Time Flies When You’re Having Approach-Motivated Fun

Time flies when you’re having fun, but what is it about pleasant experiences that makes time seem to go by faster? In the experiments reported here, we tested the proposal that approach motivation causes perceptual shortening of time during pleasant experiences. Relative to a neutral state or a positive state with low approach motivation (Experiment 1), a positive state with high approach motivation shortened perceptions of time. Also, individual differences in approach motivation predicted shorter perceptions of time. In Experiment 2, we manipulated approach motivation independently of the affective state and showed that increasing approach motivation caused time to be perceived as passing more quickly. In Experiment 3, we showed that positive approach motivation, as opposed to arousal, shortens perception of time by comparing a highly arousing positive state with a highly arousing negative state. Shortening of time perception in appetitive states may prolong approach-motivated behavior and increase the likelihood of acquiring appetitive objects or goals.

[1]  R. Davidson,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  A. Bakker,et al.  Positive Emotions , 2011 .

[3]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  You’re Having Fun When Time Flies , 2010, Psychological science.

[4]  Sylvie Droit-Volet,et al.  Anger and time perception in children. , 2007, Emotion.

[5]  A. Angrilli,et al.  The influence of affective factors on time perception , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  Relative left frontal activation to appetitive stimuli: considering the role of individual differences. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[7]  B. Parkinson,et al.  Emotion and motivation , 1995 .

[8]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  Late positive potential to appetitive stimuli and local attentional bias. , 2010, Emotion.

[9]  S. Droit-Volet,et al.  The time–emotion paradox , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Tom F. Price,et al.  Leaning embodies desire: Evidence that leaning forward increases relative left frontal cortical activation to appetitive stimuli , 2011, Biological Psychology.

[11]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Social psychological methods in emotion elicitation , 2007 .

[12]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. , 1994, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[13]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Handbook of Emotions , 1993 .

[14]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Left frontal cortical activation and spreading of alternatives: tests of the action-based model of dissonance. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  R. Ragot,et al.  How emotional auditory stimuli modulate time perception. , 2007, Emotion.

[16]  Piotr Winkielman,et al.  Social neuroscience : integrating biological and psychological explanations of social behavior , 2007 .

[17]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Approach motivational body postures lean toward left frontal brain activity. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[18]  A. Einstein.  Relativity: The Special and the General Theory , 2015 .

[19]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  BRIEF REPORT Perception of the duration of emotional events , 2004 .

[20]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  The Effect of Personal Relevance and Approach-Related Action Expectation on Relative Left Frontal Cortical Activity , 2006, Psychological science.

[21]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  Approach-Motivated Positive Affect Reduces Breadth of Attention , 2008, Psychological science.

[22]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Neurally reconstructing expected utility , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[23]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  Neural Activity Underlying the Effect of Approach-Motivated Positive Affect on Narrowed Attention , 2009, Psychological science.

[24]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  The motivational dimensional model of affect: Implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation , 2010 .

[25]  S. Droit-Volet,et al.  Time perception, depression and sadness , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[26]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Attentional Consequences of Pregoal and Postgoal Positive Affects Motivational Intensity in Affects , 2022 .

[27]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  Incorporating motivational intensity and direction into the study of emotions: implications for brain mechanisms of emotion and cognition-emotion interactions , 2008 .

[28]  S. Droit-Volet,et al.  How liked and disliked foods affect time perception. , 2009, Emotion.

[29]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  The effect of low versus high approach-motivated positive affect on memory for peripherally versus centrally presented information. , 2010, Emotion.

[30]  J. Brehm,et al.  The intensity of motivation. , 1989, Annual review of psychology.

[31]  G. E. Wimmer,et al.  Reward: Neural Circuitry for Social Valuation. , 2007 .

[32]  Jason Tipples,et al.  Time flies when we read taboo words , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.