Visual cognition
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jeremy M Wolfe,et al. Visual Attention , 2020, Computational Models for Cognitive Vision.
[2] K. Nakayama,et al. Situating visual search , 2011, Vision Research.
[3] Michael J. Morgan,et al. Features and the ‘primal sketch’ , 2011, Vision Research.
[4] Frederick A.A. Kingdom,et al. Lightness, brightness and transparency: A quarter century of new ideas, captivating demonstrations and unrelenting controversy , 2011, Vision Research.
[5] W. Geisler,et al. Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research , 2011, Vision Research.
[6] David Whitney,et al. Spatial Resolution of Conscious Visual Perception in Infants , 2010, Psychological science.
[7] P. Cavanagh,et al. Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[8] J. Bishop,et al. Things and Places : How the Mind Connects with the World , 2010 .
[9] A. Schlottmann,et al. Goal attribution to schematic animals: do 6-month-olds perceive biological motion as animate? , 2010, Developmental science.
[10] F. Simion,et al. Newborns' Mooney-Face Perception. , 2009, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.
[11] G. Alvarez,et al. Number estimation relies on a set of segmented objects , 2009, Cognition.
[12] Richard L Gregory,et al. Seeing Through Illusions , 2009 .
[13] Doris Y. Tsao,et al. A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.
[14] John M. Findlay,et al. Representations of Vision: Trends and Tacit Assumptions in Vision Research , 2009 .
[15] A. Holcombe. Seeing slow and seeing fast: two limits on perception , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[16] Philip L. Smith,et al. An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection. , 2009, Psychological review.
[17] A. Adler,et al. Configural Processing , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.
[18] B. Baune,et al. Exploring Visual–Spatial Working Memory: A Critical Review of Concepts and Models , 2009, Neuropsychology Review.
[19] M. Goodale,et al. Two visual systems re-viewed , 2008, Neuropsychologia.
[20] Doris Y. Tsao,et al. Mechanisms of face perception. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.
[21] G. Alvarez,et al. Spatial separation between targets constrains maintenance of attention on multiple objects , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[22] John R. Anderson,et al. A central circuit of the mind , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[23] C. Koch,et al. Sparse but not ‘Grandmother-cell’ coding in the medial temporal lobe , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[24] Michael E Young,et al. The impact of object animacy on the appraisal of causality. , 2008, The American journal of psychology.
[25] Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al. The prefrontal cortex and the executive control of attention , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.
[26] F. Qiu,et al. Figure-ground mechanisms provide structure for selective attention , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.
[27] George A Alvarez,et al. How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. , 2007, Journal of vision.
[28] Patrick Cavanagh,et al. Quadrantic deficit reveals anatomical constraints on selection , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[29] Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al. Event perception: a mind-brain perspective. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.
[30] J. F. Kalaska,et al. Attention in hierarchical models of object recognition , 2007 .
[31] S. Kosslyn. You can play 20 questions with nature and win: Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations as a case study , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[32] A. Nobre,et al. Cognitive control of attention in the human brain: Insights from orienting attention to mental representations , 2006, Brain Research.
[33] M. D. Rutherford,et al. The Perception of Animacy in Young Children with Autism , 2006, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.
[34] L. Feigenson,et al. Multiple Spatially Overlapping Sets Can Be Enumerated in Parallel , 2006, Psychological science.
[35] David Melcher,et al. Subthreshold features of visual objects: Unseen but not unbound , 2006, Vision Research.
[36] John H. R. Maunsell,et al. Feature-based attention in visual cortex , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.
[37] S. Funahashi. Prefrontal cortex and working memory processes , 2006, Neuroscience.
[38] E. Vogel,et al. Interactions between attention and working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.
[39] Katherine M. Armstrong,et al. Visual and oculomotor selection: links, causes and implications for spatial attention , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[40] F. van der Velde,et al. Neural blackboard architectures of combinatorial structures in cognition , 2006, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[41] Antonio Torralba,et al. Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition. , 2006, Progress in brain research.
