hampering application of intertidal habitats in coastal protection: Oppor , 2014 .

[34]  V. Nikora,et al.  Biomechanical properties and morphological characteristics of lake and river plants: implications for adaptations to flow conditions , 2014, Aquatic Sciences.

[35]  S. Camargo,et al.  Coastal flooding by tropical cyclones and sea-level rise , 2013, Nature.

[36]  S. Temmerman,et al.  Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change , 2013, Nature.

[37]  S. Puijalon,et al.  Biomechanical responses of aquatic plants to aerial conditions. , 2013, Annals of botany.

[38]  Julian D. Orford,et al.  Rapid rise in Effective Sea-Level in southwest Bangladesh: Its causes and contemporary rates , 2013 .

[39]  Inigo J. Losada,et al.  The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation , 2013 .

[40]  Bregje K. van Wesenbeeck,et al.  Coastal adaptation with ecological engineering , 2013 .

[41]  R. Nicholls,et al.  Future flood losses in major coastal cities , 2013 .

[42]  S. Puijalon,et al.  Multi‐Scale Macrophyte Responses to Hydrodynamic Stress and Disturbances: Adaptive Strategies and Biodiversity Patterns , 2013 .

[43]  P. Reich,et al.  New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2013 .

[44]  D. Friess,et al.  Are all intertidal wetlands naturally created equal? Bottlenecks, thresholds and knowledge gaps to mangrove and saltmarsh ecosystems , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[45]  V. Nikora,et al.  Flow-plant interactions at a leaf scale: effects of leaf shape, serration, roughness and flexural rigidity , 2012, Aquatic Sciences.

[46]  Patrick Meire,et al.  Trade-off between drag reduction and light interception of macrophytes: comparing five aquatic plants with contrasting morphology , 2011 .

[47]  C. Crain,et al.  The Protective Role of Coastal Marshes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2011, PloS one.

[48]  P. Herman,et al.  Wave Attenuation by Two Contrasting Ecosystem Engineering Salt Marsh Macrophytes in the Intertidal Pioneer Zone , 2011, Wetlands.

[49]  Niels P R Anten,et al.  Plant resistance to mechanical stress: evidence of an avoidance-tolerance trade-off. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[50]  E. Barbier,et al.  The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: answering recent challenges to the paradigm , 2011 .

[51]  Aaron M Williams,et al.  Short communication: Engineering properties of wetland plants with application to wave attenuation , 2011 .

[52]  P. Herman,et al.  Comparing ecosystem engineering efficiency of two plant species with contrasting growth strategies. , 2010, Ecology.

[53]  David P. Callaghan,et al.  Hydrodynamic forcing on salt-marsh development: Distinguishing the relative importance of waves and tidal flows , 2010 .

[54]  Stijn Temmerman,et al.  Effects of shoot stiffness, shoot size and current velocity on scouring sediment from around seedlings and propagules , 2009 .

[55]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  Non‐linearity in ecosystem services: temporal and spatial variability in coastal protection , 2009 .

[56]  T. Bouma,et al.  Clonal plasticity of aquatic plant species submitted to mechanical stress: escape versus resistance strategy. , 2008, Annals of botany.

[57]  S. Hanson,et al.  Ranking Port Cities with High Exposure and Vulnerability to Climate Extremes: Exposure Estimates , 2008 .

[58]  S. Temmerman,et al.  Plant growth strategies directly affect biogeomorphology of estuaries , 2008 .

[59]  Alexia Stokes,et al.  Plant biomechanics in an ecological context. , 2006, American journal of botany.

[60]  Iris Möller,et al.  Quantifying saltmarsh vegetation and its effect on wave height dissipation: Results from a UK East coast saltmarsh , 2006 .

[61]  L. Leonard,et al.  The effect of standing biomass on flow velocity and turbulence in Spartina alterniflora canopies , 2006 .

[62]  N. Anten,et al.  Effects of Mechanical Stress and Plant Density on Mechanical Characteristics, Growth, and Lifetime Reproduction of Tobacco Plants , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[63]  P. Herman,et al.  Trade-offs related to ecosystem engineering: A case study on stiffness of emerging macrophytes , 2005 .

[64]  Pierre Sagnes,et al.  Adaptations to increasing hydraulic stress: morphology, hydrodynamics and fitness of two higher aquatic plant species. , 2005, Journal of experimental botany.

[65]  K. Sand‐Jensen,et al.  Drag and reconfiguration of freshwater macrophytes , 2003 .

[66]  M. D. Stokes,et al.  Extreme water velocities: Topographical amplification of wave‐induced flow in the surf zone of rocky shores , 2003 .

[67]  M. Denny,et al.  The mechanics of wave-swept algae. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[68]  Iris Möller,et al.  Wave dissipation over macro-tidal saltmarshes: Effects of marsh edge typology and vegetation change , 2002, Journal of Coastal Research.

[69]  H. Nepf.  Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation , 1999 .

[70]  James R. Usherwood,et al.  Mechanical and anatomical adaptations in terrestrial and aquatic buttercups to their respective environments , 1997 .

[71]  G. van der Velde,et al.  Effects of waves on helophyte stands: mechanical characteristics of stems of Phragmites australis and Scirpus lacustris , 1996 .

[72]  Denny,et al.  EXTREME DRAG FORCES AND THE SURVIVAL OF WIND- AND WATER-SWEPT ORGANISMS , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[73]  P. Keddy,et al.  Species Competitive Ability and Position Along a Natural Stress/Disturbance Gradient , 1986 .

[74]  N. L. Biddington,et al.  The effects of mechanically-induced stress in plants — a review , 1986, Plant Growth Regulation.

[75]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Wave attenuation by flexible, idealized salt marsh vegetation , 2014 .

[76]  Marcel Zijlema,et al.  Wave dissipation by vegetation with layer schematization in SWAN , 2012 .

[77]  M. Westoby,et al.  Safety and streamlining of woody shoots in wind: an empirical study across 39 species in tropical Australia. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[78]  N. Anten,et al.  Terrestrial vs aquatic plants: how general is the drag tolerance-avoidance trade-off? , 2012, The New phytologist.

[79]  Benwei Shi,et al.  Wave Attenuation at a Salt Marsh Margin: A Case Study of an Exposed Coast on the Yangtze Estuary , 2011, Estuaries and Coasts.

[80]  V. Nikora,et al.  Biomechanical properties of aquatic plants and their effects on plant–flow interactions in streams and rivers , 2011, Aquatic Sciences.

[81]  M. Denny,et al.  Review The mechanics of wave-swept algae , 2002 .

[82]  S. Vogel.  Life in Moving Fluids: The Physical Biology of Flow , 1981 .