Helping students make controlled experiments more informative

We examine how encouraging students to compare rather than isolate variables affects their experimentation strategies and insights. We designed a week-long, technology-enhanced inquiry module on car collisions that logs students' interactions with a visualization. Physics students (N=166) were assigned to conditions that prompted them either to isolate or compare variables. Students responded to pretests, posttests, and embedded prompts that assessed students' understanding of motion graphs and collisions. Both groups made significant pretest to posttest gains. Students in the compare treatment used more diverse experimentation strategies than students in the isolate treatment. Compare students made nuanced interpretations of collision events based on threshold values. Case studies illustrate how comparing rather than isolating helped students use wide-ranging strategies to reach complex insights. The findings illustrate the value of encouraging multiple approaches to experimentation and connecting experimentation to real-life contexts.

[1]  D. Klahr,et al.  Heuristics for Scientific Experimentation: A Developmental Study , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Impacts of students' experimentation using a dynamic visualization on their understanding of motion , 2008, ICLS.

[3]  R. Millar,et al.  Reasoning from data: How students collect and interpret data in science investigations , 2004 .

[4]  Barbara C. Buckley,et al.  Using Log Files to Track Students' Model-based Inquiry in Science , 2006, ICLS.

[5]  L. Schauble,et al.  The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts. , 1996 .

[6]  L. Schauble,et al.  Students' transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation , 1991 .

[7]  B. Koslowski Theory and Evidence: The Development of Scientific Reasoning , 1996 .

[8]  Jennifer L. Chiu,et al.  Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science , 2006, Science.

[9]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  A time for telling , 1998 .

[10]  R. Siegler,et al.  Acquisition of formal scientific reasoning by 10- and 13-year-olds: Designing a factorial experiment. , 1975 .

[11]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Growth Of Logical Thinking From Childhood To Adolescence: An Essay On The Construction Of Formal Operational Structures , 1958 .

[12]  J. E. Tschirgi,et al.  Sensible reasoning: A hypothesis about hypotheses. , 1980 .

[13]  John J. Clement,et al.  Using Bridging Analogies and Anchoring Institutions to Seal with Students' Preconceptions in Physics , 1993 .