Phonetic accommodation of tone: Reversing a tone merger-in-progress via imitation

Abstract Previous literature has documented phonetic accommodation for various segmental and suprasegmental features, but the accommodation of tone remains under-explored. The current study contributes to the literature by investigating the accommodation of two merging tones in Hong Kong Cantonese, mid-level Tone 3 (T3) and low-level Tone 6 (T6), in a speech shadowing experiment. Specifically, we ask whether shadowers will reverse the merging trend after exposure to a model talker with distinct T3–T6 productions and if so, what factors will modulate the accommodative behaviors. Evidence for phonetic imitation is observed, but the effect varies by shadower’s baseline production of T3–T6 distinction and across different model talkers. Shadowers with less baseline tonal distinction exhibit greater degrees of imitation, suggesting that greater linguistic distance facilitates imitation. More robust imitation is observed in the young model talker condition, but the effect is most likely driven by the talker’s idiosyncratic production. Shadowers’ impression of the model talker and attitudes towards ongoing changes in the language did not show substantial impact on imitation. We discuss the implications of these findings for theories of speech perception and production.

[1]  Charles B. Chang,et al.  On the cognitive basis of contact-induced sound change: Vowel merger reversal in Shanghainese , 2016, Language.

[2]  P. Garrett Language attitudes and sociolinguistics , 2001 .

[3]  Jennifer Nycz,et al.  Second Dialect Acquisition: Implications for Theories of Phonological Representation , 2011 .

[4]  Roxana S. Y. Fung,et al.  Acoustic Analysis of the New Rising Tone in Hong Kong Cantonese , 2011, ICPhS.

[5]  Charles B. Chang Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first-language speech production , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[6]  B. Dodd,et al.  Phonological development: a normative study of British English‐speaking children , 2003, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[7]  L. Nygaard,et al.  Gender Differences in Vocal Accommodation: , 2002 .

[8]  Alan C. L. Yu,et al.  The Phonetics of Sound Change , 2020 .

[9]  Geoffrey T. LaFlair,et al.  Statistics for Categorical, Nonparametric, and Distribution-Free Data , 2018 .

[10]  M. Pickering,et al.  Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Amandine Michelas,et al.  Uncovering the Effect of Imitation on Tonal Patterns of French Accentual Phrases , 2011, INTERSPEECH.

[12]  C. Fowler,et al.  Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English , 1997 .

[13]  Andrew C. Billings,et al.  Assessing Language Attitudes: Speaker Evaluation Studies , 2008 .

[14]  Edward Flemming Contrast and Perceptual Distinctiveness , 2003 .

[15]  Jeff Siegel,et al.  Second Dialect Acquisition , 2010 .

[16]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition , 2007 .

[17]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Word-specific phonetics , 2001 .

[18]  Visual influences on alignment to voice onset time. , 2010, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[19]  Molly Babel,et al.  Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation? , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[20]  C. Fowler,et al.  Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. , 2003, Journal of memory and language.

[21]  M. Pickering,et al.  An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[22]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[23]  R. Meijer,et al.  A trial studying approach to predict college achievement , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[24]  A. Yu,et al.  Phonetic Imitation from an Individual-Difference Perspective: Subjective Attitude, Personality and “Autistic” Traits , 2013, PloS one.

[25]  J. German Dialect adaptation and two dimensions of tune , 2012 .

[26]  Molly Babel Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English , 2010, Language in Society.

[27]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Infant vocalizations in response to speech: vocal imitation and developmental change. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  P. Eckert Language And Adolescent Peer Groups , 2003 .

[29]  Ke Tao,et al.  A comparative study on polyp classification using convolutional neural networks , 2020, PloS one.

[30]  E. Zee Chinese (Hong Kong Cantonese) , 1991, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[31]  K. Shockley,et al.  Imitation in shadowing words , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Robert S. Bauer,et al.  Variation and merger of the rising tones in Hong Kong Cantonese , 2003, Language Variation and Change.

[33]  Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al.  Phonetic and phonological imitation of intonation in two varieties of Italian , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[34]  P. Trudgill Dialects in contact , 1986 .

[35]  P. Mok,et al.  Production and perception of a sound change in progress: Tone merging in Hong Kong Cantonese , 2013, Language Variation and Change.

[36]  Abby Walker,et al.  Repeat what after whom? Exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[37]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  Phonetic convergence across multiple measures and model talkers , 2016, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[38]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  Phonetic convergence in college roommates , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[39]  James Emil Flege,et al.  Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: a review , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[40]  I. R. MacKay,et al.  Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  R. Hopper,et al.  Measuring Language Attitudes: The Speech Evaluation Instrument , 1985 .

[42]  M. Pickering,et al.  Prediction and imitation in speech , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[43]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[44]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  Shadowing latency and imitation: the effect of familiarity with the phonetic patterning of English , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[45]  Matthew G. Wisniewski,et al.  Transfer Effects in the Vocal Imitation of Speech and Song , 2013 .

