The representation of contrast and other stimulus parameters by single neurons in area 17 of the cat

The responses of neurons in area 17 were tested as a function of various stimulus parameters. The thresholds of individual cortical neurons were at contrasts between 0.01 and 0.1 (increment of 0.5×10−1 cd/m−2 on a background of 3 cd/m−2), the dynamic ranges were 1.0–2.0 log units of increment, and all cells showed a response decrease at increments above a certain maximum (supersaturation response). The averaged contrast/response curve for all neurons was S-shaped in the logarithmic plot, had a dynamic range of 2.5 log units, reached its maximum at a contrast of 0.75 and supersaturated above this level. The contrast/ sensitivity curves changed their slope under different stimulus conditions. They became flatter when the non-dominant eye was stimuated as compared to dominant eye stimulation or when the stimulation was done at a non-optimal orientation or direction, and they became steeper when both eyes were stimulated. But the maximum was reached at the same contrast and supersaturation was seen above maximum contrast no matter whether a cell was stronlgy (e.g. binocular stimulation at optimal orientation) or weakly excited (non-dominant or non-optimal orientation stimulation). After normalization, the averaged population contrast/response curves were virtually identical at all stimulus conditions. It was concluded, that range as well as maximum and supersaturation of cortical contrast/response curves are determined before the input reaches the cortex, and that the cortical cells summate, essentially, linearly. The findings furthermore demonstrate that the supersaturation of the cortical input must be due to subtractive inhibition, and that the same is true for the orientation sensitive inhibition in the cortex itself. Both, the peripheral contrast and the cortical orientation dependant inhibition cannot be explained by multiplicative inhibition. The fact, that the responses of neurons depend on many variables relativates their significance for feature representation.

[1]  A. Sillito.  Inhibitory mechanisms influencing complex cell orientation selectivity and their modification at high resting discharge levels. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  K. Albus,et al.  Early post‐natal development of neuronal function in the kitten's visual cortex: a laminar analysis. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  L. Peachey,et al.  The distribution of the T‐system along the sarcomeres of frog and toad sartorius muscles , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  D. Hubel,et al.  Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  D. P. Andrews,et al.  Invariance of orientational and directional tuning in visual cortical cells of the adult cat , 1975, Brain Research.

[8]  M. R. Harter,et al.  Binocular summation of visually evoked responses to pattern stimuli in humans. , 1973, Vision research.

[9]  I. Donaldson,et al.  Variability of the relative preference for stimulus orientation and direction of movement in some units of the cat visual cortex (areas 17 and 18). , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  若山 曉美.  両眼視野における Binocular Summation の影響 , 2006 .

[11]  Bert Sakmann,et al.  Scotopic and mesopic light adaptation in the cat's retina , 1969, Pflügers Archiv.

[12]  A. Sillito,et al.  Inhibitory interactions contributing to the ocular dominance of monocularly dominated cells in the normal cat striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  O. Creutzfeldt,et al.  An intracellular analysis of visual cortical neurones to moving stimuli: Responses in a co-operative neuronal network , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Orientation specificity and response variability of cells in the striate cortex. , 1973, Vision research.

[15]  Trichur Raman Vidyasagar,et al.  Orientation sensitivity of cat LGN neurones with and without inputs from visual cortical areas 17 and 18 , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  U. Kuhnt,et al.  Decreased post-synaptic inhibition in the visual cortex during flicker stimulation. , 1971, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  O. D. Creutzfeldt,et al.  Representation of complex visual stimuli in the brain , 1978, Naturwissenschaften.

[18]  O. Creutzfeldt,et al.  Electrophysiology and Topographical Distribution of Visual Evoked Potentials in Animals , 1973 .

[19]  K I Naka,et al.  S‐potential and dark adaptation in fish , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Sensitivity distribution and spatial summation within receptive-field center of retinal on-center ganglion cells and transfer function of the retina. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  B. B. Lee,et al.  Linear signal transmission from prepotentials to cells in the macaque lateral geniculate nucleus , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  A. Dean.  The relationship between response amplitude and contrast for cat striate cortical neurones. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  D. Hubel,et al.  Anatomical demonstration of orientation columns in macaque monkey , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  R. B. Freeman,et al.  Binocular interaction in the visual cortex of awake cats , 1971, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  J. A. Movshon,et al.  The dependence of response amplitude and variance of cat visual cortical neurones on stimulus contrast , 1981, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  K. Albus.  A quantitative study of the projection area of the central and the paracentral visual field in area 17 of the cat , 1975, Experimental brain research.

[27]  B. B. Lee,et al.  Cell responses in dorsal layers of macaque lateral geniculate nucleus as a function of intensity and wavelength. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  B. B. Lee,et al.  Responses of cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus to moving stimuli at various levels of light and dark adaptation , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  U. Kuhnt.  Visuelle Reaktionspotentiale an Menschen und Katzen in Abhängigkeit von der Intensität , 1967, Pflüger's Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.

[30]  T. Tsumoto,et al.  Modification of orientation sensitivity of cat visual cortex neurons by removal of GABA-mediated inhibition , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  R. Freeman,et al.  Orientation selectivity in the cat's striate cortex is invariant with stimulus contrast , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  G. F. Cooper,et al.  The angular selectivity of visual cortical cells to moving gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  G. Fechner.  Über einige Verhältnisse des binocularen Sehens , 2022 .

[34]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field co‐ordinates and optics , 1962, The Journal of physiology.