[42] Patrick Cavanagh,et al. Perceiving Illumination Inconsistencies in Scenes , 2005, Perception.
[43] P. Cavanagh,et al. Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields , 2005, Psychological science.
[44] F. Qiu,et al. Figure and Ground in the Visual Cortex: V2 Combines Stereoscopic Cues with Gestalt Rules , 2005, Neuron.
[45] Jean-François Delvenne,et al. The capacity of visual short-term memory within and between hemifields , 2005, Cognition.
[46] E. Rolls,et al. Attention, short-term memory, and action selection: A unifying theory , 2005, Progress in Neurobiology.
[47] P. Cavanagh,et al. Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[48] D. Melcher,et al. Implicit Attentional Selection of Bound Visual Features , 2005, Neuron.
[49] P. Roelfsema. Elemental operations in vision , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[50] B. Scholl,et al. The relationship between object files and conscious perception , 2005, Cognition.
[51] P. Cavanagh. The artist as neuroscientist , 2005, Nature.
[52] N. Block. Two neural correlates of consciousness , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[53] N. Lavie. Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[54] James R Müller,et al. Microstimulation of the superior colliculus focuses attention without moving the eyes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[55] Austen Clark,et al. Feature-placing and proto-objects , 2004 .
[56] Patrick Cavanagh,et al. The Influence of Cast Shadows on Visual Search , 2004, Perception.
[57] Z. Pylyshyn. Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities , 2004 .
[58] John R Anderson,et al. An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.
[59] James T. Enns. The Thinking Eye, the Seeing Brain: Explorations in Visual Cognition , 2004 .
[60] M. Bar. Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[61] J. Hyönä,et al. Is multiple object tracking carried out automatically by an early vision mechanism independent of higher‐order cognition? An individual difference approach , 2004 .
[62] J. Wolfe,et al. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[63] I. Gauthier,et al. Visual object understanding , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[64] James H. Elder,et al. Are Edges Incomplete? , 1999, International Journal of Computer Vision.
[65] Jitendra Malik,et al. Interpreting line drawings of curved objects , 1986, International Journal of Computer Vision.
[66] Kunihiko Fukushima,et al. Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position , 1980, Biological Cybernetics.
[67] C. Koch,et al. Visual Search and Dual Tasks Reveal Two Distinct Attentional Resources , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[68] Patrick Cavanagh,et al. Attention Routines and the Architecture of Selection , 2004 .
[69] David Mumford,et al. On the computational architecture of the neocortex , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.
[70] Katherine M. Armstrong,et al. Visuomotor Origins of Covert Spatial Attention , 2003, Neuron.
[71] Bahador Bahrami,et al. Object property encoding and change blindness in multiple object tracking , 2003 .
[72] B. Scholl,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article ATTENTIVE TRACKING OF OBJECTS VERSUS SUBSTANCES , 2022 .
[73] S. Treue. Visual attention: the where, what, how and why of saliency , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[74] Jacob Feldman,et al. Detection of change in shape: an advantage for concavities , 2003, Cognition.
[75] J. Feldman. What is a visual object? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[76] Z. Pylyshyn. Seeing and Visualizing: It's Not What You Think , 2003 .
[77] John K. Tsotsos,et al. The selective tuning model of attention: psychophysical evidence for a suppressive annulus around an attended item , 2003, Vision Research.
[78] Jun Saiki,et al. Feature binding in object-file representations of multiple moving items. , 2003, Journal of vision.
[79] K. Nakayama,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article CAUSAL CAPTURE: Contextual Effects on the Perception of Collision Events , 2022 .
[80] S. Hochstein,et al. View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.
[81] G. Boynton,et al. Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[82] B. Baars. The conscious access hypothesis: origins and recent evidence , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[83] P. Cavanagh,et al. The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.
[84] J. Decety,et al. From the perception of action to the understanding of intention , 2001, Nature reviews. Neuroscience.
[85] B. Scholl. Objects and attention: the state of the art , 2001, Cognition.
[86] Z. Pylyshyn. Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision , 2001, Cognition.
