Satisfaction of search errors detecting subtle fractures diminish in the presence of more serious injuries

Satisfaction of search (SOS) occurs when an abnormality is missed because another abnormality has been detected in radiology examinations. This research includes our study of whether the severity of a detected fracture determines whether subsequent fractures are overlooked. Each of 70 simulated multitrauma patients presented radiographs of three anatomic areas. Readers evaluated each patient under two experimental conditions: when the images of the first anatomic area included a severe fracture (the SOS condition), and when it did not (the control condition). The SOS effect was measured on detection accuracy for subtle test fractures presented on examinations of the second or third anatomic areas. SOS reduction in ROC area for detecting subtle test fractures with the addition of a major fracture to the first radiograph was not observed. The same absence of SOS that had been observed when high-morbidity added fractures were presented on CT was replicated with the high-morbidity added fractures presented on radiographs. This finding rules out the possibility that there was no SOS in the prior study with CT because SOS effects do not extend from one imaging modality to another. Taken together, the evidence rejects the hypothesis that the severity of a detected fracture determines the SOS for subsequently viewed fractures.

[1]  S. Hillis A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysis , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  Edmund A Franken,et al.  Satisfaction of search in multitrauma patients: severity of detected fractures. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[3]  F. Earnest,et al.  Understanding interpretive errors in radiologists learning computed tomography colonography. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[4]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[5]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[6]  Stephen L Hillis,et al.  Monte Carlo validation of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method using normalized pseudovalues and less data-based model simplification. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[7]  K S Berbaum,et al.  Monte Carlo validation of a multireader method for receiver operating characteristic discrete rating data: factorial experimental design. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[8]  W. Dixon,et al.  BMDP statistical software , 1983 .

[9]  Kevin S. Berbaum,et al.  A contaminated binormal model for ROC data , 2000 .

[10]  Stephen L Hillis,et al.  Power estimation for the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[11]  John A. Campbell Error and Variation in Diagnostic Radiology , 1968 .

[12]  Lorenzo L. Pesce,et al.  Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[13]  Lee F. Rogers,et al.  Common oversights in the evaluation of the patient with multiple injuries , 2004, Skeletal Radiology.

[14]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  A comparison of the Dorfman–Berbaum–Metz and Obuchowski–Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  L. F. Rogers Radiology Of Skeletal Trauma , 1982 .

[16]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Gaze dwell times on acute trauma injuries missed because of satisfaction of search. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[17]  Michael H Lev,et al.  Avoidance of variability and error in radiology , 1999, The Lancet.

[18]  L. Berlin,et al.  Malpractice issues in radiology. Perceptual errors. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Judy A. Bean,et al.  Diagnostic errors by radiology residents in interpreting pediatric radiographs in an emergency setting , 2004, Pediatric Radiology.

[20]  Kevin S. Berbaum,et al.  Satisfaction of search for subtle skeletal fractures may not be induced by more serious skeletal injury. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[21]  A E Voytovich,et al.  Premature conclusions in diagnostic reasoning. , 1985, Journal of medical education.

[22]  Harold L Kundel,et al.  History of research in medical image perception. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[23]  H L Kundel,et al.  Blinded review of retrospectively visible unreported breast cancers: an eye-position analysis. , 2001, Radiology.

[24]  O. Clark West,et al.  Cervical spine trauma radiography: Sources of false-negative diagnoses , 1997, Emergency Radiology.

[25]  K S Berbaum,et al.  A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part II. A formal model. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[26]  Kevin S. Berbaum,et al.  Missed fractures resulting from satisfaction of search effect , 1994, Emergency Radiology.

[27]  J COENEGRACHTS,et al.  [Diagnostic errors]. , 1952, Revue medicale de Liege.

[28]  L F Rogers,et al.  Evaluating the multiply injured patient radiographically. , 1990, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[29]  C. Metz,et al.  "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation. , 1999, Journal of mathematical psychology.