of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance Interaction Between Object-Based Attention and Pertinence Values Shapes the Attentional Priority Map of a Multielement Display

Between Object-Based Attention and Pertinence Values Previous studies have shown that the perceptual organization of the visual scene constrains the deploy-ment of attention. Here we investigated how the organization of multiple elements into larger configu- rations alters their attentional weight, depending on the “pertinence” or behavioral importance of the elements’ features. We assessed object-based effects on distinct aspects of the attentional priority map: top-down control, reflecting the tendency to encode targets rather than distracters, and the spatial distribution of attention weights across the visual scene, reflecting the tendency to report elements belonging to the same rather than different objects. In 2 experiments participants had to report the letters in briefly presented displays containing 8 letters and digits, in which pairs of characters could be connected with a line. Quantitative estimates of top-down control were obtained using Bundesen’s Theory of Visual Attention (1990). The spatial distribution of attention weights was assessed using the “paired response index” (PRI), indicating responses for within-object pairs of letters. In Experiment 1, grouping along the task-relevant dimension (targets with targets and distracters with distracters) in- creased top-down control and enhanced the PRI; in contrast, task-irrelevant grouping (targets with distracters) did not affect performance. In Experiment 2, we disentangled the effect of target-target and distracter-distracter grouping: Pairwise grouping of distracters enhanced top-down control whereas pairwise grouping of targets changed the PRI. We conclude that object-based perceptual representations interact with pertinence values (of the elements’ features and location) in the computation of attention weights, thereby creating a widespread pattern of attentional facilitation across the visual scene.

[1]  E. Macaluso,et al.  fMRI correlates of object-based attentional facilitation vs. suppression of irrelevant stimuli, dependent on global grouping and endogenous cueing , 2013, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[2]  R. Ptak The Frontoparietal Attention Network of the Human Brain , 2012, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[3]  Zhe Chen Object-based attention: A tutorial review , 2012, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[4]  Claus Bundesen,et al.  Generalizing parametric models by introducing trial-by-trial parameter variability: The case of TVA , 2011 .

[5]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Space-, object-, and feature-based attention interact to organize visual scenes , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Claus Bundesen,et al.  Prompt but inefficient: nicotine differentially modulates discrete components of attention , 2011, Psychopharmacology.

[7]  Kevin Dent,et al.  Spreading suppression and the guidance of search by movement: Evidence from negative color carry-over effects , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Attention, intention, and priority in the parietal lobe. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  Kyle R Cave,et al.  Object-based attention with endogenous cuing and positional certainty , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Hyunkyu Lee,et al.  Attentional spreading in object-based attention. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  The space of an object: object attention alters the spatial gradient in the surround. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Ronald Peeters,et al.  Convergence between Lesion-Symptom Mapping and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Spatially Selective Attention in the Intact Brain , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Ruth Kimchi,et al.  Automatic, stimulus-driven attentional capture by objecthood , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  David Crundall,et al.  Object-based attention is mediated by collinearity of targets , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  J. Duncan EPS Mid-Career Award 2004: Brain mechanisms of attention , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  James M. Brown,et al.  Shifting attention into and out of objects: Evaluating the processes underlying the object advantage , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  C. Bundesen,et al.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. , 2005, Psychological review.

[18]  Alexandria C Marino,et al.  The role of closure in defining the "objects" of object-based attention. , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  S. Yantis,et al.  Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  Morris Goldsmith,et al.  Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  R. Abrams,et al.  Object-based selection within and beyond the focus of spatial attention , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking , 2001, Cognition.

[23]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[25]  Judith Avrahami,et al.  Objects of attention, objects of perception , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  R. Zemel,et al.  Object-Based Attention and Occlusion Evidence From Normal Participants and a Computational Model , 1998 .

[27]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[28]  M. Farah,et al.  Is visual image segmentation a bottom-up or an interactive process? , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  H. Neumann,et al.  Luminance and edge information in grouping: a study using visual search. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  David L. Elliott,et al.  Neural Systems for Control , 1997 .

[31]  N Lavie,et al.  On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  M. Farah,et al.  Does visual attention select objects or locations? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  I. Rock,et al.  Perceptual organization and attention , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  A. Kramer,et al.  Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[39]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[41]  C Bundesen,et al.  Visual selection from multielement displays: measuring and modeling effects of exposure duration. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  M. Posner,et al.  Neural systems control of spatial orienting. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[43]  S. Palmer,et al.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Object-based attention: Strength of object representation and attentional guidance , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  S. Kyllingsbaek,et al.  Modeling visual attention. , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[46]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: Evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  Sarah Shomstein,et al.  Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting? , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Object-based selection: The role of attentional shifts , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  S. E. Watson,et al.  Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[51]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: effects with single- and combined-feature targets. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[52]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[53]  L Harms,et al.  Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[54]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[55]  M. Wertheimer Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .