Exploring Coreference Uncertainty of Generically Extracted Event Mentions

Because event mentions in text may be referentially ambiguous, event coreferentiality often involves uncertainty. In this paper we consider event coreference uncertainty and explore how it is affected by the context. We develop a supervised event coreference resolution model based on the comparison of generically extracted event mentions. We analyse event coreference uncertainty in both human annotations and predictions of the model, and in both within-document and cross-document setting. We frame event coreference as a classification task when full context is available and no uncertainty is involved, and a regression task in a limited context setting that involves uncertainty. We show how a rich set of features based on argument comparison can be utilized in both settings. Experimental results on English data suggest that our approach is especially suitable for resolving cross-document event coreference. Results also suggest that modelling human coreference uncertainty in the case of limited context is feasible.

[1]  Angel X. Chang,et al.  SUTime: A library for recognizing and normalizing time expressions , 2012, LREC.

[2]  Jan Snajder,et al.  TakeLab: Systems for Measuring Semantic Text Similarity , 2012, *SEMEVAL.

[3]  Ralph Weischedel,et al.  Unrestricted Coreference: Identifying Entities and Events in OntoNotes , 2007 .

[4]  Jian Su,et al.  A Unified Event Coreference Resolution by Integrating Multiple Resolvers , 2011, IJCNLP.

[5]  Breck Baldwin,et al.  Cross-Document Event Coreference: Annotations, Experiments, and Observations , 1999, COREF@ACL.

[6]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[7]  Anette Frank,et al.  Aligning Predicate Argument Structures in Monolingual Comparable Texts: A New Corpus for a New Task , 2012, *SEMEVAL.

[8]  Eneko Agirre,et al.  SemEval-2012 Task 6: A Pilot on Semantic Textual Similarity , 2012, *SEMEVAL.

[9]  Robert J. Gaizauskas,et al.  Event coreference for information extraction , 1997 .

[10]  Sanda M. Harabagiu,et al.  A Linguistic Resource for Discovering Event Structures and Resolving Event Coreference , 2008, LREC.

[11]  David Ahn,et al.  The stages of event extraction , 2006 .

[12]  Martha Palmer,et al.  Verb Semantics and Lexical Selection , 1994, ACL.

[13]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Incorporating Non-local Information into Information Extraction Systems by Gibbs Sampling , 2005, ACL.

[14]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  TimeML: Robust Specification of Event and Temporal Expressions in Text , 2003, New Directions in Question Answering.

[15]  Sanda M. Harabagiu,et al.  Unsupervised Event Coreference Resolution with Rich Linguistic Features , 2010, ACL.

[16]  Josef Ruppenhofer,et al.  FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice , 2006 .

[17]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Stanford typed dependencies manual , 2010 .

[18]  Xingchen Heng,et al.  Specifying and Verifying Cases Retrieval System Combining Event B and Spin , 2007 .