Parametric induction of animacy experience

Graphical displays of simple moving geometrical figures have been repeatedly used to study the attribution of animacy in human observers. Yet little is known about the relevant movement characteristics responsible for this experience. The present study introduces a novel parametric research paradigm, which allows for the experimental control of specific motion parameters and a predictable influence on the attribution of animacy. Two experiments were conducted using 3D computer animations of one or two objects systematically introducing variations in the following aspects of motion: directionality, discontinuity and responsiveness. Both experiments further varied temporal kinematics. Results showed that animacy experience increased with the time a moving object paused in the vicinity of a second object and with increasing complexity of interaction between the objects (approach and responsiveness). The experience of animacy could be successfully modulated in a parametric fashion by the systematic variation of comparably simple differential movement characteristics.

[1]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  K. Hiraki,et al.  An event-related potentials study of biological motion perception in human infants. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[3]  U. Frith.  Emanuel Miller lecture: confusions and controversies about Asperger syndrome. , 2004, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[4]  G Johansson,et al.  Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception , 1976, Psychological research.

[5]  G. Csibra.  Goal attribution to inanimate agents by 6.5-month-old infants , 2008, Cognition.

[6]  S. Lea,et al.  Visual Perception of Intentional Motion , 1994, Perception.

[7]  C. Frith,et al.  Schizophrenia and theory of mind , 2004, Psychological Medicine.

[8]  C. Frith,et al.  Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.

[9]  A. Premack,et al.  Causal cognition : a multidisciplinary debate , 1996 .

[10]  Gordon Claridge,et al.  Schizotypy: Implications for Illness and Health , 2002 .

[11]  John E. Opfer,et al.  Identifying living and sentient kinds from dynamic information: the case of goal-directed versus aimless autonomous movement in conceptual change , 2002, Cognition.

[12]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Mentalising, schizotypy, and schizophrenia , 1999, Cognition.

[13]  Life is not just in the fast lane: dissociating the perceptions of speed and animacy , 2007 .

[14]  E. Gyulai,et al.  Considerations on Perception of “Animacy” in the Motion of a Single Object , 2004, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  R. Bentall,et al.  Persecutory delusions: a review and theoretical integration. , 2001, Clinical psychology review.

[16]  Z. Nadasdy,et al.  Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age , 1995, Cognition.

[17]  G. Csibra,et al.  Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy , 1999, Cognition.

[18]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[19]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[20]  J. Stewart.  PERCEPTION OF ANIMACY , 1982 .

[21]  Csaba Veres,et al.  The perceived intentionality of groups , 1999, Cognition.

[22]  B. Rimé,et al.  The perception of interpersonal emotions originated by patterns of movement , 1985 .

[23]  Uta Frith,et al.  Theory of mind , 2001, Current Biology.

[24]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Distinguishing Between Animates And Inanimates: Not By Motion Alone , 1995 .

[25]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[26]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  D. Premack,et al.  The perception of intention. , 1989, Science.

[28]  Pascal Boyer,et al.  How the brain perceives causality: an event-related fMRI study , 2001, Neuroreport.

[29]  J. N. Bassili.  Temporal and spatial contingencies in the perception of social events , 1976 .

[30]  J. Burns.  The social brain hypothesis of schizophrenia. , 2006, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.

[31]  A. Schlottmann,et al.  Do 9-Month-Olds Perceive Causation-at-a-Distance? , 1999, Perception.

[32]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Computer Animated Movement and Person Perception: Methodological Advances in Nonverbal Behavior Research , 2001 .

[34]  Raymond A Mar,et al.  Triggering the intentional stance. , 2007, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[35]  G. Csibra,et al.  Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naı̈ve theory of rational action , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  Stefanie Hoehl,et al.  The perception of biological motion by infants: An event-related potential study , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[37]  A. Leslie.  Spatiotemporal Continuity and the Perception of Causality in Infants , 1984, Perception.

[38]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Transcript-based computer animation of movement: Evaluating a new tool for nonverbal behavior research , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  PET Imaging and Cognition in Schizophrenia , 1992, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[40]  S. Gelman,et al.  Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity In Cognition And Culture , 1994 .

[41]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[42]  D. Premack.  The infant's theory of self-propelled objects , 1990, Cognition.

[43]  Ken Springer,et al.  Nonverbal bases of social perception: Developmental change in sensitivity to patterns of motion that reveal interpersonal events , 1996 .

[44]  Susan C. Johnson,et al.  Inferring the goals of a nonhuman agent , 2001 .

[45]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Eye contact detection in humans from birth , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Stephen J. Misovich,et al.  Effects of Disruption of Structure and Motion on Perceptions of Social Causality , 1992 .

[47]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Can a Self-Propelled Box Have a Goal? , 2005, Psychological science.

[48]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  A. Leslie.  Mapping the mind: ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity , 1994 .

[50]  Robin M. Murray,et al.  Cognitive neuropsychiatric models of persecutory delusions. , 2001, The American journal of psychiatry.

[51]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  D. Wegner,et al.  Dimensions of Mind Perception , 2007, Science.

[53]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  A Parametric Study of Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Human Working Memory , 1996, NeuroImage.

[54]  Maja J. Matarić,et al.  Human Simulation of Adaptive Behavior: Interactive studies of pursuit, evasion, courtship, fighting, and play , 1996 .

[55]  C. Boyatzis,et al.  Children's facial and gestural decoding and encoding: Relations between skills and with popularity , 1994 .

[56]  P. Rochat,et al.  Young infants' sensitivity to movement information specifying social causality , 1997 .

[57]  N. Emery,et al.  The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze , 2000, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[58]  U. Frith,et al.  Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development , 2000 .

[59]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ? , 1985, Cognition.

[60]  T. Brazelton,et al.  The infant's response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. , 1978, Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry.

[61]  David Premack,et al.  Intention as psychological cause , 1996 .

[62]  D. Rakison,et al.  Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[63]  P. Todd,et al.  Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: A cross-cultural study , 2005 .

[64]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[65]  Gary Bente,et al.  Person perception effects of computer-simulated male and female head movement , 1996 .

[66]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perception of Animacy from the Motion of a Single Object , 2000, Perception.

[67]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Activation in Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Parallels Parameter Inducing the Percept of Animacy , 2005, Neuron.

[68]  J. Bruner,et al.  The capacity for joint visual attention in the infant , 1975, Nature.