Nonlinear finite element model updating for damage identification of civil structures using batch Bayesian estimation

Abstract This paper presents a framework for structural health monitoring (SHM) and damage identification of civil structures. This framework integrates advanced mechanics-based nonlinear finite element (FE) modeling and analysis techniques with a batch Bayesian estimation approach to estimate time-invariant model parameters used in the FE model of the structure of interest. The framework uses input excitation and dynamic response of the structure and updates a nonlinear FE model of the structure to minimize the discrepancies between predicted and measured response time histories. The updated FE model can then be interrogated to detect, localize, classify, and quantify the state of damage and predict the remaining useful life of the structure. As opposed to recursive estimation methods, in the batch Bayesian estimation approach, the entire time history of the input excitation and output response of the structure are used as a batch of data to estimate the FE model parameters through a number of iterations. In the case of non-informative prior, the batch Bayesian method leads to an extended maximum likelihood (ML) estimation method to estimate jointly time-invariant model parameters and the measurement noise amplitude. The extended ML estimation problem is solved efficiently using a gradient-based interior-point optimization algorithm. Gradient-based optimization algorithms require the FE response sensitivities with respect to the model parameters to be identified. The FE response sensitivities are computed accurately and efficiently using the direct differentiation method (DDM). The estimation uncertainties are evaluated based on the Cramer–Rao lower bound (CRLB) theorem by computing the exact Fisher Information matrix using the FE response sensitivities with respect to the model parameters. The accuracy of the proposed uncertainty quantification approach is verified using a sampling approach based on the unscented transformation. Two validation studies, based on realistic structural FE models of a bridge pier and a moment resisting steel frame, are performed to validate the performance and accuracy of the presented nonlinear FE model updating approach and demonstrate its application to SHM. These validation studies show the excellent performance of the proposed framework for SHM and damage identification even in the presence of high measurement noise and/or way-out initial estimates of the model parameters. Furthermore, the detrimental effects of the input measurement noise on the performance of the proposed framework are illustrated and quantified through one of the validation studies.

[1]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  A trust region method based on interior point techniques for nonlinear programming , 2000, Math. Program..

[2]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Bayesian Methods for Updating Dynamic Models , 2011 .

[3]  K. Yuen Bayesian Methods for Structural Dynamics and Civil Engineering , 2010 .

[4]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Application of Nonlinear Model Updating for a Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall , 2013 .

[5]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Material Parameter Identification in Distributed Plasticity FE Models of Frame-Type Structures Using Nonlinear Stochastic Filtering , 2015 .

[6]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Nonlinear Structural Finite Element Model Updating Using Stochastic Filtering , 2015 .

[7]  Shamim N. Pakzad,et al.  Generalized Response Surface Model Updating Using Time Domain Data , 2014 .

[8]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Time domain estimation of structural parameters , 1988 .

[9]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  An Interior Point Algorithm for Large-Scale Nonlinear Programming , 1999, SIAM J. Optim..

[10]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[11]  D. Simon Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H Infinity, and Nonlinear Approaches , 2006 .

[12]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[13]  T. Moon,et al.  Mathematical Methods and Algorithms for Signal Processing , 1999 .

[14]  Eleni Chatzi,et al.  Experimental application of on-line parametric identification for nonlinear hysteretic systems with model uncertainty , 2010 .

[15]  Graham C. Goodwin,et al.  Dynamic System Identification: Experiment Design and Data Analysis , 2012 .

[16]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Damage identification study of a seven-story full-scale building slice tested on the UCSD-NEES shake table , 2010 .

[17]  Duong Hien Tran,et al.  Parameter Sensitivity in Nonlinear Mechanics: Theory and Finite Element Computations , 1997 .

[18]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .

[19]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Dynamic response sensitivity of inelastic structures , 1993 .

[20]  Tshilidzi Marwala,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating Using Computational Intelligence Techniques: Applications to Structural Dynamics , 2010 .

[21]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Nonlinear Structural Finite Element Model Updating Using Batch Bayesian Estimation , 2015 .

[22]  J. Beck,et al.  Updating Models and Their Uncertainties. I: Bayesian Statistical Framework , 1998 .

[23]  M. Hoshiya,et al.  Structural Identification by Extended Kalman Filter , 1984 .

[24]  Creto Augusto Vidal,et al.  The consistent tangent operator for design sensitivity analysis of history-dependent response , 1991 .

[25]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Damage Detection of Hysteretic Structures with a Pinching Effect , 2014 .

[26]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification in the Assessment of Progressive Damage in a 7-Story Full-Scale Building Slice , 2013 .

[27]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Consistent Finite-Element Response Sensitivity Analysis , 2003 .

[28]  Carlos H. Muravchik,et al.  Posterior Cramer-Rao bounds for discrete-time nonlinear filtering , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[29]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Nonlinear structural design sensivitity analysis for path dependent problems. Part 1: General theory , 1990 .

[30]  J. Beck,et al.  Bayesian Updating of Structural Models and Reliability using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation , 2002 .

[31]  Andrew W. Smyth,et al.  Application of the unscented Kalman filter for real‐time nonlinear structural system identification , 2007 .

[32]  Nilanjan Saha,et al.  Extended Kalman filters using explicit and derivative-free local linearizations , 2009 .

[33]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[34]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  A new damage index for plane steel frames exhibiting strength and stiffness degradation under seismic motion , 2013 .

[35]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Real-Time Dynamic Model Updating of a Hysteretic Structural System , 2014 .

[36]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Extended Kalman filter for material parameter estimation in nonlinear structural finite element models using direct differentiation method , 2015 .

[37]  Eleni Chatzi,et al.  The unscented Kalman filter and particle filter methods for nonlinear structural system identification with non‐collocated heterogeneous sensing , 2009 .

[38]  J. Beck,et al.  Bayesian State and Parameter Estimation of Uncertain Dynamical Systems , 2006 .

[39]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Efficient model updating and health monitoring methodology using incomplete modal data without mode matching , 2006 .

[40]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[41]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Bayesian parameter identification of hysteretic behavior of composite walls , 2013 .

[42]  Ralph E. Hudson,et al.  Parametric Identification of Nondegrading Hysteresis in a Laterally and Torsionally Coupled Building Using an Unscented Kalman Filter , 2013 .

[43]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  Cumulative damage in steel structures subjected to earthquake ground motions , 1983 .

[44]  J. Beck Bayesian system identification based on probability logic , 2010 .

[45]  Zhang Yigong,et al.  Nonlinear structural identification using extended kalman filter , 1994 .

[46]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Unified Probabilistic Approach for Model Updating and Damage , 2006 .

[47]  James L. Beck,et al.  Bayesian Updating and Model Class Selection for Hysteretic Structural Models Using Stochastic Simulation , 2008 .

[48]  Akshay Gupta,et al.  Behavior of Ductile SMRFs at Various Seismic Hazard Levels , 2000 .

[49]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  The use of damage functionals in earthquake engineering: A comparison between different methods , 1993 .

[50]  Simo Puntanen,et al.  Schur complements in statistics and probability , 2005 .