Biomimetics—using nature to inspire human innovation

Evolution has resolved many of nature's challenges leading to lasting solutions. Nature has always inspired human achievements and has led to effective materials, structures, tools, mechanisms, processes, algorithms, methods, systems, and many other benefits (Bar-Cohen Y (ed) 2005 Biomimetics-Biologically Inspired Technologies (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press) pp 1-552). This field, which is known as biomimetics, offers enormous potential for inspiring new capabilities for exciting future technologies. There are numerous examples of biomimetic successes that involve making simple copies, such as the use of fins for swimming. Others examples involved greater mimicking complexity including the mastery of flying that became possible only after the principles of aerodynamics were better understood. Some commercial implementations of biomimetics, including robotic toys and movie subjects, are increasingly appearing and behaving like living creatures. More substantial benefits of biomimetics include the development of prosthetics that closely mimic real limbs and sensory-enhancing microchips that are interfaced with the brain to assist in hearing, seeing and controlling instruments. A review is given of selected areas that were inspired by nature, and an outlook for potential development in biomimetics is presented.

[1]  W. Megill,et al.  TITAN: a conducting polymer based microfluidic pump , 2005 .

[2]  Stewart Sherrit,et al.  Enabling novel planetary and terrestrial mechanisms using electroactive materials at the JPL's NDEAA Lab , 2004 .

[3]  Roger T. Hanlon,et al.  Crypsis, conspicuousness, mimicry and polyphenism as antipredator defences of foraging octopuses on Indo-Pacific coral reefs, with a method of quantifying crypsis from video tapes , 1999 .

[4]  R. Full,et al.  Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Y. Vlasov,et al.  Non-selective chemical sensors in analytical chemistry: from “electronic nose” to “electronic tongue” , 1998 .

[6]  Zvi Drezner,et al.  Genetic Algorithms: Mimicking Evolution and Natural Selection in Optimization Models , 2005 .

[7]  Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos,et al.  Brain-machine interface: Instant neural control of a movement signal , 2002, Nature.

[8]  K. Autumn,et al.  Mechanisms of Adhesion in Geckos1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[9]  H. Eto,et al.  Electronic noses-development and future prospects , 2022 .

[10]  Yoseph Bar-Cohen,et al.  Artificial Muscles Using Electroactive Polymers , 2005 .

[11]  Julian F. V. Vincent,et al.  Stealing Ideas from Nature , 2001 .

[12]  W. Bialek,et al.  Physical limits to sensation and perception. , 1987, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[13]  Sean Moran,et al.  Biological Materials in Engineering Mechanisms , 2005 .

[14]  Minoru Taya,et al.  Nastic Structures: The Enacting and Mimicking of Plant Movements , 2005 .

[15]  James D. Weiland,et al.  Interfacing Microelectronics and the Human Visual System , 2005 .

[16]  R. Bert.  The New Science of Strong Materials: or Why You Don't Fall through the Floor , 2006 .

[17]  J. Vincent,et al.  Defense and Attack Strategies and Mechanisms in Biology , 2005 .

[18]  Yoseph Bar-Cohen,et al.  Current and future developments in artificial muscles using electroactive polymers , 2005, Expert review of medical devices.

[19]  Richard Heydt,et al.  Application of Dielectric Elastomer EAP Actuators , 2004 .

[20]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[21]  George Luger,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: Structures and Strategies for Complex Problem Solving (5th Edition) , 2004 .

[22]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Evolutionary Robotics and Open-Ended Design Automation , 2005 .

[23]  Robert Hecht-Nielsen,et al.  Mechanization of Cognition , 2005 .

[24]  J W Gardner and P N Bartlett,et al.  Electronic Noses: Principles and Applications , 1999 .

[25]  Luke P. Lee,et al.  Biologically Inspired Optical Systems , 2005 .

[26]  T A Dickinson,et al.  Current trends in 'artificial-nose' technology. , 1998, Trends in biotechnology.

[27]  Zvi Drezner,et al.  Genetic Algorithms: Mimicking Evolution and Natural Selection in Optimization Models , 2005 .

[28]  Ricardo Gutierrez-Osuna,et al.  The how and why of electronic noses , 1998 .

[29]  Daniel C. Mattis,et al.  The New Science of Strong Materials, or, Why You Don’t Fall Through the Floor , 1985 .

[30]  Julian W. Gardner,et al.  Electronic noses — development and future prospects , 1996 .

[31]  Y. Cohen.  Electroactive Polymer (EAP) Actuators as Artificial Muscles - Reality , 2001 .

[32]  S. Meagher.  Instant neural control of a movement signal , 2002 .

[33]  Yoseph Bar-Cohen,et al.  Biomimetics : Biologically Inspired Technologies , 2011 .

[34]  Y. Dzenis,et al.  Spinning Continuous Fibers for Nanotechnology , 2004, Science.

[35]  Howard C. Hughes.  Sensory Exotica: A World beyond Human Experience , 1999 .

[36]  Jerald D. Kralik,et al.  Real-time prediction of hand trajectory by ensembles of cortical neurons in primates , 2000, Nature.

[37]  Yoseph Bar-Cohen,et al.  Electroactive Polymer (EAP) Actuators as Artificial Muscles: Reality, Potential, and Challenges, Second Edition , 2004 .

[38]  R. Andersen,et al.  Cognitive Control Signals for Neural Prosthetics , 2004, Science.

[39]  Stephen Mann,et al.  Biomimetic Materials Chemistry , 1995 .

[40]  R. Axel,et al.  A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition , 1991, Cell.

[41]  Sandro Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Neural engineering: Real brains for real robots , 2000, Nature.