The general public's use of (and attitudes towards) interactive, personal digital health information and advisory services

Examines statistically the public's use and attitudes towards interactive and personal health services via an online questionnaire survey and enhances these data with an expert assessment of a number of consumer health sites and their services. Over a period of three weeks more than 1,300 people responded to an online questionnaire produced by The British Life and Internet Project. Of the respondents, 81 per cent were British. The likely potential uptake figure for support group participation among Internet health users is about 20 per cent while around 11 to 13 per cent will go online to describe a medical condition. Those in poor heath were approximately ten to 13 times more likely to have participated in an online support group. Those aged over 65 were four times as likely to e‐mail their doctor. More positive health outcomes were associated with those respondents that participated in online support groups and the least number of health outcomes were associated with those people that maintained e‐mail contact with a doctor or surgery.

[1]  Peter Williams,et al.  Broadband nursing: A multi-method evaluation of a one-way video-conferencing health information and advice service: "InVision" , 2003, J. Documentation.

[2]  G Eysenbach,et al.  Patients looking for information on the Internet and seeking teleadvice: motivation, expectations, and misconceptions as expressed in e-mails sent to physicians. , 1999, Archives of dermatology.

[3]  Fiona Stewart,et al.  Internet Communication and Qualitative Research , 2000 .

[4]  Jason E. Owen,et al.  Investigation of the effects of gender and preparation on quality of communication in Internet support groups , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  D. Ford,et al.  Doctors Who Are Using E-mail With Their Patients: a Qualitative Exploration , 2003, Journal of medical Internet research.

[6]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[7]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Towards ethical guidelines for dealing with unsolicited patient emails and giving teleadvice in the absence of a pre-existing patient-physician relationship — systematic review and expert survey , 2000, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  Sasha Shepperd,et al.  Against internet exceptionalism , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  White Mh,et al.  Online support for caregivers. Analysis of an Internet Alzheimer mailgroup. , 2000 .

[10]  Adam P. Dicker,et al.  A survey to evaluate patients’ perspective concerning e-mail in an oncology practice , 2001 .

[11]  P. Klemm,et al.  Online Cancer Support Groups: A Review of the Research Literature , 2003, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[12]  P. Klemm,et al.  Gender differences on Internet cancer support groups. , 1999, Computers in nursing.

[13]  R. J. Cline,et al.  Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. , 2001, Health education research.

[14]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[15]  Joshua Fogel,et al.  Internet use and social Support in women with breast cancer , 2002 .

[16]  Hae-Ra Han,et al.  Computer-mediated support group use among parents of children with cancer--an exploratory study. , 2001, Computers in nursing.

[17]  A. Jacobson,et al.  What attracts patients with diabetes to an internet support group? A 21‐month longitudinal website study , 2001, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[18]  L. Baker,et al.  Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. , 2003, JAMA.

[19]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Beyond hearing: Where the real-world and online support meet. , 2002 .

[20]  M. White,et al.  Receiving social support online: implications for health education. , 2001, Health education research.