Identification of abnormal tribological regimes using a microphone and semi-supervised machine-learning algorithm

Functional surfaces in relative contact and motion are prone to wear and tear, resulting in loss of efficiency and performance of the workpieces/machines. Wear occurs in the form of adhesion, abrasion, scuffing, galling, and scoring between contacts. However, the rate of the wear phenomenon depends primarily on the physical properties and the surrounding environment. Monitoring the integrity of surfaces by offline inspections leads to significant wasted machine time. A potential alternate option to offline inspection currently practiced in industries is the analysis of sensors signatures capable of capturing the wear state and correlating it with the wear phenomenon, followed by in situ classification using a state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) algorithm. Though this technique is better than offline inspection, it possesses inherent disadvantages for training the ML models. Ideally, supervised training of ML models requires the datasets considered for the classification to be of equal weightage to avoid biasing. The collection of such a dataset is very cumbersome and expensive in practice, as in real industrial applications, the malfunction period is minimal compared to normal operation. Furthermore, classification models would not classify new wear phenomena from the normal regime if they are unfamiliar. As a promising alternative, in this work, we propose a methodology able to differentiate the abnormal regimes, i.e., wear phenomenon regimes, from the normal regime. This is carried out by familiarizing the ML algorithms only with the distribution of the acoustic emission (AE) signals captured using a microphone related to the normal regime. As a result, the ML algorithms would be able to detect whether some overlaps exist with the learnt distributions when a new, unseen signal arrives. To achieve this goal, a generative convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture based on variational auto encoder (VAE) is built and trained. During the validation procedure of the proposed CNN architectures, we were capable of identifying acoustics signals corresponding to the normal and abnormal wear regime with an accuracy of 97% and 80%. Hence, our approach shows very promising results for in situ and real-time condition monitoring or even wear prediction in tribological applications.

[1]  P. Blau Interpretations of the friction and wear break-in behavior of metals in sliding contact , 1981 .

[2]  Nitin Ambhore,et al.  A Review on Tool Wear Monitoring System , 2016 .

[3]  A. Hase Early Detection and Identification of Fatigue Damage in Thrust Ball Bearings by an Acoustic Emission Technique , 2020 .

[4]  S. Shevchik,et al.  Modelling and monitoring of abrasive finishing processes using artificial intelligence techniques: A review , 2020 .

[5]  Alan Beerbower Mechanical Failure Prognosis Through Oil Debris Monitoring , 1975 .

[6]  Takehisa Yairi,et al.  Anomaly Detection Using Autoencoders with Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction , 2014, MLSDA'14.

[7]  B. Bhushan Introduction to Tribology: Bhushan/Introduction , 2013 .

[8]  Kenneth Holmberg,et al.  Influence of tribology on global energy consumption, costs and emissions , 2017, Friction.

[9]  Dirk Söffker,et al.  Acoustic Emission-Based Identification and Classification of Frictional Wear of Metallic Surfaces , 2014 .

[10]  Yuanzhong Hu,et al.  Simulation of Sliding Wear in Mixed Lubrication , 2007 .

[11]  Kojj Kato,et al.  Abrasive wear of metals , 1997 .

[12]  Mannur J. Sundaresan,et al.  Analysis of experimentally generated friction related acoustic emission signals , 2012 .

[13]  S. Al-Dossary,et al.  Observations of changes in acoustic emission waveform for varying seeded defect sizes in a rolling element bearing , 2009 .

[14]  Hiromitsu Nishizaki,et al.  Data augmentation and feature extraction using variational autoencoder for acoustic modeling , 2017, 2017 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC).

[15]  Alan Hase,et al.  The relationship between acoustic emissions and wear particles for repeated dry rubbing , 2008 .

[16]  Gwidon Stachowiak,et al.  A review of scuffing models , 1996 .

[17]  Richard H. Sherman,et al.  Chaotic communications in the presence of noise , 1993, Optics & Photonics.

[18]  Wenjian Cai,et al.  Mechanical Wear Debris Feature, Detection, and Diagnosis: A Review , 2017 .

[19]  Takashi Yamamoto,et al.  Relationship between Growth of Rolling Contact Fatigue Cracks and Load Distribution , 2000 .

[20]  Lovedeep Gondara,et al.  Medical Image Denoising Using Convolutional Denoising Autoencoders , 2016, 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW).

[21]  Natalia Gimelshein,et al.  PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library , 2019, NeurIPS.

[22]  N. Tandon,et al.  Detection of particle contamination in journal bearing using acoustic emission and vibration monitoring techniques , 2019, Tribology International.

[23]  E. M. Kudryavtsev,et al.  Modelling of the parameters of acoustic emission under sliding friction of solids , 1997 .

