Effects of field area and configuration on chromatic and border discriminations

Visual discrimination was tested with juxtaposed fields that differed only in luminance, S cone excitation, or the ratio of L to M cone excitation. Observers were asked to make discriminations based upon a criterion of color difference or of the perception of a border between fields. The area of the fields was varied either by increasing the length of their common junction or by increasing their widths at constant junction length. For fields larger than 0.2-0.4 deg2, area controls sensitivity. For smaller fields, discrimination may be worse for narrow fields with long common junctions than for wide ones with small common junctions, especially for discriminations that depend upon S cones, in which the field components tend to become spatially integrated. Decreasing viewing time reduces the magnitude of this effect. S cone and L-M channel acuities were estimated at about 7 and 32 c/deg, respectively.

[1]  K. Mullen.  The contrast sensitivity of human colour vision to red‐green and blue‐yellow chromatic gratings. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  C. Cavonius,et al.  Contrast sensitivity of individual colour mechanisms of human vision. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  P L Walraven,et al.  A closer look at the tritanopic convergence point. , 1974, Vision research.

[4]  G. Brindley,et al.  The summation areas of human colour‐receptive mechanisms at increment threshold , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm , 1975, Vision Research.

[6]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Equiluminance: spatial and temporal factors and the contribution of blue-sensitive cones. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  Robert M. Boynton,et al.  16 – Ten Years of Research with the Minimally Distinct Border1 , 1978 .

[8]  J. Mollon,et al.  An anomaly in the response of the eye to light of short wavelengths. , 1977, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  Mary Hayhoe,et al.  The gap effect: Chromatic and achromatic visual discrimination as affected by field separation , 1977 .

[10]  E. M. Granger,et al.  Visual chromaticity-modulation transfer function , 1973 .

[11]  D. W. Heeley,et al.  Cardinal directions of color space , 1982, Vision Research.

[12]  D. H. Kelly.  Spatiotemporal variation of chromatic and achromatic contrast thresholds. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[13]  Leo Maurice Hurvich,et al.  Color vision , 1981 .

[14]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Blue cones contribute to border distinctness , 1985, Vision Research.

[15]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Spatiotemporal chromaticity discrimination. , 1969, Journal of the Optical Society of America.