[87] P. Cavanagh,et al. Attention-based visual routines: sprites , 2001, Cognition.
[88] S. Dehaene,et al. Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework , 2001, Cognition.
[89] Steven Yantis,et al. Masking unveils pre-amodal completion representation in visual search , 2001, Nature.
[90] C. Koch,et al. Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[91] Refractor. Vision , 2000, The Lancet.
[92] Josh Weisberg,et al. Jerry Fodor, The Mind Doesn't Work That Way , 2001 .
[93] S Zeki,et al. Localization and globalization in conscious vision. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.
[94] Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al. Event structure in perception and conception. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.
[95] Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al. Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention , 2000, Vision Research.
[96] Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al. Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[97] J. R. Mounts. Evidence for suppressive mechanisms in attentional selection: Feature singletons produce inhibitory surrounds , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[98] A. Shimamura. Toward a Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition , 2000, Consciousness and Cognition.
[99] Ronald A. Rensink. The Dynamic Representation of Scenes , 2000 .
[100] J. Wolfe,et al. Postattentive vision. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[101] A. Gilchrist,et al. An anchoring theory of lightness perception. , 1999, Psychological review.
[102] P U Tse,et al. Complete mergeability and amodal completion. , 1999, Acta psychologica.
[103] Peter Ulric Tse,et al. Volume Completion , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.
[104] Z. Pylyshyn. Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. , 1999, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[105] S. Zeki,et al. Toward a Theory of Visual Consciousness , 1999, Consciousness and Cognition.
[106] Gordon D. Logan,et al. Please Scroll down for Article Visual Cognition Selection for Cognition: Cognitive Constraints on Visual Spatial Attention Selection for Cognition: Cognitive Constraints on Visual Spatial Attention , 2022 .
[107] Eileen Kowler,et al. Attentional interference at small spatial separations , 1999, Vision Research.
[108] J. Henderson,et al. High-level scene perception. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.
[109] David C. Burr,et al. Seeing biological motion , 1998, Nature.
[110] E. Hildreth,et al. Motion perception , 1998 .
[111] Pieter R. Roelfsema,et al. Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey , 1998, Nature.
[112] D. Knill,et al. The perception of cast shadows , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[113] Barry D. Vaughan,et al. Object-Based Visual Selection: Evidence From Perceptual Completion , 1998 .
[114] Donald D. Hoffman,et al. Visual Intelligence: How We Create What We See , 1998 .
[115] C. Koch,et al. Spatial vision thresholds in the near absence of attention , 1997, Vision Research.
[116] S. Grossberg. Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional figure-ground perception of two-dimensional pictures. , 1997, Psychological review.
[117] Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al. Embodiment is the foundation, not a level , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[118] Tomaso Poggio,et al. Role of learning in three-dimensional form perception , 1996, Nature.
[119] I. Howard. Alhazen's Neglected Discoveries of Visual Phenomena , 1996, Perception.
[120] Sheba Heptulla Chatterjee,et al. Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[121] George Sperling,et al. Three Systems for Visual Motion Perception , 1996 .
[122] Pascal Mamassian,et al. Illusory motion from shadows , 1996, Nature.
[123] Patrick Cavanagh,et al. Attentional resolution and the locus of awareness , 1996 .
[124] P. Cavanagh,et al. FACIAL ORGANIZATION BLOCKS ACCESS TO LOW-LEVEL FEATURES: AN OBJECT INFERIORITY EFFECT , 1995 .
[125] L. Finkel,et al. Intermediate-Level Visual Representations and the Construction of Surface Perception , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[126] H H Bülthoff,et al. How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? , 1994, Cerebral cortex.
[127] Shinsuke Shimojo,et al. Visual surface representation: a critical link between lower-level and higher level vision , 1995 .
[128] N. Logothetis,et al. View-dependent object recognition by monkeys , 1994, Current Biology.
[129] William T. Freeman,et al. The generic viewpoint assumption in a framework for visual perception , 1994, Nature.
