Providing child safety equipment to prevent injuries: randomised controlled trial
Abstract:Objective To assess the effectiveness of safety advice and safety equipment in reducing unintentional injuries for families with children aged under 5 years and living in deprived areas. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting 47 general practices in Nottingham. Participants 3428 families with children under 5. Intervention A standardised safety consultation and provision of free and fitted stair gates, fire guards, smoke alarms, cupboard locks, and window locks. Main outcome measures Primary outcome measures were whether a child in the family had at least one injury that required medical attendance and rates of attendance in primary and secondary care and of hospital admission for injury over a two year period. Secondary outcome measures included possession of safety equipment and safety practices. Results No significant difference was found in the proportion of families in which a child had a medically attended injury (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.50) or in the rates of attendance in secondary care (incidence rate ratio 1.02, 0.90 to 1.13) or admission to hospital (1.02, 0.70 to 1.48). However, children in the intervention arm had a significantly higher attendance rate for injuries in primary care (1.37, 1.11 to 1.70, P = 0.003). At both one and two years' follow up, families in the intervention arm were significantly more likely to have a range of safety practices, but absolute differences in the percentages were relatively small. Conclusions The intervention resulted in significant improvements in safety practices for up to two years but did not reduce injuries that necessitated medical attendance. Although equipment was provided and fitted free of charge, the observed changes in safety practices may not have been large enough to affect injury rates.
暂无分享,去 创建一个
[1] D. Kendrick,et al. Measuring contamination in an injury prevention randomized controlled trial , 2005, International journal of injury control and safety promotion.
[2] D. Kendrick,et al. Validation of a home safety questionnaire used in a randomised controlled trial , 2003, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.
[3] H. Ward. Preventing accidental injury - priorities for action , 2002 .
[4] D. Kendrick,et al. Does sending a home safety questionnaire increase recruitment to an injury prevention trial? A randomised controlled trial , 2001, Journal of epidemiology and community health.
[5] I B Pless,et al. The effectiveness of a home visit to prevent childhood injury. , 2001, Pediatrics.
[6] Elizabeth M. L. Towner,et al. What works in preventing unintentional injuries in children and young adolescents? An updated systematic review , 2001 .
[7] S. Mallonee,et al. Evaluating injury prevention programs: the Oklahoma City Smoke Alarm Project. , 2002, The Future of children.
[8] J Hedlund,et al. Risky business: safety regulations, risk compensation, and individual behavior , 2000, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.
[9] J. Higgins,et al. Systematic review of controlled trials of interventions to promote smoke alarms , 2000, Archives of disease in childhood.
[10] I. Roberts,et al. Individual-level injury prevention strategies in the clinical setting. , 2000, The Future of children.
[11] Smoke alarm installation and function in inner London council housing , 1999, Archives of disease in childhood.
[12] P Marsh,et al. Preventing injuries in children: cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care , 1999, BMJ.
[13] J. Elkington,et al. Head injuries in infants: A closer look at baby-walkers, stairs and nursery furniture , 1999 .
[14] D. Kendrick,et al. A randomised controlled trial of general practitioner safety advice for families with children under 5 years , 1998, BMJ.
[15] D. Trichopoulos,et al. Risk factors for childhood burn injuries: a case-control study from Greece. , 1998, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.
[16] P D Mullen,et al. A meta-analysis of trials evaluating patient education and counseling for three groups of preventive health behaviors. , 1997, Patient education and counseling.
[17] D. Hunninghake,et al. Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography. , 1997, Controlled clinical trials.
[18] R. Lancashire,et al. General practitioners' attitudes to child injury prevention in the UK: a national postal questionnaire. , 1995, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.
[19] D. Kendrick. Role of the primary health care team in preventing accidents to children. , 1994, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
[20] Azizi Bh,et al. Circumstances surrounding accidental poisoning in children. , 1994 .
[21] B. Azizi,et al. Circumstances surrounding accidental poisoning in children. , 1994, The Medical journal of Malaysia.
[22] A. Woolf,et al. Poisoning prevention knowledge and practices of parents after a childhood poisoning incident. , 1992, Pediatrics.
[23] L. Bouter,et al. Determinants of behavioural risk factors for burn injuries. , 1991, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.
[24] S. Jarvis,et al. Measuring severity of injuries to children from home accidents. , 1989, Archives of disease in childhood.
[25] D. Black. HEALTH AND DEPRIVATION: Inequality and the north , 1988 .
[26] P D Mullen,et al. Clinical trials of patient education for chronic conditions: a comparative meta-analysis of intervention types. , 1985, Preventive medicine.