Context-dependent stimulus presentation to freely moving animals in 3D

The presentation of controllable, dynamic sensory stimuli provides a powerful experimental paradigm, which has been extensively applied to explore sensory processing in walking and tethered flying insects. Recent advances in computer hardware and software technology provide the opportunity to track the 3D flight path of free-flying insects and process these data in real-time, opening up the possibility to present dynamic stimuli to free-flying animals. To accommodate for the increased complexity relating to 3D space, we partitioned experimental design, real-time data acquisition and stimulus control into multiple self-contained modules. 3D experimental scenarios were created in a stand-alone application by forging multiple 3D space-stimulus relationships. The use of dynamic cues is illustrated by an experiment, in which dynamic acoustic cues were presented to a free-flying parasitoid fly in a large 3D environment. The combination of loosely coupled modules provides robust and flexible solutions, allowing new paradigms to be readily implemented based on existing technologies. We demonstrate this with a test system that displayed a complex visual stimulus, controlled in real-time by the 2D position and orientation of a test object. The presented methods are applicable in a variety of novel experimental paradigms, including learning paradigms, for various sensory modalities in walking, swimming and flying animals.

[1]  P Müller,et al.  A shot in the dark: the silent quest of a free-flying phonotactic fly. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[2]  T. Collett,et al.  Chasing behaviour of houseflies (Fannia canicularis) , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[3]  D. Robert,et al.  I. Head movements and the organization of correctional manoeuvres , 1992 .

[4]  Joel Pokorny,et al.  Characterization and use of a digital light projector for vision research , 2001, Vision Research.

[5]  J. Zeil,et al.  Active vision in insects: an analysis of object-directed zig-zag flights in wasps (Odynerus spinipes , Eumenidae) , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[6]  K. Götz,et al.  Optomotor control of course and altitude in Drosophila melanogaster is correlated with distinct activities of at least three pairs of flight steering muscles. , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  Michael H Dickinson,et al.  Fly Flight A Model for the Neural Control of Complex Behavior , 2001, Neuron.

[8]  Karl Georg Götz,et al.  Flight control in Drosophila by visual perception of motion , 1968, Kybernetik.

[9]  J. Zeil,et al.  Ground-nesting bees determine the location of their nest relative to a landmark by other than angular size cues , 1994, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  Hateren,et al.  Blowfly flight and optic flow. I. Thorax kinematics and flight dynamics , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  T. J. Walker,et al.  HOSTS OF A PHONOTACTIC PARASITOID AND LEVELS OF PARASITISM (DIPTERA: TACHINIDAE: ORMIA OCHRACEA) , 1991 .

[12]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Muscle efficiency and elastic storage in the flight motor of Drosophila. , 1995, Science.

[13]  Don R. Reynolds,et al.  Remote-sensing, telemetric and computer-based technologies for investigating insect movement: a survey of existing and potential techniques , 2002 .

[14]  Michael H Dickinson,et al.  Collision-avoidance and landing responses are mediated by separate pathways in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  D. Robert,et al.  Tracking of flying insects using pan-tilt cameras , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Michael H Dickinson,et al.  Odor localization requires visual feedback during free flight in Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[17]  D. Robert,et al.  Free-flight phonotaxis in a parasitoid fly: behavioural thresholds, relative attraction and susceptibility to noise , 2000, Naturwissenschaften.

[18]  Roger C. Hardie,et al.  Light Adaptation in Drosophila Photoreceptors: I. Response Dynamics and Signaling Efficiency at 25°C , 2001 .

[19]  R R Hoy,et al.  Phonotaxis in flying crickets , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[20]  M. Dickinson,et al.  The changes in power requirements and muscle efficiency during elevated force production in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[21]  J. P. Lindemann,et al.  FliMax, a novel stimulus device for panoramic and highspeed presentation of behaviourally generated optic flow , 2003, Vision Research.

[22]  C. Landis Determinants of the critical flicker-fusion threshold. , 1954, Physiological reviews.

[23]  G K Taylor,et al.  Mechanics and aerodynamics of insect flight control , 2001, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[24]  Roland Strauss,et al.  Virtual-Reality Techniques Resolve the Visual Cues Used by Fruit Flies to Evaluate Object Distances , 2002, Current Biology.

[25]  M. Lehrer Why do bees turn back and look? , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[26]  M. Bach,et al.  Raster-scan cathode-ray tubes for vision research--limits of resolution in space, time and intensity, and some solutions. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[27]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Dynamically tuned design of the MFI thorax , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[28]  William H. Cade,et al.  Acoustically Orienting Parasitoids: Fly Phonotaxis to Cricket Song , 1975, Science.

[29]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Temperature and the temporal resolving power of fly photoreceptors , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[30]  L. Goodman,et al.  The Behaviour and physiology of bees , 1991 .

[31]  R R Hoy,et al.  Phonotaxis in flying crickets , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[32]  M. Heisenberg,et al.  Flight control during ‘free yaw turns’ inDrosophila melanogaster , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[33]  Mary A. Johnson,et al.  Microspectrophotometry ofDrosophila visual pigments: Determinations of conversion efficiency in R1–6 receptors , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[34]  Daniel Robert,et al.  II. Acoustic avoidance manoeuvres and associated head movements, compared with correctional steering , 1992 .

[35]  Jim Giles Think like a bee , 2001, Nature.

[36]  S. N. Fry,et al.  The Aerodynamics of Free-Flight Maneuvers in Drosophila , 2003, Science.

[37]  Tobi Delbrück,et al.  Silicon retina with correlation-based, velocity-tuned pixels , 1993, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[38]  J. Zeil The control of optic flow during learning flights , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[39]  Andreas Voss,et al.  Can a fly ride a bicycle , 1992 .

[40]  R. Wehner Spatial Vision in Arthropods , 1981 .

[41]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  HOVERING FLIGHT FOR A MICROMECHANICAL FLYING INSECT: MODELING AND ROBUST CONTROL SYNTHESIS , 2002 .

[42]  M. Dickinson,et al.  A comparison of visual and haltere-mediated equilibrium reflexes in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[43]  T. Collett,et al.  Visual control of flight behaviour in the hoverflySyritta pipiens L. , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.

[44]  Karl Geokg Götz,et al.  Optomotorische Untersuchung des visuellen systems einiger Augenmutanten der Fruchtfliege Drosophila , 1964, Kybernetik.

[45]  P. Colgan,et al.  Animal Homing , 1992, Chapman & Hall Animal Behaviour Series.

[46]  Michael H Dickinson,et al.  A signature of salience in the Drosophila brain , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  Werner Reichardt,et al.  Optical detection and fixation of objects by fixed flying flies , 1969, Naturwissenschaften.

[48]  D. Robert THE AUDITORY BEHAVIOUR OF FLYING LOCUSTS , 1989 .