[130] T. Sanocki. Time course of object identification: evidence for a global-to-local contingency. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[131] Stephen Grossberg,et al. A solution of the figure-ground problem for biological vision , 1993, Neural Networks.
[132] S. Dehaene. Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.
[133] Zijiang J. He,et al. Surfaces versus features in visual search , 1992, Nature.
[134] P Cavanagh,et al. Attention-based motion perception. , 1992, Science.
[135] K Nakayama,et al. Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. , 1992, Science.
[136] J. O'Regan,et al. Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.
[137] G. Saliba,et al. The Optics of Ibn Al-Haytham: Books I-III, on Direct Vision , 1992 .
[138] D. Kahneman,et al. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.
[139] D Mumford,et al. On the computational architecture of the neocortex. II. The role of cortico-cortical loops. , 1992, Biological cybernetics.
[140] S Ullman,et al. Visual curve tracing properties. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[141] Richard Reviewer-Granger. Unified Theories of Cognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[142] T. Tuulmets,et al. Occupancy model of perceived numerosity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.
[143] P. Kellman,et al. A theory of visual interpolation in object perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[144] Patrick Cavanagh,et al. What's up in top-down processing? , 1991 .
[145] M. Turk,et al. Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[146] I. Rock,et al. The legacy of Gestalt psychology. , 1990, Scientific American.
[147] S. Kosslyn,et al. Components of high-level vision: A cognitive neuroscience analysis and accounts of neurological syndromes , 1990, Cognition.
[148] T. Poggio,et al. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.
[149] Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al. Principles of Object Perception , 1990, Cogn. Sci..
[150] Z. Pylyshyn. The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model , 1989, Cognition.
[151] K Nakayama,et al. Stereoscopic Depth: Its Relation to Image Segmentation, Grouping, and the Recognition of Occluded Objects , 1989, Perception.
[152] A. Treisman. Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[153] Roger C. Schank,et al. SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .
[154] B. Baars. A cognitive theory of consciousness , 1988 .
[155] O. G. Selfridge,et al. Pandemonium: a paradigm for learning , 1988 .
[156] Z W Pylyshyn,et al. Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.
[157] V. Ramachandran,et al. Visual inertia in apparent motion , 1987, Vision Research.
[158] G. Rizzolatti,et al. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.
[159] A. Pentland. Recognition by Parts , 1987 .
[160] I. Rock,et al. A case of viewer-centered object perception , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.
[161] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[162] S. Ullman,et al. Curve tracing: A possible basic operation in the perception of spatial relations , 1986, Memory & cognition.
[163] M. Lévesque. Perception , 1986, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.
[164] Donald D. Hoffman,et al. Codon constraints on closed 2D shapes , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..
[165] S. Grossberg,et al. Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. , 1985, Psychological review.
[166] S. Ullman. Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.
[167] S. Pinker,et al. Visual cognition : An introduction * , 1989 .
[168] J. Stewart. PERCEPTION OF ANIMACY , 1982 .
[169] Leslie G. Ungerleider. Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .
[170] Harry G. Barrow,et al. Interpreting Line Drawings as Three-Dimensional Surfaces , 1980, Artif. Intell..
[171] O J Braddick,et al. Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[172] S. Anstis. The perception of apparent movement. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[173] M. Posner,et al. Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[174] Patrick Henry Winston,et al. The psychology of computer vision , 1976, Pattern Recognit..
[175] Marvin Minsky,et al. A framework for representing knowledge" in the psychology of computer vision , 1975 .
[176] O. Braddick. A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.
[177] Marvin Minsky,et al. A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .
[178] G. Johansson. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .
[179] R. Gregory,et al. Cognitive Contours , 1972, Nature.
[180] Jaakko Hintikka,et al. On the Logic of Perception , 1969 .
[181] Azriel Rosenfeld,et al. Picture Processing by Computer , 1969, CSUR.
[182] Hermann von Helmholtz,et al. Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1962 .
[183] Vision Research , 1961, Nature.
[184] F. Heider,et al. An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .
[185] F. Bartlett,et al. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .
[186] C. L. M.. The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.