[24]  Hosseini Sadegh,et al.  Classification of acoustic emission signals generated from journal bearing at different lubrication conditions based on wavelet analysis in combination with artificial neural network and genetic algorithm , 2016 .

[25]  T. Thankachan,et al.  Machine Learning and Statistical Approach to Predict and Analyze Wear Rates in Copper Surface Composites , 2020, Metals and Materials International.

[26]  Brandon A. Krick,et al.  In situ thermal measurements of sliding contacts , 2013 .

[27]  S. Lingard,et al.  Sliding wear studies using acoustic emission , 1993 .

[28]  Athanasios Alexopoulos,et al.  Mechanisms. , 2021, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[29]  B. I. Voronenko Acoustic emission during phase transformations in alloys , 1982 .

[30]  V. Sugumaran,et al.  Machine learning approach for automated visual inspection of machine components , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  A. Dyson,et al.  The Failure of Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Circumferentially Ground Discs , 1976 .

[32]  Alan Hase,et al.  Correlation between features of acoustic emission signals and mechanical wear mechanisms , 2012 .

[33]  Wahyu Caesarendra,et al.  A Review of Feature Extraction Methods in Vibration-Based Condition Monitoring and Its Application for Degradation Trend Estimation of Low-Speed Slew Bearing , 2017 .

[34]  Ying Tan,et al.  Variational Autoencoder for Semi-Supervised Text Classification , 2017, AAAI.

[35]  Sergey A. Shevchik,et al.  Prediction of Failure in Lubricated Surfaces Using Acoustic Time–Frequency Features and Random Forest Algorithm , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[36]  C.E. Shannon,et al.  Communication in the Presence of Noise , 1949, Proceedings of the IRE.

[38]  K. Wasmer,et al.  Acoustic emission and machine learning based classification of wear generated using a pin-on-disc tribometer equipped with a digital holographic microscope , 2021, Wear.

[39]  Kilian Wasmer,et al.  Automatic detection of scuffing using acoustic emission , 2016 .

[40]  Sergey A. Shevchik,et al.  Monitoring of friction-related failures using diffusion maps of acoustic time series , 2021, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[41]  T. Tjahjowidodo,et al.  Use of Acoustic Emissions to detect change in contact mechanisms caused by tool wear in abrasive belt grinding process , 2019, Wear.

[42]  Hisae Yoshizawa,et al.  Fundamental mechanisms of interfacial friction. 1. Relation between adhesion and friction , 1993 .

[43]  H. Spikes Mixed lubrication — an overview , 1997 .

[44]  Narendiranath Babu Thamba,et al.  Automatic Fault Classification for Journal Bearings Using ANN and DNN , 2018, Archives of Acoustics.

[45]  Hongxun Yao,et al.  Auto-encoder based dimensionality reduction , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[46]  Acoustic output from stick-slip friction☆ , 1986 .

[47]  R. Morrison,et al.  Quantitative determination of wear metals in engine oils using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: A comparison between liquid jets and static liquids ☆ , 2005 .

[48]  Jonathan G. Pelham,et al.  Friction and Wear Monitoring Methods for Journal Bearings of Geared Turbofans Based on Acoustic Emission Signals and Machine Learning , 2020, Lubricants.

[49]  Robert X. Gao,et al.  An efficient approach to machine health diagnosis based on harmonic wavelet packet transform , 2005 .

[50]  Tegoeh Tjahjowidodo,et al.  In-process virtual verification of weld seam removal in robotic abrasive belt grinding process using deep learning , 2019, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing.

[51]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Introduction to Tribology , 2002 .

[52]  W. Sawyer,et al.  Accessing Inaccessible Interfaces: In Situ Approaches to Materials Tribology , 2008 .

[53]  D. K. Dwivedi Adhesive wear behaviour of cast aluminium–silicon alloys: Overview , 2010 .

[55]  Christoph Schneidhofer,et al.  Wear intensity evaluation in conveying systems – An acoustic emission and vibration measurement approach , 2020 .

[56]  Kenneth C. Ludema,et al.  A review of scuffing and running-in of lubricated surfaces, with asperities and oxides in perspective , 1984 .

[57]  C.E. Shannon,et al.  Communication in the Presence of Noise , 1949, Proceedings of the IRE.

[58]  Patrik Hoffmann,et al.  Origin of scuffing in grey cast iron-steel tribo-system , 2017 .

[59]  D. Arnell Mechanisms and laws of friction and wear , 2010 .

[60]  Satish C. Sharma,et al.  Fault diagnosis of ball bearings using machine learning methods , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[61]  Zhicheng Zhang,et al.  Formation of the third bodies of steel sliding against brass under lubricated conditions , 2019, Tribology International.