相关论文

Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions

Abstract:Prior research has provided valuable insights into how and why employees make a decision about the adoption and use of information technologies (ITs) in the workplace. From an organizational point of view, however, the more important issue is how managers make informed decisions about interventions that can lead to greater acceptance and effective utilization of IT. There is limited research in the IT implementation literature that deals with the role of interventions to aid such managerial decision making. Particularly, there is a need to understand how various interventions can influence the known determinants of IT adoption and use. To address this gap in the literature, we draw from the vast body of research on the technology acceptance model (TAM), particularly the work on the determinants of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, and: (i) develop a comprehensive nomological network (integrated model) of the determinants of individual level (IT) adoption and use; (ii) empirically test the proposed integrated model; and (iii) present a research agenda focused on potential pre- and postimplementation interventions that can enhance employees' adoption and use of IT. Our findings and research agenda have important implications for managerial decision making on IT implementation in organizations.

摘要:先前的研究为员工如何以及为什么在工作场所采用和使用信息技术(ITS)做出决策提供了有价值的见解。然而,从组织的角度来看,更重要的问题是管理人员如何在知情的情况下做出干预决策,从而更好地接受和有效利用信息技术。在信息技术实施文献中,涉及干预措施的作用以帮助这类管理决策的研究有限。特别是,有必要了解各种干预措施如何影响信息技术采用和使用的已知决定因素。为了解决文献中的这一差距,我们借鉴了大量关于技术接受模型(TAM)的研究,特别是关于感知的有用性和感知的易用性决定因素的工作,并且:(I)开发个人水平(IT)采用和使用的决定因素的综合法理网络(集成模型);(Ii)经验性地测试所提出的集成模型;以及(Iii)提出关注潜在的实施前和实施后干预措施的研究议程,以提高员工对IT的采用和使用。我们的研究结果和研究议程对组织中信息技术实施的管理决策具有重要影响。

参考文献

[1]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Research Note. Electronic Brainstorming: Illusions and Patterns of Productivity , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[4]  J. Bargh,et al.  The psychology of action : linking cognition and motivation to behavior , 1999 .

[5]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[7]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Shaping UP for E-Commerce: Institutional Enablers of the Organizational Assimliation of Web Technologies , 2002, MIS Q..

[8]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Toward preprototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[9]  Thomas K. Landauer,et al.  Trouble with Computers: Usefulness, Usability, and Productivity , 1996 .

[10]  Pamela E. Carter,et al.  A Comprehensive Conceputalization of the Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with IT-Enabled Work Systems , 2005 .

[11]  Grady Booch,et al.  When bad things happen to good projects , 1994 .

[12]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[13]  Ben Light,et al.  A Critical Success Factors Model for ERP Implementation , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[14]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[15]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[16]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[17]  Charles Chowa,et al.  Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The Effects of Interruptions, Task Complexity, and Information Presentation on Computer-Supported Decision-Making Performance , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[19]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[20]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[21]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[22]  情報サービス産業協会国際部 国際 Digital Planet 2000: The Global Information Economy(抄訳) , 2001 .

[23]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[24]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[25]  M. Macy,et al.  FROM FACTORS TO ACTORS: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling , 2002 .

[26]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Improving computer skill training: behavior modeling, symbolic mental rehearsal, and the role of knowledge structures. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Comment on Benbasat and Barki's "Quo Vadis TAM" article , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of DSS, Cognitive Effort, and Incentives on Strategy Selection , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  Dorwin Cartwright,et al.  Studies in Social Power. , 1960 .

[31]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[32]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[33]  Richard,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace , 2022 .

[34]  R. Vallerand Toward A Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation , 1997 .

[35]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  Dynamics of action identification: Volatility and structure in the mental representation of behavior. , 1996 .

[36]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Marios Koufaris,et al.  Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  H. Kelman Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[39]  AgarwalRitu,et al.  Reconceptualizing compatability beliefs in technology acceptance research , 2006 .

[40]  Blake Ives,et al.  Executive Involvement and Participation in the Management of Information Technology , 1991, MIS Q..

[41]  Arun Rai,et al.  A Structural Model for CASE Adoption Behavior , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  M. Yadav How Buyers Evaluate Product Bundles: A Model of Anchoring and Adjustment , 1994 .

[43]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test , 2004, MIS Q..

[44]  Varun Grover,et al.  Examining the Impact of Interorganizational Systems on Process Efficiency and Sourcing Leverage in Buyer-Supplier Dyads , 2005, Decis. Sci..

[45]  Deepinder S. Bajwa,et al.  An Empirical Investigation into Factors Relating to the Adoption of Executive Information Systems: An Analysis of EIS for Collaboration and Decision Support* , 1997 .

[46]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[47]  J. Valacich,et al.  Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. , 1993 .

[48]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[49]  Venkatesh,et al.  Computer Technology Training in the Workplace: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Effect of Mood. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[50]  Lee Roy Beach,et al.  Image theory: Theoretical and empirical foundations. , 1998 .

[51]  Anson Seers,et al.  Team-member exchange quality: a new construct for role-making research , 1989 .

[52]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation , 1989 .

[53]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Understanding the Adoption of Multipurpose Information Appliances: The Case of Mobile Data Services , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[54]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Resistance to Information Technology Implementation , 2005, MIS Q..

[55]  H. Kelman PROCESSES OF OPINION CHANGE , 1961 .

[56]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[57]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  F. Strack,et al.  The Semantics of Anchoring , 2001 .

[59]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Moving Beyond Intentions and Toward the Theory of Trying: Effects of Work Environment and Gender on Post-Adoption Information Technology Use , 2005, MIS Q..

