Temporal synchrony is an effective cue for grouping and segmentation in the absence of form cues.

The synchronous change of a feature across multiple discrete elements, i.e., temporal synchrony, has been shown to be a powerful cue for grouping and segmentation. This has been demonstrated with both static and dynamic stimuli for a range of tasks. However, in addition to temporal synchrony, stimuli in previous research have included other cues which can also facilitate grouping and segmentation, such as good continuation and coherent spatial configuration. To evaluate the effectiveness of temporal synchrony for grouping and segmentation in isolation, here we measure signal detection thresholds using a global-Gabor stimulus in the presence/absence of a synchronous event. We also examine the impact of the spatial proximity of the to-be-grouped elements on the effectiveness of temporal synchrony, and the duration for which elements are bound together following a synchronous event in the absence of further segmentation cues. The results show that temporal synchrony (in isolation) is an effective cue for grouping local elements together to extract a global signal. Further, we find that the effectiveness of temporal synchrony as a cue for segmentation is modulated by the spatial proximity of signal elements. Finally, we demonstrate that following a synchronous event, elements are perceptually bound together for an average duration of 200 ms.

[1]  D H HUBEL,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Patrick T. Goodbourn,et al.  Spatial limitations of fast temporal segmentation are best modeled by V1 receptive fields. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[3]  S. Dakin,et al.  Snakes and ladders: the role of temporal modulation in visual contour integration , 2001, Vision Research.

[4]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Filtering Reveals Form in Temporally Structured Displays , 1999 .

[5]  J. Movshon,et al.  Cortical oscillatory responses do not affect visual segmentation , 1996, Vision Research.

[6]  Mark Edwards,et al.  The detection of multiple global directions: capacity limits with spatially segregated and transparent-motion signals. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[7]  P. Milner A model for visual shape recognition. , 1974, Psychological review.

[8]  N. Prins The psi-marginal adaptive method: How to give nuisance parameters the attention they deserve (no more, no less). , 2013, Journal of vision.

[9]  D. Badcock,et al.  Discrimination of global-motion signal strength , 1998, Vision Research.

[10]  J Edwin Dickinson,et al.  Selective attention contributes to global processing in vision. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[11]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[12]  Farid I. Kandil,et al.  Figure–ground segregation can rely on differences in motion direction , 2004, Vision Research.

[13]  E. Vaadia,et al.  Spatiotemporal firing patterns in the frontal cortex of behaving monkeys. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Neural synergy in visual grouping: when good continuation meets common fate , 2001, Vision Research.

[16]  R Blake,et al.  Visual form created solely from temporal structure. , 1999, Science.

[17]  Christoph von der Malsburg,et al.  The Correlation Theory of Brain Function , 1994 .

[18]  Mark Edwards,et al.  Role of form information in motion pooling and segmentation. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[19]  S. Nishida,et al.  Adaptive pooling of visual motion signals by the human visual system revealed with a novel multi-element stimulus. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[20]  Marius Usher,et al.  Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception , 1998, Nature.

[21]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  R. Blake,et al.  Visual features that vary together over time group together over space , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  UTE LEONARDS,et al.  The Influence of Temporal Phase Differences on Texture Segmentation , 1996, Vision Research.

[24]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[25]  E. Castet,et al.  High temporal frequency synchrony is insufficient for perceptual grouping , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Virginie van Wassenhove,et al.  Temporal Structure in Audiovisual Sensory Selection , 2012, PloS one.

[27]  C. Koch,et al.  Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness , 1990 .

[28]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Synchrony does not promote grouping in temporally structured displays , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[30]  Randolph Blake,et al.  The role of temporal structure in human vision. , 2005, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[31]  R. Efron,et al.  The visual persistence of a moving stroboscopically illuminated object. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[32]  C. Tyler,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold , 1999, Vision Research.

[33]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[34]  Isamu Motoyoshi,et al.  The role of spatial interactions in perceptual synchrony. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[35]  Jon Driver,et al.  Edge-Assignment and Figure–Ground Segmentation in Short-Term Visual Matching , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  R Efron,et al.  The minimum duration of a perception. , 1970, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  E. Adelson,et al.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns , 1982, Nature.

[38]  Mark Edwards,et al.  Common-fate motion processing: Interaction of the On and Off pathways , 2009, Vision Research.

[39]  Jean Lorenceau,et al.  Superposition catastrophe and form-motion binding. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[40]  Ad Aertsen,et al.  Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networks , 1999, Nature.

[41]  E. Averbach,et al.  Short-term memory in vision , 1961 .

[42]  J. Ross,et al.  Spatial limitations of temporal segmentation , 1999, Vision Research.

[43]  Hany Farid,et al.  Temporal synchrony in perceptual grouping: a critique , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  K Nakayama,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth: Its Relation to Image Segmentation, Grouping, and the Recognition of Occluded Objects , 1989, Perception.

[45]  I Kovács,et al.  A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.