Safe human robot interaction via energy regulation control

This paper presents an energy-based control strategy to be used in robotic systems working closely or cooperating with humans. The presented method bounds the dangerous behavior of the robot during the first instants of the impact by limiting the energy stored into the system to a maximum imposed value.Two critical physical human robot interaction (pHRI) cases are studied, these are the collision either against a free or a clamped head. Safe energy values that can be used as reference were retrieved by analysing experimental data of energy absorption to failure of cranium bones and cervical spinal cords.The energy regulation control is implemented in a series elastic actuator prototype joint. The model and the control scheme of the system are analysed. The proposed control scheme is a position-based controller that adjusts the position trajectory reference in function of the maximum energy value imposed by the user. Preliminary results are presented to show that the actuator unit and this control scheme are capable of limiting the energy to a maximum imposed value.

[1]  Michael R. Zinn,et al.  A New Actuation Approach for Human Friendly Robot Design , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[2]  J. Versace A Review of the Severity Index , 1971 .

[3]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[4]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[5]  Henry Dreyfuss,et al.  Measure of Man and Woman: Human Factors in Design , 1993 .

[6]  A. Hockley,et al.  Intracranial volume change in childhood. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Human head-neck biomechanics under axial tension. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  S. Margulies,et al.  Infant skull and suture properties: measurements and implications for mechanisms of pediatric brain injury. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  Jerry E. Pratt,et al.  Intuitive control of a planar bipedal walking robot , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[10]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The role of the robot mass and velocity in physical human-robot interaction - Part I: Non-constrained blunt impacts , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  VSA-II: a novel prototype of variable stiffness actuator for safe and performing robots interacting with humans , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Design and Control of a Variable Stiffness Actuator for Safe and Fast Physical Human/Robot Interaction , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Safety Evaluation of Physical Human-Robot Interaction via Crash-Testing , 2007, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[14]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[15]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A compact soft actuator unit for small scale human friendly robots , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[17]  J. L. Wood,et al.  Dynamic response of human cranial bone. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Collision Detection and Safe Reaction with the DLR-III Lightweight Manipulator Arm , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[19]  Estimation Of Cranial Volume-an Overview Of Methodologies , 2004 .