Amount Versus Number: Infants' Use of Area and Contour Length to Discriminate Small Sets

Previous research has reported that infants use amount rather than number to discriminate small sets (Clearfield & Mix, 1999). This study sought to replicate and extend this finding. Experiment 1 confirmed that infants respond to changes in contour length but not to changes in number when contour length is controlled. However, contour length and area were confounded in this experiment and the original study. To determine what specific measure of spatial extent infants use to discriminate small sets, Experiment 2 included 2 conditions that varied either area or contour length, but not both. As before, infants responded to the changes in spatial extent-either contour length alone or area alone-but not to the changes in number.

[1]  Prentice Starkey,et al.  The early development of numerical reasoning , 1992, Cognition.

[2]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Similarity and Numerical Equivalence: Appearances Count , 1999 .

[3]  K. Wynn.  Competence models of numerical development , 1997 .

[4]  E. Spelke,et al.  Numerical abstraction by human infants , 1990, Cognition.

[5]  E. W. Ames,et al.  Age Differences in Infants' Attention to Patterns of Different Complexities , 1966, Science.

[6]  B. Karmel,et al.  The effect of age, complexity, and amount of contour on pattern preferences in human infants. , 1969, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  R. Mccall,et al.  Complexity, Contour, and Area as Determinants of Attention in Infants. , 1970 .

[8]  S E Antell,et al.  Perception of numerical invariance in neonates. , 1983, Child development.

[9]  Numerical knowledge in infancy: The number/mass distinction , 1998 .

[10]  L. Demany,et al.  Rhythm perception in early infancy , 1977, Nature.

[11]  L. Sherrod.  Social cognition in infants: Attention to the human face , 1979 .

[12]  G. Bronson,et al.  Infant differences in rate of visual encoding. , 1991, Child development.

[13]  Ernst von Glasersfeld,et al.  Subitizing: The role of figural patterns in the development of numerical concepts. , 1982 .

[14]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Numerical abstraction in infants: another look. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[15]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Origins of Numerical Knowledge. , 1995 .

[16]  N. R. Schultz,et al.  Evaluation of comprehension in young and old adults. , 1987 .

[17]  E. Spelke,et al.  Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  J. Fagan,et al.  Visual attention to size and number of pattern details by term and preterm infants during the first six months. , 1975, Child development.

[19]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Addition and subtraction by human infants , 1992, Nature.

[20]  P. Salapatek,et al.  Visual scanning of triangles by the human newborn. , 1966, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[21]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Number Versus Contour Length in Infants' Discrimination of Small Visual Sets , 1999 .

[22]  Number-Based Expectations and Sequential Enumeration by 5-Month-Old Infants. , 1996 .

[23]  H. Davis,et al.  Numerical competence in animals: Definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  What do infants know about continuous quantity? , 2000, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[25]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[26]  Infant response to facelike patterns under fixed-trial and infant-control procedures. , 1983, Child development.

[27]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Infants' Individuation and Enumeration of Actions , 1996 .

[28]  Susan Carey,et al.  What representations might underlie infant numerical knowledge , 1999 .

[29]  J. Fagan,et al.  Chapter 4 – Early Visual Selectivity: As a Function of Pattern Variables, Previous Exposure, Age from Birth and Conception, and Expected Cognitive Deficit , 1975 .

[30]  P. Starkey,et al.  Perception of numbers by human infants. , 1980, Science.

[31]  E. Gibson.  Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .

[32]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Do infants understand simple arithmetic? A replication of Wynn (1992) ☆ , 1995 .

[33]  P Salapatek,et al.  Visual scanning of geometric figures by the human newborn. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[34]  J. Kagan,et al.  Attention in the infant: effects of complexity, contour, perimeter, and familiarity. , 1967, Child development.

[35]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  T. Simon,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Origins of Number Knowledge: A "Non-Numerical" Account , 1997 .

[37]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation , 1992, Cognition.

[38]  M. Haith,et al.  Infant visual responses to pattern: which metric predicts best? , 1984, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[39]  M. Strauss,et al.  Infant perception of numerosity. , 1981, Child development.

[40]  S. Carey,et al.  Infants’ Metaphysics: The Case of Numerical Identity , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.