[60]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[61]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[63]  Fred D. Davis User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[64]  T. S. Raghu,et al.  Relative Performance of Incentive Mechanisms: Computational Modeling and Simulation of Delegated Investment Decisions , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[65]  P. R. Warshaw A New Model for Predicting Behavioral Intentions: An Alternative to Fishbein , 1980 .

[66]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness , 1993 .

[67]  Daniel E. Sichel,et al.  The Computer Revolution: An Economic Perspective , 1997 .

[68]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[69]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design - The Case for Incentive Alignment , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[70]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[71]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[72]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[73]  Rada Jf Information technology and services , 1986 .

[74]  Timothy Paul Cronan,et al.  On the Test-Retest Reliability of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Scales , 1993 .

[75]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, and Infusion , 1993, Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology.

[76]  V. Vroom Work and motivation , 1964 .

[77]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[78]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[79]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[80]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. , 1997 .

[81]  Henryk Sienkiewicz,et al.  Quo Vadis? , 1967, American Association of Industrial Nurses journal.

[82]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[83]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[84]  G. Johns The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[85]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[86]  Joel B. Cohen,et al.  Isolating Attitudinal and Normative Influences in Behavioral Intentions Models , 1979 .

[87]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[88]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Where To Go From Here? Thoughts on Future Directions for Research on Individual-Level Technology Adoption with a Focus on Decision Making , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[89]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  An Anchoring and Adjustment Model of Purchase Quantity Decisions , 1998 .

[90]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[91]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The Influence of Task Interruption on Individual Decision Making: An Information Overload Perspective , 1999 .

[92]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[93]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[94]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement , 1974 .

[95]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[96]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[97]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Dead Or Alive? The Development, Trajectory And Future Of Technology Adoption Research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[98]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaption , 2005, MIS Q..

[99]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in technology on social network str , 1990 .

[100]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design: The Case for Incentive Alignment , 2001 .

[101]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Training, Technical Complexity, and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation , 2007, MIS Q..

[102]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Technology Adoption by Groups: A Valence Perspective , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[103]  Jon Hartwick,et al.  The Impact of Automated Office Systems on Middle Managers and Their Work , 1987, MIS Q..

[104]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Training End Users: An Experimental Investigation of the Roles of the Computer Interface and Training Methods , 1993, MIS Q..

[105]  D. Whetten What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[106]  VenkateshViswanath Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use , 2000 .

[107]  Deepinder S. Bajwa,et al.  Key antecedents of Executive Information System success: a path analytic approach , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[108]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  Research Report: The Effectiveness of Multiple Dialogues in Electronic Brainstorming , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[109]  Craig M. Froehle,et al.  Service Personnel, Technology, and Their Interaction in Influencing Customer Satisfaction , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[110]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications , 1992 .

[111]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Management Support and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation , 2003, MIS Q..

[112]  P. Kidwell,et al.  The trouble with computers: Usefulness, usability and productivity , 1996, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[113]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Quo vadis TAM? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[114]  M. D. Dunnette Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[115]  C. Fornell,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics , 1981 .

[116]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[117]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[118]  J. Valacich,et al.  Idea Generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending to an Old Story , 1994 .

[119]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[120]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[121]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. , 1987 .

[122]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Facilitation, GSS, and Training as Sources of Process Restrictiveness and Guidance for Structured Group Decision Making: An Empirical Assessment , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[123]  Henri Barki,et al.  Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude , 1994, MIS Q..

[124]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation , 2001 .

[125]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

引用
Community Attitudes towards the Telecentre in Bario, Borneo Malaysia: 14 Years on
2012
The Acceptance of Social Networking as a Learning Tools at University of Bahrain
2014
Determinants of Actual Purchase on m-commerce Sites vs. Determinants of Satisfaction with m-commerce Sites
2016
The effect of Customer Relationship Management systems on firm performance
Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst.
2017
An Integrated BIM and Cost Estimating Blended Learning Model--Acceptance Differences between Experts and Novice.
2016
Factors affecting students’ acceptance of e-learning environments in developing countries:A structural equation modeling approach
2013
The effect of organizational support on ERP implementation
Ind. Manag. Data Syst.
2010
Impact of individualism and collectivism over the individual's technology acceptance behaviour: A multi-group analysis between Pakistan and Turkey
J. Enterp. Inf. Manag.
2015
A Multi-lingual Evaluation of the vAssist Spoken Dialog System. Comparing Disco and RavenClaw
IWSDS
2016
Ranking Different Factors which Affect e-Learning Outcomes
2012
Neglected Role of User in Prominent IS Models and Framework
2013
Behavioral Effects in Consumer Evaluations of Recommendation Systems
2010
A review of the evolution of research on information Technology Acceptance Model
2011 International Conference on Business Management and Electronic Information
2011
Information Technology (IT) Identity: A Conceptualization, Proposed Measures, and Research Agenda.
2012
A model for digital literacy enhancement through technology adoption in resource-constrained environments
2019
The use of Information and Communication Technology in Teaching and Learning within Higher Education Sector of a Small Island Developing State: The Case of the Maldives
2013
The Future Home is Wise, Not Smart
Computer Supported Cooperative Work
2015
eModeration adoption requirements for secondary school education: a critical literature review
2020 Conference on Information Communications Technology and Society (ICTAS)
2020
A Framework for Securing e-Government Services : The Case of Tanzania
2012
Modeling Technology Acceptance in E-Business Environments
2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on e-Business Engineering
2013