[46]  Howard GCiles ACCENT MOBILITY: A MODEL AND SOME DATA , 2016 .

[47]  K. Drager Speaker Age and Vowel Perception , 2011, Language and speech.

[48]  Molly Babel,et al.  Novelty and social preference in phonetic accommodation , 2014 .

[49]  E. Postma,et al.  Auditory perception bias in speech imitation , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[50]  Annie J. Olmstead,et al.  Comparison of native and non-native phone imitation by English and Spanish speakers , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[51]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Converging toward a common speech code: imitative and perceptuo-motor recalibration processes in speech production , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[52]  Molly Babel,et al.  The Role of Fundamental Frequency in Phonetic Accommodation , 2012, Language and speech.

[53]  Jiseung Kim Prosodic accommodation in Seoul Korean accentual phrases , 2016 .

[54]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[55]  Noël Nguyen,et al.  Speaking to a common tune: Between-speaker convergence in voice fundamental frequency in a joint speech production task , 2020, PloS one.

[56]  Molly Babel,et al.  Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[57]  J. Hay,et al.  Congruence between ‘word age’ and ‘voice age’ facilitates lexical access , 2011 .

[58]  C. To,et al.  Phonetic variations and sound changes in Hong Kong Cantonese: Diachronic review, synchronic study and implications for speech sound assessment , 2015, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[59]  Scott A. Jackson,et al.  High functional load inhibits phonological contrast loss: A corpus study , 2013, Cognition.

[60]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[61]  Paul Miok Raffaella Portner,et al.  The speaker-addressee relation at the syntax-semantics interface , 2019, Language.

[62]  Stephen D. Short,et al.  A Methodological Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Sexuality Research: Used Practices, Best Practices, and Data Analysis Resources , 2017, Journal of sex research.

[63]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[64]  James T. Mantell,et al.  Vocal imitation of song and speech , 2013, Cognition.

[65]  A variationist approach to tone categorization in Cantonese , 2019, Chinese Language and Discourse.

[66]  Gang Peng TEMPORAL AND TONAL ASPECTS OF CHINESE SYLLABLES: A CORPUS-BASED COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MANDARIN AND CANTONESE , 2005 .

[67]  W. Labov,et al.  Near-mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrast , 1991, Language Variation and Change.

[68]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[69]  A. Yu Understanding near mergers: the case of morphological tone in Cantonese* , 2007, Phonology.

[70]  Laurent Lamalle,et al.  Neural correlates of phonetic convergence and speech imitation , 2011, Front. Psychol..

[71]  Robert S. Bauer,et al.  Modern Cantonese Phonology , 1997 .

[72]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Phonological Representation: Beyond Abstract Versus Episodic , 2016 .

[73]  Lauren Hall-Lew,et al.  Improved representation of variance in measures of vowel merger , 2010 .

[74]  C. En A SYSTEM OF "TONE-LETTERS" , 1980 .

[75]  Ann R Bradlow,et al.  Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance. , 2011, Laboratory phonology.

[76]  J. Flege Second Language Speech Learning Theory , Findings , and Problems , 2006 .

[77]  J. V. van Berkum,et al.  How robust is the language architecture? The case of mood , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[78]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast , 1972 .

[79]  Meghan Clayards,et al.  Individual differences in the link between perception and production and the mechanisms of phonetic imitation , 2019, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience.

[80]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[81]  Kuniko Y. Nielsen Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation , 2011, J. Phonetics.

[82]  C. Fowler An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct realist perspective , 1986 .

[83]  Yannick Joye,et al.  An exploratory study into the effects of extraordinary nature on emotions, mood, and prosociality , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[84]  K. Drager,et al.  Awareness, Salience, and Stereotypes in Exemplar-Based Models of Speech Production and Perception , 2016 .

[85]  Gillian Sankoff Language change across the lifespan: Three trajectory types , 2019, Language.

[86]  H. Mitterer,et al.  The link between speech perception and production is phonological and abstract: Evidence from the shadowing task , 2008, Cognition.

[87]  P. Garde Réflexions sur les différences phonétiques entre les langues slaves , 1961 .

[88]  A. B. Smit,et al.  The Iowa Articulation Norms Project and Its Nebraska Replication , 1990 .

[89]  Joost Zwarts,et al.  Spatial semantics: Modeling the meaning of prepositions , 2017, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[90]  S. Goldinger Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[91]  H. Giles,et al.  Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. , 1991 .

[92]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  Phonetic convergence in shadowed speech: The relation between acoustic and perceptual measures , 2013 .

[93]  J. Harrington,et al.  Monophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: an acoustic analysis of the Queen's Christmas broadcasts , 2000, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[94]  L. Menn The Emergence of Phonology: Development of articulatory, phonetic, and phonological capabilities , 2013 .

[95]  Evan Hugh Coles-Harris Perspectives on the motivations for phonetic convergence , 2017, Lang. Linguistics Compass.