Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology
Abstract:Many EDI researchers and practitioners have recognized the importance of high penetration levels for the success of EDI. Unfortunately, such penetration is partly impeded by the resistance of small companies to become EDI capable. To investigate this issue, we identify three major factors that influence the EDI adoption practices of small firms. These factors are: organizational readiness (because of the low levels of IT sophistication and resource availability of small firms), external pressures to adopt (because of the weak market positions of small firms and the network nature of the technology), and perceived benefits (because of the limited impact that IT has on small firms due to under-utilization and lack of integration). By combining the anticipated effects of these factors, we developed a framework of EDI adoption by small businesses. The applicability of this framework is empirically demonstrated using the results of seven case studies. Lastly, recommendations are made for the development of successful EDI partner expansion plans. These include the development of a long term EDI partner expansion plan from the very beginning, the individual assessment of each partner's EDI preparedness level, and the selection of appropriate influence tactics to expedite adoption by small partners. Specifically, it is suggested that EDI initiators pursue promotional efforts to improve partners' perceptions of EDI benefits, provide financial and technological assistance to partners with low organizational readiness, and carefully select and enact influence strategies to reduce resistance.
摘要:许多电子数据交换研究人员和从业者已经认识到高渗透率对电子数据交换成功的重要性。不幸的是,这种渗透在一定程度上受到了小公司抵制成为EDI能力的阻碍。为了研究这一问题,我们确定了影响小企业采用EDI实践的三个主要因素。这些因素是:组织准备(因为小公司的IT成熟度和资源可获得性水平较低)、采用的外部压力(因为小公司的市场地位较弱和技术的网络性)以及感知的好处(因为信息技术对小公司的影响有限,因为利用不足和缺乏整合)。通过结合这些因素的预期影响,我们开发了一个小企业采用EDI的框架。利用7个案例研究的结果,对该框架的适用性进行了实证验证。最后,对制定成功的EDI合作伙伴扩展计划提出了建议。这些措施包括从一开始就制定长期的电子数据交换合作伙伴扩展计划,对每个合作伙伴的电子数据交换准备水平进行单独评估,以及选择适当的影响策略以加快小型合作伙伴的采用。具体地说,建议电子数据交换发起人开展宣传工作,改善合作伙伴对电子数据交换好处的看法,向组织准备程度较低的合作伙伴提供资金和技术援助,并仔细选择和制定影响战略,以减少阻力。
暂无分享,去 创建一个
[1] Robert N. Stern,et al. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .
[2] Louis Raymond,et al. The advantages of electronic data interchange , 1992, DATB.
[3] John O. Summers,et al. Interfirm Influence Strategies and Their Application within Distribution Channels , 1984 .
[4] Mark P. Sharfman,et al. Antecedents of Organizational Slack , 1988 .
[5] D. Rogers,et al. An investigation of information technology adoption : the impact of logistics structure and strategy , 1990 .
[6] M. A. Emmelhainz,et al. STRATEGIC ISSUES OF EDI IMPLEMENTATION , 1988 .
[7] H ClarkTheodore,et al. Interorganizational business process redesign , 1996 .
[8] Paul B. Cragg,et al. Small-Firm Computing: Motivators and Inhibitors , 1993, MIS Q..
[9] Snehamay Banerjee,et al. Electronic data interchange: Characteristics of users and nonusers , 1994, Inf. Manag..
[10] James I. Cash,et al. Interorganizational systems: An information society opportunity or threat? , 1985, Inf. Soc..
[11] Sudhir H. Kale,et al. Dealer dependence and influence strategies in a manufacturer-dealer dyad. , 1989 .
[12] T. K. Massey,et al. Computers in Small Business: A Case of Under-Utilization , 1986 .
[13] L. Bourgeois. On the Measurement of Organizational Slack , 1981 .
[14] George H. Thompson,et al. Electronic Data Interchange: A Total Management Guide , 1990 .
[15] A. Ibrahim,et al. Perceived Causes of Success in Small Business , 1986 .
[16] M. Morton,et al. Electronic data interchange: How much competitive advantage? , 1990 .
[17] K. Provan. Recognizing, Measuring, and Interpreting The Potential/Enacted Power Distinction In Organizational Research , 1980 .
[18] Izak Benbasat,et al. The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..
[19] Paul J. Hart,et al. Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange , 1997 .
[20] Paula M. C. Swatman,et al. A model of EDI integration and strategic business reengineering , 1994, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..
[21] Lyne Bouchard,et al. Decision Criteria in the Adoption of EDI , 1993, ICIS.
[22] Stephanie S. Barrett,et al. Inter-Organization Information Sharing Systems , 1982, MIS Q..
[23] R. O'Callaghan,et al. Adoption Correlates and Share Effects of Electronic Data Interchange Systems in Marketing Channels , 1992 .
[24] Jitendra V. Singh. Performance, Slack, and Risk Taking in Organizational Decision Making , 1986 .
[25] K. Eisenhardt. Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.
[26] S. Helper. How much has realliy changed between U.S. automakers and their suppliers , 1991 .
[27] S. Clark,et al. EDI Adoption and Implementation: A Focus on Interorganizational Linkages , 1992 .
[28] Hagen K. C. Pfeiffer,et al. The Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange , 1992 .
[29] Izak Benbasat,et al. An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing the Success of Customer-Oriented Strategic Systems , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..
[30] Paula M. C. Swatman,et al. EDI System Integration: A Definition and Literature Survey , 1992, Inf. Soc..
[31] T. Bonoma. Case Research in Marketing: Opportunities, Problems, and a Process , 1985 .
[32] C. Bruce Kavan,et al. The adoption of inter-organizational systems: the example of electronic data interchange , 1992 .