A Little More than Kind and Less than Kin: The Unwarranted Use of Kin Selection in Spatial Models of Communication

It has become increasingly apparent that spatial and other forms of ecological situatedness can introduce radical differences in the evolutionary outcome of models of conflictive social behavior. Cooperative interactions are often found to have an increased viability in spatially situated models. One possible explanation for this phenomenon makes use of kin-selective arguments according to which high relatedness between neighbors stabilizes cooperation. Unfortunately, in some cases the argument does not go beyond the merely verbal. This paper shows that an explanation in terms of kin selection can easily be tested in a computer simulation and that, in the particular case treated here, the result of such verification is negative thus strengthening previous conclusions regarding the relevance of other factors such as discreteness, stochasticity and ecological organization.

[1]  Seth Bullock,et al.  An exploration of signalling behaviour by both analytic and simulation means for both discrete and continuous models , 1997 .

[2]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  The evolution of cooperation in a lattice-structured population. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  David C. Krakauer,et al.  Spatial structure and the evolution of honest cost-free signalling , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  David H. Ackley,et al.  Altruism in the evolution of communication , 1994 .

[5]  M Oliphant,et al.  The dilemma of Saussurean communication. , 1996, Bio Systems.

[6]  J. Holland,et al.  RNA virus quasispecies populations can suppress vastly superior mutant progeny , 1990, Journal of virology.

[7]  D. Queller,et al.  ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  K F Goodnight,et al.  The Effect of Stochastic Variation on Kin Selection in a Budding-Viscous Population , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[9]  M N,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation in a Lattice-Structured Population , 1996 .

[10]  Guillermo Abramson,et al.  Statistics of extinction and survival in Lotka-Volterra systems , 1998, adap-org/9805001.

[11]  J K Kelly,et al.  Kin selection in density regulated populations. , 1992, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  J. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach , 1978 .

[13]  M. Baalen,et al.  The Unit of Selection in Viscous Populations and the Evolution of Altruism. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Ezequiel A. Di Paolo,et al.  Ecological symmetry breaking can favour the evolution of altruism in an action-response game. , 2000 .

[15]  R. Durrett,et al.  The Importance of Being Discrete (and Spatial) , 1994 .

[16]  D. Lendrem Modelling in Behavioural Ecology , 1986, Studies in Behavioural Adaptation.

[17]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  Kessler,et al.  RNA virus evolution via a fitness-space model. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[19]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[20]  Jason Noble Evolved signals: expensive hype vs. conspiratorial whispers , 1998 .

[21]  Ezequiel Alejandro Di Paolo,et al.  On the evolutionary and behavioral dynamics of social coordination : models and theoretical aspects , 1999 .

[22]  Ezequiel A. Di Paolo,et al.  An Investigation into the Evolution of Communication , 1998, Adapt. Behav..

[23]  Stewart W. Wilson,et al.  From Animals to Animats 5. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior , 1997 .

[24]  Peter D. Taylor,et al.  Inclusive fitness in a homogeneous environment , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Dave Cliff,et al.  On simulating the evolution of communication , 1996 .

[26]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.