Including robustness considerations in the search phase of Many-Objective Robust Decision Making

Many-Objective Robust Decision Making (MORDM) is a prominent model-based approach for dealing with deep uncertainty. MORDM has four phases: a systems analytical problem formulation, a search phase to generate candidate solutions, a trade-off analysis where different strategies are compared across many objectives, and a scenario discovery phase to identify the vulnerabilities. In its original inception, the search phase identifies optimal strategies for a single reference scenario for deep uncertainties, which may result in missing locally near-optimal, but globally more robust strategies. Recent work has addressed this issue by generating candidate strategies for multiple policy-relevant scenarios. In this paper, we incorporate a systematic scenario selection procedure in the search phase to consider both policy relevance and scenario diversity. The results demonstrate an increased tradeoff variety besides higher robustness, compared to the solutions found for a reference scenario. Future research can routinize multi-scenario search in MORDM with the aid of software packages.

[1]  Myles T. Collins,et al.  Managing the Risk of Uncertain Threshold Responses: Comparison of Robust, Optimum, and Precautionary Approaches , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Per Wikman-Svahn,et al.  Choosing small sets of policy-relevant scenarios by combining vulnerability and diversity approaches , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  An updated scenario typology , 2003 .

[4]  Steve Bankes,et al.  Exploratory Modeling for Policy Analysis , 1993, Oper. Res..

[5]  Bartel Van de Walle,et al.  Exploring the future: : Runtime scenario selection for complex and time-bound decisions , 2015 .

[6]  Jonathan D. Herman,et al.  How should robustness be defined for water systems planning under change , 2015 .

[7]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Reducing regional drought vulnerabilities and multi-city robustness conflicts using many-objective optimization under deep uncertainty , 2015 .

[8]  Joseph R. Kasprzyk,et al.  Many objective robust decision making for complex environmental systems undergoing change , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[9]  W. Walker.  Policy analysis: a systematic approach to supporting policymaking in the public sector , 2000 .

[10]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  UNCERTAINTY AND THE MANAGEMENT OF MULTISTATE ECOSYSTEMS: AN APPARENTLY RATIONAL ROUTE TO COLLAPSE , 2003 .

[11]  Olaf Tietje,et al.  Identification of a small reliable and efficient set of consistent scenarios , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Comparing state-of-the-art evolutionary multi-objective algorithms for long-term groundwater monitoring design , 2005 .

[13]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Developing dynamic adaptive policy pathways: a computer-assisted approach for developing adaptive strategies for a deeply uncertain world , 2015, Climatic Change.

[14]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Confronting tipping points: Can multi-objective evolutionary algorithms discover pollution control tradeoffs given environmental thresholds? , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  Neil Strachan,et al.  Reinvigorating the scenario technique to expand uncertainty consideration , 2016, Climatic Change.

[16]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Management of eutrophication for lakes subject to potentially irreversible change , 1999 .

[17]  Benjamin P. Bryant,et al.  Thinking Inside the Box , 2010 .

[18]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Comparing Robust Decision-Making and Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways for model-based decision support under deep uncertainty , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[19]  Jan H. Kwakkel,et al.  An exploratory approach for adaptive policymaking by using multi-objective robust optimization , 2014, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[20]  Jan H. Kwakkel,et al.  The geopolitical impact of the shale revolution: Exploring consequences on energy prices and rentier states , 2016 .

[21]  W. Thissen.  Diagnosing Policy Problem Situations , 2013 .

[22]  Andrea Castelletti,et al.  Is Robustness Really Robust? How Different Definitions of Robustness Impact Decision-making Under Climate Change , 2016 .

[23]  Andrea Castelletti,et al.  Robustness Metrics: How Are They Calculated, When Should They Be Used and Why Do They Give Different Results? , 2018 .

[24]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems , 2002, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[25]  Francky Catthoor,et al.  Systematic Exploration of Power-Aware Scenarios for IEEE 802.11ac WLAN Systems , 2014, 2014 17th Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design.

[26]  Bengt Johansson,et al.  Systematic exploration of scenario spaces , 2016 .

[27]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Many-objective robust decision making for managing an ecosystem with a deeply uncertain threshold response , 2015 .

[28]  Robert J. Lempert,et al.  Scenarios that illuminate vulnerabilities and robust responses , 2013, Climatic Change.

[29]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Direct policy search for robust multi-objective management of deeply uncertain socio-ecological tipping points , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[30]  Vincent Marchau,et al.  Classifying and communicating uncertainties in model-based policy analysis , 2010 .

[31]  K. Reinhardt.  Shaping The Next One Hundred Years New Methods For Quantitative Long Term Policy Analysis , 2016 .

[32]  Evelina Trutnevyte,et al.  EXPANSE methodology for evaluating the economic potential of renewable energy from an energy mix perspective , 2013 .

[33]  Joseph R. Kasprzyk,et al.  Evolutionary multiobjective optimization in water resources: The past, present, and future , 2012 .

[34]  Jan H. Kwakkel,et al.  Improving scenario discovery for handling heterogeneous uncertainties and multinomial classified outcomes , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[35]  Jan H. Kwakkel,et al.  How Robust is a Robust Policy? Comparing Alternative Robustness Metrics for Robust Decision-Making , 2016 .

[36]  David G. Groves,et al.  A General, Analytic Method for Generating Robust Strategies and Narrative Scenarios , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[37]  Joseph R. Kasprzyk,et al.  Incorporating deeply uncertain factors into the many objective search process , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[38]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  An open source framework for many-objective robust decision making , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[39]  P. Reed,et al.  Beyond optimality: Multistakeholder robustness tradeoffs for regional water portfolio planning under deep uncertainty , 2014 .

[40]  Geertje Bekebrede,et al.  How to use a systems diagram to analyse and structure complex problems for policy issue papers , 2011, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[41]  Jan H. Kwakkel,et al.  The Exploratory Modeling Workbench: An open source toolkit for exploratory modeling, scenario discovery, and (multi-objective) robust decision making , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[42]  Vincent Marchau,et al.  Uncertainty in the Framework of Policy Analysis , 2013 .