Dynamic Relationship Building: Exploitation Versus Exploration on a Social Network

Interpersonal relations facilitate information flow and give rise to positional advantage of individuals in a social network. We ask the question: How would an individual build relations with members of a dynamic social network in order to arrive at a central position in the network? We formalize this question using the dynamic network building problem. Two strategies stand out to solve this problem: The first directs the individual to exploit their social proximity by linking to nodes that are close-by, while the second tries its best to explore distant regions of the network. We evaluate and contrast these two strategies with respect to edge- and distance-based cost metrics, as well as other structural properties such as embeddedness and clustering coefficient. Experiments are performed on models of dynamic random graphs and real-world data sets. We then discuss and test ways that combine these two strategies.

[1]  Jiamou Liu,et al.  Network, Popularity and Social Cohesion: A Game-Theoretic Approach , 2016, AAAI.

[2]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Julie Fournet,et al.  Data on face-to-face contacts in an office building suggest a low-cost vaccination strategy based on community linkers , 2014, Network Science.

[4]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[5]  P. Bearman,et al.  Suicide and friendships among American adolescents. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[6]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network science , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[7]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[8]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  Networks of military alliances, wars, and international trade , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  John F. Padgett,et al.  Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434 , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Linyuan Lu,et al.  Link Prediction in Complex Networks: A Survey , 2010, ArXiv.

[11]  E. David,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World , 2010 .

[12]  June Cotte,et al.  The Role of Network Centrality in the Flow of Consumer Influence , 2010 .

[13]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  What's in a crowd? Analysis of face-to-face behavioral networks , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Jiamou Liu,et al.  What Becomes of the Broken Hearted?: An Agent-Based Approach to Self-Evaluation, Interpersonal Loss, and Suicide Ideation , 2017, AAMAS.

[15]  P. Bonacich Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Jiamou Liu,et al.  Togetherness: An algorithmic approach to network integration , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[17]  R. Gulati Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[18]  E. Morrison,et al.  NEWCOMERS' RELATIONSHIPS: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL NETWORK TIES DURING SOCIALIZATION , 2002 .

[19]  K. Gleditsch,et al.  Expanded Trade and GDP Data , 2002 .

[20]  Filip Agneessens,et al.  Geodesic based centrality: Unifying the local and the global , 2017, Soc. Networks.

[21]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Identifying sets of key players in a social network , 2006, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[22]  Jiamou Liu,et al.  How to Build Your Network? A Structural Analysis , 2016, IJCAI.

[23]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[24]  Patricia E. Tweet Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2006 .

[25]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[26]  Kun Deng,et al.  Balancing exploration and exploitation: a new algorithm for active machine learning , 2005, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'05).

[27]  Peter Auer,et al.  Finite-time Analysis of the Multiarmed Bandit Problem , 2002, Machine Learning.

[28]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[29]  Albert-Lszl Barabsi,et al.  Network Science , 2016, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[30]  M. Jackson A Survey of Models of Network Formation: Stability and Efficiency , 2003 .

[31]  Forrest R. Pitts,et al.  The medieval river trade network of Russia revisited , 1978 .

[32]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  J. Bolland,et al.  Sorting out centrality: An analysis of the performance of four centrality models in real and simulated networks , 1988 .

[34]  Jiamou Liu,et al.  Integrating Networks of Equipotent Nodes , 2016, CSoNet.

[35]  Haifeng Xu,et al.  Using Social Networks to Aid Homeless Shelters: Dynamic Influence Maximization under Uncertainty , 2016, AAMAS.

[36]  Brian W. Rogers,et al.  Meeting Strangers and Friends of Friends: How Random are Social Networks? , 2007 .

[37]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups , 2001 .

[38]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Random Graphs: Notation , 2001 .