Tactile Diagrams: Worth Ten Thousand Words?

The properties that make diagrams more effective than text in certain circumstances have been investigated by researchers for over 20 years. However, this research has focused on visual diagrams. To the best of our knowledge, no research has yet investigated whether the same benefits and properties hold for tactile diagrams, which are blind people's primary means of access to diagrams. We present a consideration of similarities and differences in the properties and potential benefits of visual and tactile diagrams; and suggest where experimental investigation would be useful.

[1]  R. Klatzky,et al.  The Intelligent Hand , 1988 .

[2]  S. Lederman,et al.  Perception of texture by vision and touch: multidimensionality and intersensory integration. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  John A. Gardner,et al.  Scientific Diagrams Made Easy with IVEOTM , 2006, ICCHP.

[4]  Wolfgang L. Zagler,et al.  Computers Helping People with Special Needs, 12th International Conference, ICCHP 2010, Vienna, Austria, July 14-16, 2010, Proceedings, Part II , 2010, ICCHP.

[5]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987 .

[6]  Linda Sheppard,et al.  Tactile graphics: A beginner's guide to graphics for visually impaired children , 2000 .

[7]  F K Aldrich,et al.  Tangible Line Graphs: An Experimental Investigation of Three Formats Using Capsule Paper , 1987, Human factors.

[8]  Yorick Wilks,et al.  Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing , 2018 .

[9]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  External cognition: how do graphical representations work? , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  John A. Gardner,et al.  Scientific diagrams made easy with IVEO , 2006 .

[11]  Steven Landau,et al.  Development of a Talking Tactile Tablet , 2001 .

[12]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[13]  P. Pietrini,et al.  Imagery and spatial processes in blindness and visual impairment , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[14]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  External Representations Contribute to the Dynamic Construction of Ideas , 2002, Diagrams.

[15]  Yvonne Eriksson.  Tactile Pictures. Pictorial representations for the blind 1784-1940 , 1998 .

[16]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Haptic human-computer interaction , 2003, CHINZ '03.

[17]  Simon Ungar,et al.  Cognitive mapping without visual experience , 2018, Cognitive Mapping.

[18]  M. Hegarty.  Mental animation: inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  N. Goodman,et al.  Languages of art : an approach to a theory of symbols , 1979 .

[20]  Leanne Thompson,et al.  Beyond visual conventions: Rethinking the design of tactile diagrams , 2006 .

[21]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[22]  Neff Walker,et al.  A classification of visual representations , 1994, CACM.

[23]  Ben P. Challis,et al.  Design Principles for Tactile Interaction , 2000, Haptic Human-Computer Interaction.

[24]  J. Gibson.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[25]  Frances Aldrich.  Talk to the Hand: An Agenda for Further Research on Tactile Graphics , 2008, Diagrams.

[26]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1986 .

[27]  J. Barwise,et al.  Visual information and valid reasoning , 1991 .

[28]  S. Coren,et al.  In Sensation and perception , 1979 .

[29]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  A taxonomy of visualization techniques using the data state reference model , 2000, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2000. INFOVIS 2000. Proceedings.

[30]  P. Fayers,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1990 .

[31]  Jon Oberlander,et al.  A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: logic and implementation. Cognitive Science , 1995 .

[32]  Merideth Leigh Gattis,et al.  Spatial schemas and abstract thought , 2001 .

[33]  Aaron Sloman,et al.  Afterthoughts on Analogical Representations , 1975, TINLAP.

[34]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Reasoning about the referent of a picture versus reasoning about the picture as the referent: An effect of visual realism , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Atsushi Shimojima.  The Graphic-Linguistic DistinctionExploring Alternatives , 1999 .