Supporting lifelong learners to build personal learning ecologies in daily physical spaces

This paper presents the results from a questionnaire filled out by 147 lifelong learners with the aim to analyse learning practices of adults, and to recognise patterns of lifelong learners in order to support them with technology. These patterns capture the context in which lifelong learners are more willing to learn, that is, the day of the week, duration, location activity being performed, type of device being used, way to interact with their devices and how these aspects can affect when an adult student takes the initiative to learn. Likewise, this paper examines previous publications on surveys, questionnaires and information collected with the same objective, to corroborate and contrast the findings. Moreover, we present a literature review on augmented tangibles for learning identifying potential contexts to orchestrate tangibles depending on the physical space where they are normally used. As an outcome of this work, important research questions are raised to integrate smart learning objects in learner-centred ecologies of resources.

[1]  Jiao Jian-li Literature Review in Learning with Tangible Technologies , 2008 .

[2]  Eszter Ozsvald Embedded soft material displays , 2012, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[3]  Mike Sharples,et al.  KLeOS: a personal, mobile, knowledge and learning organisation system , 2002, Proceedings. IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education.

[4]  Fabian Hemmert,et al.  Living interfaces: the impatient toaster , 2009, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[5]  Tomas Sokoler,et al.  Social yoga mats: designing for exercising/socializing synergy , 2012, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[6]  Z. Diénès Building Up Mathematics , 1960 .

[7]  Tatsuo Nakajima,et al.  Prottoy Middleware Platform for Smart Object Systems , 2008 .

[8]  Lars Erik Holmquist,et al.  Token-Based Acces to Digital Information , 1999, HUC.

[9]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  An Empirical Study of Use Contexts in the Mobile Internet, Focusing on the Usability of Information Architecture , 2005, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[10]  A. Tough The adult's learning projects : a fresh approach to theory and practice in adult learning , 1979 .

[11]  Liza Stark SnapToTrace: a new e-textile interface and component kit for learning computation , 2012, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[12]  Tomas Sokoler,et al.  Integrating physiotherapy with everyday life: exploring the space of possibilities through ReHandles , 2012, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[13]  BT Bilişim,et al.  Portland Pattern Repository , 2011 .

[14]  Ofcom International communications market report 2015 , 2015 .

[15]  Fabian Hemmert,et al.  Living interfaces: the thrifty faucet , 2009, TEI.

[16]  Orit Shaer,et al.  Smart Blocks: a tangible mathematical manipulative , 2007, TEI.

[17]  Marco Kalz,et al.  Beyond the channel: A literature review on ambient displays for learning , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Lionel Touseau,et al.  Combining heterogeneous service technologies for building an Internet of Things middleware , 2012, Comput. Commun..

[19]  Lora Aroyo,et al.  PillowTalk: can we afford intimacy? , 2007, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[20]  Wim Westera,et al.  Fostering Reflective Practice with Mobile Technologies , 2012, ARTEL@EC-TEL.

[21]  Ana M. Bernardos,et al.  Enhancing interaction with smart objects through mobile devices , 2011, MobiWac '11.

[22]  Larry Johnson,et al.  NMC Horizon Report: 2009 Australia-New Zealand Edition , 2009 .

[23]  Derek F. Reilly,et al.  Limber: DIY wearables for reducing risk of office injury , 2012, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[24]  Marco Kalz,et al.  ARLearn: Augmented Reality Meets Augmented Virtuality , 2012, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[25]  Stefaan Ternier,et al.  OER in the Mobile Era: Content Repositories’ Features for Mobile Devices and Future Trends , 2012 .

[26]  Lung-Hsiang Wong,et al.  A learner-centric view of mobile seamless learning , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[27]  Allen Tough,et al.  The adult's learning projects , 1979 .

[28]  Fabian Hemmert,et al.  Living interfaces: the intimate door lock , 2009, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[29]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[30]  Hiroaki Kimura,et al.  Reflecting human behavior to motivate desirable lifestyle , 2008, DIS '08.

[31]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Lifelong learning—more than training , 2000 .

[32]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Design patterns for complex learning , 2006 .

[33]  Davinia Hernández Leo,et al.  SOS: Orchestrating Collaborative Activities across Digital and Physical Spaces Using Wearable Signaling Devices , 2012, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[34]  Takeo Igarashi,et al.  DressUp: a 3D interface for clothing design with a physical mannequin , 2012, TEI.

[35]  A. Dehmel Making a European area of lifelong learning a reality? Some critical reflections on the European Union’s lifelong learning policies , 2006 .

[36]  Jean-Philippe Vasseur,et al.  Interconnecting Smart Objects with IP: The Next Internet , 2010 .

[37]  Graham Attwell,et al.  Personal Learning Environments - the future of eLearning? , 2007 .

[38]  Orit Shaer,et al.  The tangible video editor: collaborative video editing with active tokens , 2007, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[39]  M. van Harmelen Personal Learning Environments , 2006 .

[40]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Context-aware kitchen utilities , 2007, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[41]  Johanna Schmeer,et al.  Touch trace mirror: asynchronous, collaborative messaging as a concept for creating a relatedness experience , 2010, TEI.

[42]  Bernardo Tabuenca A questionnaire for lifelong learners on mobile usage habits , 2012 .

[43]  Maria Montessori,et al.  The Advanced Montessori Method , 1991 .

[44]  Michael S. Horn,et al.  Representing equality: a tangible balance beam for early algebra education , 2011, IDC.