Brain activity while reading words and pseudo-words: a comparison between dyslexic and fluent readers.

In recent years many studies have focused on brain activity differences between fluent and dyslexic readers in order to understand the neural basis of dyslexia. The aim of the current study was to examine the processing of words and pseudo-words in the two hemispheres among dyslexic as compared to fluent readers, using behavioral, and electrophysiological source estimation measures. Two matched groups of university students, fluent and dyslexic readers, performed a lexical decision task in order to examine the processes of word recognition. Dyslexic readers showed overall less activity than fluent readers, mainly during late processing stages. In addition, the distinctive patterns of activity for words and pseudo-words displayed by fluent readers were not apparent in dyslexic readers. In particular, the increased activation of left-hemisphere language areas found in response to pseudo-words was absent in dyslexics. These findings are further evidence of orthographic and phonological impairments in dyslexia.

[1]  H. Pratt,et al.  High-resolution time course of hemispheric dominance revealed by low-resolution electromagnetic tomography , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  E M Glaser,et al.  Event related potentials and time estimation. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[3]  M. Laine,et al.  Neurocognitive processing of auditorily and visually presented inflected words and pseudowords: Evidence from a morphologically rich language , 2009, Brain Research.

[4]  A. Mechelli,et al.  Neuroimaging Studies of Word and Pseudoword Reading: Consistencies, Inconsistencies, and Limitations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  H. Pratt,et al.  Auditory event related potentials and source current density estimation in phonologic/auditory dyslexics , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  R. Chapman,et al.  EP Component Identification and Measurement by Principal Components-Analysis , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[7]  C. Leong,et al.  Phonological and morphological processing in adult students with learning/reading disabilities. , 1999, Journal of learning disabilities.

[8]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of Impaired Reading in Dyslexia , 2004, The Cognitive Neuroscience of Reading.

[9]  Roberto D. Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Functional imaging with low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) : review, new comparisons, and new validation , 2002 .

[10]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Cerebral mechanisms involved in word reading in dyslexic children: a magnetic source imaging approach. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  J. Raven Advanced progressive matrices : sets I and II , 1962 .

[12]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  R Hari,et al.  Auditory stream segregation in dyslexic adults. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  Evelyne Corcos,et al.  A Developmental Study of the Processing of Orthographic Information in Children with Varying Reading Ability. , 1989 .

[15]  R. Frackowiak,et al.  Demonstrating the implicit processing of visually presented words and pseudowords. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  J. Hinojosa,et al.  Neural activity associated with metaphor comprehension: spatial analysis , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Abnormal activation of temporoparietal language areas during phonetic analysis in children with dyslexia. , 2003, Neuropsychology.

[18]  D. Francis,et al.  Persistence of dyslexia: the Connecticut Longitudinal Study at adolescence. , 1999, Pediatrics.

[19]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[20]  J D Watson,et al.  Nonparametric Analysis of Statistic Images from Functional Mapping Experiments , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[21]  C. Perfetti Psycholinguistics and reading ability. , 1994 .

[22]  M. Bruck Outcomes of adults with childhood histories of dyslexia , 1998 .

[23]  Margaret J. Snowling,et al.  Phonological processing skills of dyslexic students in higher education: A preliminary report , 1997 .

[24]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Lexical memory search during N400: cortical couplings in auditory comprehension , 2004, Neuroreport.

[25]  A. Kok On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[26]  J. Pernier,et al.  ERP Manifestations of Processing Printed Words at Different Psycholinguistic Levels: Time Course and Scalp Distribution , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? , 2004, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[28]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[29]  F. Fazio,et al.  Dyslexia: Cultural Diversity and Biological Unity , 2001, Science.

[30]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Brainwaves are stethoscopes: ERP correlates of novel metaphor comprehension , 2007, Brain Research.

[31]  B. Shaywitz,et al.  A definition of dyslexia , 2003 .

[32]  K. Uutela,et al.  Impaired visual word processing in dyslexia revealed with magnetoencephalography , 1996, Annals of neurology.

[33]  M. Bruck Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits. , 1992 .

[34]  Grégory Simon,et al.  CHRONOMETRY OF VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION DURING PASSIVE AND LEXICAL DECISION TASKS: AN ERP INVESTIGATION , 2004, The International journal of neuroscience.

[35]  Richard K. Wagner,et al.  The Development of Orthographic Processing Ability , 1994 .

[36]  C M Michel,et al.  Spatiotemporal EEG analysis and distributed source estimation in presurgical epilepsy evaluation. , 1999, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[37]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[38]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[39]  R. N. Davis,et al.  Dyslexia-specific brain activation profile becomes normal following successful remedial training , 2002, Neurology.

[40]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[41]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Semantic Cortical Activation in Dyslexic Readers , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  K. Nation,et al.  Language, phonology and learning to read , 1997 .

[43]  Naira A. Taroyan,et al.  Reading words and pseudowords in dyslexia: ERP and behavioural tests in English-speaking adolescents. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[44]  A. Liberman,et al.  Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[46]  C. Bernard,et al.  Behavioral performances in participants with phonological dyslexia and different patterns on the N170 component , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[47]  B. Shaywitz,et al.  The Role of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Understanding Reading and Dyslexia , 2006, Developmental neuropsychology.

[48]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The Neural Circuitry Involved in the Reading of German Words and Pseudowords: A PET Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.