Design and standardisation of XBRL solutions for governance and transparency

The eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) is an XML-based, de facto standard for the dissemination of metadata associated with business reporting information. The standard allows parties to build reporting solutions within a wide variety of information value chains. The standard provides considerable flexibility in the way those parties construct those services. The XBRL specification provides a framework upon which those that wish to develop an XBRL-based reporting environment then build. XBRL taxonomies provide metadata about reporting concepts. Instance documents, aligned with those taxonomies, report facts and provide entity-specific metadata. The XBRL specification constrains taxonomy design but within these constraints, developers have very wide discretion. This inherent flexibility creates challenges to information providers, intermediaries and consumers. Designers must balance flexibility, transparency, reliability and cost. We provide four XBRL use cases to illustrate these challenges. We further analyse these issues in a case study of the prudential supervision of financial institutions in Europe with the COREP framework. The COREP taxonomy was the first to employ the dimensional XBRL specification. The dimensional specification allows for the reporting of data in a hypercube modelled in a taxonomy. The hypercubes in the COREP taxonomy allow for breakdowns of solvency reporting into their constituent structures. The COREP hypercube structures are highly complex. Meeting objectives for flexibility, national prudential regulators are able to make national extensions to the foundational COREP taxonomy. As a result, we observe considerable national variation in calculation relationships and in dimensional structures. Radically different data models contribute to the inconsistencies among the various national taxonomies within the overall COREP framework. We show how this flexibility in multiple taxonomy design across different European countries has created challenges for information providers and difficulties for information consumers seeking to assess institutions across national borders. We make recommendations on the balancing of needs for flexibility and data compatibility within taxonomy design.

[1]  E. Carayannis,et al.  “New” vs. “old” economy: insights on competitiveness in the global IT industry , 2001 .

[2]  Bhavani Thuraisingham,et al.  A NEW VIEW OF INFORMATION MODELING , 1992 .

[3]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Installed base and compatibility : innovation, product preannouncements and predation , 1986 .

[4]  B. Rost Basel Committee On Banking Supervision , 2010 .

[5]  Eric E. Cohen,et al.  XBRL: The standardised business language for 21st century reporting and governance , 2005 .

[6]  C. William Thomas,et al.  Test-Driving the Codification: Accounting Research on the Fast Track , 2008 .

[7]  Knut Blind Factors influencing the lifetime of telecommunication and information technology standards: results of an explorative analysis of the perinorm database , 2005, The 4th Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, 2005..

[8]  Karen Kernan XBRL around the World: A Look beyond U.S. Shores to Put the SEC'S Interactive Data Initiative in a Global Context , 2008 .

[9]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Interorganizational System Standards Development in Vertical Industries , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[10]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Information Modeling in the Time of the Revolution , 1998, Inf. Syst..

[11]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Vertical E-Business Standards and Standards Developing Organizations: A Conceptual Framework , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[12]  J. Choi Herd Behavior, the "Penguin Effect", and the Suppression of Informational Diffusion: An Analysis of Informational Externalities and Payoff Interdependency , 1997 .

[13]  Sally Rao Hill,et al.  Drivers and Inhibitors to XBRL adoption: A Qualitative Approach to Build a Theory in Under-Researched Areas , 2007, Int. J. E Bus. Res..

[14]  Susan P. Williams,et al.  Online business reporting: An information management perspective , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[15]  M. Soekijad,et al.  Conditions for knowledge sharing in competitive alliances , 2003 .

[16]  Carsten Felden,et al.  New Dimensions of Business Reporting and XBRL , 2007 .

[17]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Comparing the Standards Lens with Other Perspectives on IS Innovations: The Case of CPFR , 2006, Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res..

[18]  Knut Blind,et al.  Trends in ICT standards: The relationship between European standardisation bodies and standards consortia , 2008 .

[19]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Industry-Wide Information Systems Standardization as Collective Action: The Case of the U.S. Residential Mortgage Industry , 2006, MIS Q..

[20]  Daniel Beimborn,et al.  A Unified Economic Model of Standard Diffusion: The Impact of Standardization Cost, Network Effects, and Network Topology , 2006, MIS Q..

[21]  Yair Wand,et al.  Emancipating instances from the tyranny of classes in information modeling , 2000, TODS.

[22]  Roger Debreceny,et al.  The production and use of semantically rich accounting reports on the Internet: XML and XBRL , 2001, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .