A stable home‐base promotes allocentric memory representations of episodic‐like everyday spatial memory

A key issue in neurobiological studies of episodic‐like memory is the geometric frame of reference in which memory traces of experience are stored. Assumptions are sometimes made that specific protocols favour either allocentric (map‐like) or egocentric (body‐centred) representations. There are, however, grounds for suspecting substantial ambiguity about coding strategy, including the necessity to use both frames of reference occasionally, but tests of memory representation are not routinely conducted. Using rats trained to find and dig up food in sandwells at a particular place in an event arena (episodic‐like 'action‐where' encoding), we show that a protocol previously thought to foster allocentric encoding is ambiguous but more predisposed towards egocentric encoding. Two changes in training protocol were examined with a view to promoting preferential allocentric encoding—one in which multiple start locations were used within a session as well as between sessions; and another that deployed a stable home‐base to which the animals had to carry food reward. Only the stable home‐base protocol led to excellent choice performance which rigorous analyses revealed to be blocked by occluding extra‐arena cues when this was done after encoding but before recall. The implications of these findings for studies of episodic‐like memory are that the representational framework of memory at the start of a recall trial will likely include a path direction in the egocentric case but path destination in the allocentric protocol. This difference should be observable in single‐unit recording or calcium‐imaging studies of spatially‐tuned cells.

[1]  R. Morris,et al.  Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions , 1982, Nature.

[2]  Adam Johnson,et al.  Neural Ensembles in CA3 Transiently Encode Paths Forward of the Animal at a Decision Point , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Roddy M. Grieves,et al.  Place cells on a maze encode routes rather than destinations , 2016, eLife.

[4]  R. Morris,et al.  Silent Learning , 2018, Current Biology.

[5]  R. Morris Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat , 1984, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Everyday memory: towards a translationally effective method of modelling the encoding, forgetting and enhancement of memory , 2017, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  R. Morris,et al.  Delay‐dependent impairment of a matching‐to‐place task with chronic and intrahippocampal infusion of the NMDA‐antagonist D‐AP5 , 1999, Hippocampus.

[8]  J. Pearce,et al.  Neural systems underlying episodic memory: insights from animal research. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  Dorothy Tse,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S5 Tables S1 to S3 Electron Impact (ei) Mass Spectra Chemical Ionization (ci) Mass Spectra References Schemas and Memory Consolidation Research Articles Research Articles Research Articles Research Articles , 2022 .

[10]  R. Morris,et al.  Locus coeruleus and dopaminergic consolidation of everyday memory , 2016, Nature.

[11]  Emma R Wood,et al.  Associative recognition and the hippocampus: Differential effects of hippocampal lesions on object‐place, object‐context and object‐place‐context memory , 2009, Hippocampus.

[12]  L. L. Buckley,et al.  Use of foraging trails by Norway rats , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  L. Swanson The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, George Paxinos, Charles Watson (Eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1982), vii + 153, $35.00, ISBN: 0 125 47620 5 , 1984 .

[14]  Dennis Chan,et al.  The Honeycomb Maze provides a novel test to study hippocampal-dependent spatial navigation , 2018, Nature.

[15]  A. Ennaceur,et al.  A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. III. Spatial vs. non-spatial working memory , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[16]  R. Sutherland,et al.  A behavioural analysis of spatial localization following electrolytic, kainate- or colchicine-induced damage to the hippocampal formation in the rat , 1983, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  Y. Dudai The restless engram: consolidations never end. , 2012, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  Ian Q. Whishaw,et al.  Food carrying: a new method for naturalistic studies of spontaneous and forced alternation , 1995, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Bruce L. McNaughton,et al.  Path integration and the neural basis of the 'cognitive map' , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  D Marr,et al.  Simple memory: a theory for archicortex. , 1971, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  E. Tolman Cognitive maps in rats and men. , 1948, Psychological review.

[23]  J. Delacour,et al.  A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: Behavioral data , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[24]  Nachum Ulanovsky,et al.  Vectorial representation of spatial goals in the hippocampus of bats , 2017, Science.

[25]  R. Morris,et al.  Relevance of synaptic tagging and capture to the persistence of long-term potentiation and everyday spatial memory , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  Double dissociation of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on acquisition of two water maze tasks: further evidence for multiple memory systems. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[27]  Alexander Easton,et al.  Recollection in an episodic-like memory task in the rat. , 2005, Learning & memory.

[28]  M. Moser,et al.  A prefrontal–thalamo–hippocampal circuit for goal-directed spatial navigation , 2015, Nature.

[29]  R. Morris,et al.  Elements of a neurobiological theory of hippocampal function: the role of synaptic plasticity, synaptic tagging and schemas , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[30]  Blake A. Richards,et al.  The Persistence and Transience of Memory , 2017, Neuron.

[31]  Lisa M. Giocomo,et al.  Remembered reward locations restructure entorhinal spatial maps , 2019, Science.

[32]  I. Whishaw Place Learning in Hippocampal Rats and the Path Integration Hypothesis , 1998, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[33]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  Spatial firing patterns of hippocampal complex-spike cells in a fixed environment , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[34]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Dead reckoning (path integration) requires the hippocampal formation: evidence from spontaneous exploration and spatial learning tasks in light (allothetic) and dark (idiothetic) tests , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[35]  S. J. Martin,et al.  Reversible neural inactivation reveals hippocampal participation in several memory processes , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Richard G M Morris,et al.  Distinct Contributions of Hippocampal NMDA and AMPA Receptors to Encoding and Retrieval of One-Trial Place Memory , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  W E Skaggs,et al.  Deciphering the hippocampal polyglot: the hippocampus as a path integration system. , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[38]  Jozsef Csicsvari,et al.  The entorhinal cognitive map is attracted to goals , 2019, Science.

[39]  D. Eilam,et al.  Home base behavior of rats (Rattus norvegicus) exploring a novel environment , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[40]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Dead Reckoning, Landmark Learning, and the Sense of Direction: A Neurophysiological and Computational Hypothesis , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  R. Passingham The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[42]  A. Redish Beyond the Cognitive Map: From Place Cells to Episodic Memory , 1999 .

[43]  John M. Pearce,et al.  Hippocampal lesions disrupt navigation based on cognitive maps but not heading vectors , 1998, Nature.

[44]  Emilio Kropff,et al.  Place cells, grid cells, and the brain's spatial representation system. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[45]  I Q Whishaw,et al.  Calibrating space: Exploration is important for allothetic and idiothetic navigation , 1999, Hippocampus.

[46]  M. Eacott,et al.  On familiarity and recall of events by rats , 2007, Hippocampus.

[47]  C. Vorhees,et al.  Impaired spatial and sequential learning in rats treated neonatally with d‐fenfluramine , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[48]  Sachin S. Deshmukh,et al.  Functional correlates of the lateral and medial entorhinal cortex: objects, path integration and local–global reference frames , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  J. Wixted The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.