Study on dual peg-in-hole insertion using of constraints formed in the environment

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop a dual peg-in-hole insertion strategy. Dual peg-in-hole insertion is the most common task in manufacturing. Most of the previous work develop the insertion strategy in a two- or three-dimensional space, in which they suppose the initial yaw angle is zero and only concern the roll and pitch angles. However, in some case, the yaw angle could not be ignored due to the pose uncertainty of the peg on the gripper. Therefore, there is a need to design the insertion strategy in a higher-dimensional configuration space. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, the authors handle the insertion problem by converting it into several sub-problems based on the attractive region formed by the constraints. The existence of the attractive region in the high-dimensional configuration space is first discussed. Then, the construction of the high-dimensional attractive region with its sub-attractive region in the low-dimensional space is proposed. Therefore, the robotic insertion strategy can be designed in the subspace to eliminate some uncertainties between the dual pegs and dual holes. Findings Dual peg-in-hole insertion is realized without using of force sensors. The proposed strategy is also used to demonstrate the precision dual peg-in-hole insertion, where the clearance between the dual-peg and dual-hole is about 0.02 mm. Practical implications The sensor-less insertion strategy will not increase the cost of the assembly system and also can be used in the dual peg-in-hole insertion. Originality/value The theoretical and experimental analyses for dual peg-in-hole insertion are proposed without using of force sensor.

[1]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Automatic Synthesis of Fine-Motion Strategies for Robots , 1984 .

[2]  Hong Qiao,et al.  Combination of strategy investigation and utilization of sensor signals in robotic assembly , 2000 .

[3]  Michael A. Erdmann,et al.  Using Backprojections for Fine Motion Planning with Uncertainty , 1986 .

[4]  Matthew T. Mason,et al.  An exploration of sensorless manipulation , 1986, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[5]  井上 博允,et al.  Force Feedback in Precise Assembly Tasks , 1975 .

[6]  Mohsen Moradi Dalvand,et al.  A hybrid contact state analysis methodology for robotic-based adjustment of cylindrical pair , 2011 .

[7]  Richard A. Volz,et al.  Acquiring robust, force-based assembly skills from human demonstration , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[8]  Joris De Schutter,et al.  Polyhedral contact formation identification for autonomous compliant motion: exact nonlinear bayesian filtering , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[9]  Hong Qiao,et al.  The Concept of “Attractive Region in Environment” and its Application in High-Precision Tasks With Low-Precision Systems , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[10]  Wyatt S. Newman,et al.  Force-responsive robotic assembly of transmission components , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[11]  Paul Vanherck,et al.  Active force feedback in industrial robotic assembly: A case study , 1987 .

[12]  Yasuhisa Hasegawa,et al.  Insertion of long peg into tandem shallow hole using search trajectory generation without force feedback , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[13]  Robert H. Sturges,et al.  Jamming conditions for multiple peg-in-hole assemblies , 1997, Robotica.

[14]  Anders Robertsson,et al.  Force controlled robotic assembly without a force sensor , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Friedrich Lange,et al.  Classification and prediction for accurate sensor-based assembly to moving objects , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Shuguang Huang,et al.  Admittance selection for force-guided assembly of polygonal parts despite friction , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[17]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Quasi-Static Assembly of Compliantly Supported Rigid Parts , 1982 .

[18]  Matteo Parigi Polverini,et al.  Sensorless and constraint based peg-in-hole task execution with a dual-arm robot , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[19]  Devin J. Balkcom,et al.  A sensorless insertion strategy for rigid planar parts , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[20]  Jianjun Wang,et al.  High-precision assembly automation based on robot compliance , 2009 .

[21]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Robotic assembly of complex planar parts: An experimental evaluation , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[22]  Pudji Astuti,et al.  Discrete event controller synthesis for the convergence of an assembly process , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[23]  Yanqiong Fei,et al.  Jamming analyses for dual peg-in-hole insertions in three dimensions , 2005, Robotica.