Use of ANNs as Classifiers for Selective Attention Brain-Computer Interfaces

Selective attention to visual-spatial stimuli causes decrements of power in alpha band and increments in beta. For steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) selective attention affects electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings, modulating the power in the range 8-27 Hz. The same behaviour can be seen for auditory stimuli as well, although for auditory steady-state response (ASSR), it is not fully confirmed yet. The design of selective attention based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) has two major advantages: First, no much training is needed. Second, if properly designed, a steady-state response corresponding to spectral peaks can be elicited, easy to filter and classify. In this paper we study the behaviour of ANNs as classifiers for a selective attention to auditory stimuli based BCI system.

[1]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[2]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The BCI competition 2003: progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Terence W Picton,et al.  Multiple Auditory Steady-State Responses , 2002, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[4]  David L. Braff Handbook of Psychophysiology, 2nd ed. , 2001 .

[5]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .

[6]  Wei Wu,et al.  Frequency Recognition Based on Canonical Correlation Analysis for SSVEP-Based BCIs , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Design and implementation of a brain-computer interface with high transfer rates , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  J D Bayliss,et al.  A virtual reality testbed for brain-computer interface research. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  C M Gómez,et al.  Temporal evolution of alpha and beta bands during visual spatial attention. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  J Pernier,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms of auditory selective attention in humans. , 2000, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[11]  Juhani Partanen,et al.  Selective attention event-related potential effects from auditory novel stimuli in children and adults , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  Wei Wu,et al.  Frequency recognition based on canonical correlation analysis for SSVEP-based BCIs , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  S. Makeig,et al.  A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Effects of spatial selective attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20-28 Hz range. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[15]  C M Gómez,et al.  Frequency analysis of the EEG during spatial selective attention. , 1998, The International journal of neuroscience.

[16]  María Cecilia Pérez Abalo,et al.  Los potenciales evocados auditivos de estado estable a múltiples frecuencias y su valor en la evaluación objetiva de la audición , 2021 .

[17]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed.). , 2000 .

[18]  Carlos M. Gómez,et al.  Temporal evolution of α and β bands during visual spatial attention , 2001 .

[19]  Simon P. Kelly,et al.  Visual spatial attention control in an independent brain-computer interface , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.