Multivariate pattern analysis of MEG and EEG: a comparison of representational structure in time and space
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Paul E. Hamburger,et al. On an automated method , 1966, ACM '66.
[2] A. Fokas,et al. Electro–magneto-encephalography for a three-shell model: distributed current in arbitrary, spherical and ellipsoidal geometries , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[3] John W Belliveau,et al. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy , 2002, Human brain mapping.
[4] Dimitrios Pantazis,et al. Dynamics of scene representations in the human brain revealed by magnetoencephalography and deep neural networks , 2015, NeuroImage.
[5] Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al. The evolving representation of objects in the human brain. , 2012 .
[6] Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al. Visual representations are dominated by intrinsic fluctuations correlated between areas , 2015, NeuroImage.
[7] L. Garnero,et al. Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[8] Antonio Torralba,et al. Comparison of deep neural networks to spatio-temporal cortical dynamics of human visual object recognition reveals hierarchical correspondence , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[9] M. E. Spencer,et al. A Study of Dipole Localization Accuracy for MEG and EEG using a Human Skull Phantom , 1998, NeuroImage.
[10] Alexander Borst,et al. How does Nature Program Neuron Types? , 2008, Front. Neurosci..
[11] S. Taulu,et al. Suppression of Interference and Artifacts by the Signal Space Separation Method , 2003, Brain Topography.
[12] Zeb Kurth-Nelson,et al. Fast Sequences of Non-spatial State Representations in Humans , 2016, Neuron.
[13] Richard M. Leahy,et al. Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..
[14] Gunnar Rätsch,et al. An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms , 2001, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.
[15] Radoslaw Martin Cichy,et al. Resolving human object recognition in space and time , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.
[16] H Hosaka,et al. Part II: magnetic field produced by a current dipole. , 1976, Journal of electrocardiology.
[17] Dimitrios Pantazis,et al. Similarity-based fusion of MEG and fMRI reveals spatio-temporal dynamics in human cortex during visual object recognition , 2015 .
[18] Richard M. Leahy,et al. A comparison of random field theory and permutation methods for the statistical analysis of MEG data , 2005, NeuroImage.
[19] Keiji Tanaka,et al. Object category structure in response patterns of neuronal population in monkey inferior temporal cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.
[20] Sennay Ghebreab,et al. From Image Statistics to Scene Gist: Evoked Neural Activity Reveals Transition from Low-Level Natural Image Structure to Scene Category , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[21] Joel Z. Leibo,et al. The dynamics of invariant object recognition in the human visual system. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.
[22] S. Yantis,et al. Cortical mechanisms of feature-based attentional control. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.
[23] Roger B. H. Tootell,et al. The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: Comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex , 2007, NeuroImage.
[24] A. Norcia,et al. A Representational Similarity Analysis of the Dynamics of Object Processing Using Single-Trial EEG Classification , 2015, PloS one.
[25] Paul J. Laurienti,et al. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.
[26] Frank Tong,et al. Representational Dynamics of Facial Viewpoint Encoding , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[27] Keiji Tanaka,et al. Matching Categorical Object Representations in Inferior Temporal Cortex of Man and Monkey , 2008, Neuron.
[28] Omar H. Butt,et al. The Retinotopic Organization of Striate Cortex Is Well Predicted by Surface Topology , 2012, Current Biology.
[29] M Wagner,et al. Improving source reconstructions by combining bioelectric and biomagnetic data. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[30] David D. Cox,et al. Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.11 No.8 Untangling invariant object recognition , 2022 .
[31] N. Kriegeskorte,et al. Author ' s personal copy Representational geometry : integrating cognition , computation , and the brain , 2013 .
[32] D. Cohen,et al. Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[33] D. Cohen,et al. Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[34] R. Oostenveld,et al. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[35] S. Dehaene,et al. Time-Resolved Decoding of Two Processing Chains during Dual-Task Interference , 2015, Neuron.
[36] Karl J. Friston,et al. MEG and EEG data fusion: Simultaneous localisation of face-evoked responses , 2009, NeuroImage.
[37] Robert Oostenveld,et al. FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..
[38] R. Henson,et al. Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.
[39] P. Rossini,et al. Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: A simulation study with variable signal‐to‐noise ratio and number of sensors , 2004, Human brain mapping.
[40] Chih-Jen Lin,et al. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.
[41] Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .
[42] Seppo P. Ahlfors,et al. Superadditive Information from Simultaneous MEG/EEG Data , 2000 .
[43] Dimitrios Pantazis,et al. Similarity-Based Fusion of MEG and fMRI Reveals Spatio-Temporal Dynamics in Human Cortex During Visual Object Recognition , 2015, bioRxiv.
[44] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources , 2007, NeuroImage.
[45] S. Taulu,et al. Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.
[46] S. Dehaene,et al. Characterizing the dynamics of mental representations: the temporal generalization method , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[47] L. Tyler,et al. Predicting the Time Course of Individual Objects with MEG , 2014, Cerebral cortex.
[48] Thomas E. Nichols,et al. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.
[49] M. S. Hämäläinen,et al. Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum ℓ2-norm estimation , 2008, NeuroImage.
[50] Tomoyuki Nakahori,et al. Benefit of Simultaneous Recording of EEG and MEG in Dipole Localization , 2002, Epilepsia.
[51] R. Ilmoniemi,et al. Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .
[52] Tandra Ghose,et al. Generalization between canonical and non-canonical views in object recognition. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[53] David A. Tovar,et al. Representational dynamics of object vision: the first 1000 ms. , 2013, Journal of vision.