Trust in surveys and games - A methodological contribution on the influence of money and location

This paper explores methods to study trust. In a variety of settings, answers to survey questions and choices in a trust game are obtained from student sample pools. Some subjects are approached by mail and execute their task at home whereas others participate in classroom experiments. No differences between the results obtained by these methods are observed. Furthermore, one additional group plays the trust game with purely hypothetical payments, and another receives random lottery payments. This changes trust behavior dramatically, whereas trustworthiness is unaffected. Subjects without any financial incentives exhibit less trust and their trust choices are significantly correlated with survey trust answers. There is no such correlation for the corresponding choices with real payments.

[1]  James C. Cox,et al.  On the Nature of Reciprocal Motives , 2005 .

[2]  Peter Martinsson,et al.  Does stake size matter in trust games , 2005 .

[3]  Håkan J. Holm,et al.  Intra-Generational Trust - a Semi-Experimental Study of Trust Among Different Generations , 2005 .

[4]  V. Smith,et al.  Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games , 1994 .

[5]  Rachel Croson,et al.  The boundaries of trust: own and others' actions in the US and China , 2004 .

[6]  Robin P. Cubitt,et al.  On the Validity of the Random Lottery Incentive System , 1998 .

[7]  Colin Camerer,et al.  A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games , 2004 .

[8]  Ernan Haruvy,et al.  Social distance and reciprocity: An Internet experiment , 2007 .

[9]  H. Holm,et al.  Tropic Trust Versus Nordic Trust: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania and Sweden , 2005 .

[10]  R. Sugden,et al.  Does the Random-Lottery Incentive System Elicit True Preferences? An Experimental Investigation , 2016 .

[11]  Daniel Houser,et al.  A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  P. Zak,et al.  Trust and Growth , 2001 .

[13]  A. Rubinstein.  Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times , 2006 .

[14]  N. Jianakoplos,et al.  ARE WOMEN MORE RISK AVERSE , 1998 .

[15]  Stephen F. Knack,et al.  Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation , 1997 .

[16]  Charles Bellemare,et al.  On Representative Trust , 2003 .

[17]  R. Inglehart.  Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies , 1997 .

[18]  Martin Dufwenberg,et al.  Measuring Beliefs in an Experimental Lost Wallet Game , 2000, Games Econ. Behav..

[19]  V. Smith.  Behavioral economics research and the foundations of economics , 2005 .

[20]  Gary Charness,et al.  When Optimal Choices Feel Wrong: A Laboratory Study of Bayesian Updating, Complexity, and Affect , 2004 .

[21]  Colin Camerer,et al.  The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework , 1999 .

[22]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[23]  Werner Güth,et al.  Bargaining Outside the Lab a Newspaper Experiment of a Three-Person Ultimatum Game , 2005 .

[24]  Charles Bellemare,et al.  On Representative Social Capital , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics , 2005 .

[26]  Rudolf Müller,et al.  Design and evaluation of an economic experiment via the Internet , 2001 .

[27]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  A Nation-Wide Laboratory: Examining Trust and Trustworthiness by Integrating Behavioral Experiments into Representative Survey , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[28]  Kevin McCabe,et al.  Using the Machiavellianism Instrument to Predict Trustworthiness in a Bargaining Game , 2002 .

[29]  Tal Shavit,et al.  A comparative study of lotteries-evaluation in class and on the Web , 2001 .

[30]  K. Arrow.  Gifts and Exchanges , 1982 .

[31]  W. Güth,et al.  Fairness in the Mail and Opportunism in the Internet: A Newspaper Experiment on Ultimatum Bargaining , 2003 .

[32]  Christian Thöni,et al.  Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-economic background: survey and experimental evidence , 2004 .

[33]  Matthias Sutter,et al.  Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups , 2007, Games Econ. Behav..

[34]  Aldo Rustichini,et al.  Your morals might be your moods , 2006 .