Autonomous Vehicle Fleet Sizes Required to Serve Different Levels of Demand

Automated vehicles (AVs) promise many benefits for future mobility. One of them is a reduction of the required total vehicle fleet size, especially if AVs are used predominantly as shared vehicles. This paper presents research on this potential reduction for the greater Zurich, Switzerland, region. Fleets of shared AVs serving a predefined demand were simulated with a simulation framework introduced in the paper. Scenarios combining levels of demand for AVs with levels of supply (i.e., AV fleet sizes) were created. An important contribution of this study is the use of travel demand at highly detailed spatial and temporal resolutions that goes beyond the simplifications used in previous studies on the topic. This detailed travel demand provides a more solid basis for the ongoing discussion about the future fleet size. It was found that for a given fleet performance target (here, the target was for 95% of all transport requests to be served within 5 min), the relationship between served demand and required fleet size was nonlinear and the ratio increased as demand increased. A scale effect was detected. This effect has the important implication that for different levels of demand the fleet is used more or less efficiently. This study also found that if waiting times of up to 10 min were accepted, a reduction of up to 90% of the total vehicle fleet could be possible even without active fleet management, like vehicle redistribution. Such effects require, however, that a large enough share of the car demand be served by AVs.

[1]  Paolo Santi,et al.  Supporting Information for Quantifying the Benefits of Vehicle Pooling with Shareability Networks Data Set and Pre-processing , 2022 .

[2]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  The Multi-Agent Transport Simulation , 2016 .

[3]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers , 2014 .

[4]  Itf Urban Mobility System Upgrade: How shared self-driving cars could change city traffic , 2015 .

[5]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Carsharing Demand Estimation , 2015 .

[6]  Alain L. Kornhauser,et al.  The Revolutionary Development of Self-Driving Vehicles and Implications for the Transportation Engineering Profession , 2013 .

[7]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  The Travel and Environmental Implications of Shared Autonomous Vehicles, Using Agent-Based Model Scenarios , 2014 .

[8]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Toward a Systematic Approach to the Design and Evaluation of Automated Mobility-on-Demand Systems: A Case Study in Singapore , 2014 .

[9]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Using Survey Calibration and Statistical Matching to Reweight and Distribute Activity Schedules , 2014 .

[10]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Models, algorithms, and evaluation for autonomous mobility-on-demand systems , 2015, 2015 American Control Conference (ACC).

[11]  Alain L. Kornhauser,et al.  Uncongested Mobility for All: A Proposal for an Area Wide Autonomous Taxi System in New Jersey , 2014 .

[12]  Francesco Ciari,et al.  Enhancement of the carsharing fleet utilization , 2015 .

[13]  Simone Weikl,et al.  Relocation strategies and algorithms for free-floating Car Sharing Systems , 2013, 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[14]  Thibaut Dubernet,et al.  Implementing a household joint activity-travel multi- agent simulation tool: first results , 2015 .

[15]  Francesco Ciari,et al.  Agent-based simulation of autonomous cars , 2015, 2015 American Control Conference (ACC).